Theory Thinkers And Ideas Flashcards

1
Q

Leopold - dialectical presentation of the development between the self (individual) and its other (their social position and wider community)

A

Pre-capitalist society: undifferentiated unity
Capitalist society: differentiated disunity
Communist society: differentiated unity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Leopold on Marx’s view of human nature

A

While some say that Marx denies universality, this is false, he recognises constant and variable qualities (human nature in general VS human nature in each epoch)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Leopold definitions ode to alienation + subtypes of it

A

Alienation: dysfunctional relation between entities
Subjective alienation: presence or absence of certain beliefs and feelings (eg feeling estranged)
Objective alienation: humans fail to develop or deploy their essential characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Elster, why self-realization is more important than consumption

A

1) It has increasing marginal utility
2) doing something that is esteemed by other peopleciscthecmost important source of self-esteem which motivates us to continue living

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Elster, why self-realization doesn’t happen under capitalism

A

Lack of desire, opportunity or both

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Elster, alienation as lack of autonomy causes + response

A

Capitalism creates a compulsive desire for consumption
Response1: not all consumption under capitalism is compulsive (motivation is more complex)
Response2: links to capitalism are not always unique

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Elster, stages or rule of capital over labour

A

Formal subsumption: worker gets wage to make raw materials into product
Real subsumption: in the factory production process, the worker is an appendage of the machine
Labor becomes a means for its own enslavement BUT this actually blunts motivation to abolish capitalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Cohen functional explanation

A

Something - e (birds having hollow bones) which has a certain effect f (flight facilitation) is explained by that certain effect

Used on base and superstructure:
Superstructures hold foundations together AND superstructure is explained by the nature of the base

Use on link between tech development and production relation: the prevailing production relations prevail because they are relations which advance the development of the productive forces

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Cohen - “primacy thesis”

A

The level of development of productive power explains the nature of economic structure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Cohen, “development thesis”

A

The productive forces tend to develop throughout history

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Cohen, “development thesis”

A

The productive forces tend to develop throughout history

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Elster, problems with Marx + more plausible account of relationship between development of forces of production and relations of production

A

1) no account of how less then optimal character of existing relations of production motivates individual men to collective action
2) no historical proof
More plausible account: capitalism meant a higher surplus at a given technical level (link to individual motivation and tech development is a byproduct)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Elster, potential responses to the problem that the change from capitalism to communism is implausible

A

1) communist revolution is caused by something else but will coincide with the emergence of contradiction between forces and relations of production
2) communism happens when capitalism becomes inefficient with respect to the use of productive forces (not development) eg unemployment, wasted goods
3) stages of innovation: 1) search for new methods 2) selection of new methods - capitalism is worse at second (marx argued this but it seems reasonable to reject both)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Locke, limitations of the legislative

A

1) have to govern by laws established which do nit discriminate
2) laws have to be designed to maximise common good (no right to destroy, enslave or designedly impoverish subjects)
3) cannot take part of their subject’s property without their consent
4) legislative cannot transfer the power of making laws into other hands because it is delegated from the people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Lebovics, two key things to note about Locke’s account of property

A

1) act of combining labour with property did not require the common consent of the rest of mankind
2) Locke did not differentiate between our own labour and that of living chattels and employees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cohen, Motivational possibility of Rousseau’s account

A

Rousseau advances an account of human nature where human beings are naturally good but society depraves them and makes them miserable

17
Q

Cohen, Institutional possibility of Rousseau’s account

A

How can people acquire the general will, think of each other as equals and prioritise the common good

18
Q

Okin, reasons why women can only be a part of the sovereign through the goodwill of their housbands

A

1) women have sexual and emotional power over men
2) women get pregnant—> incapacitated
3) husband has to superwise wife to make sure kids are his
4) women are evil

19
Q

Okin, reasons why women can only be a part of the sovereign through the goodwill of their housbands

A

1) women have sexual and emotional power over men
2) women get pregnant—> incapacitated
3) husband has to superwise wife to make sure kids are his
4) women are evil

20
Q

Cohen, Rousseau allows for checks and balances

A

Check 1: sovereign exercises check on the government
Check 2: government exercises check on the sovereign by proposing laws which the sovereign may or may not pass (Letters from the Mountain)

21
Q

Bertram, Condorcet response to the disagreement objection

A

Assembly is an epistemic device for getting an answer to what the general will is
Condorcet shows that providing only that each citizen has a better than 50:50 chance of bringing right, as the number of citizens increases, the probability of being right approaches 1

22
Q

Bertram, why Rousseau has been called despotic

A

1) separation of the general will and the will of all means that people can’t use their true will
2) total alienation in social pact leaves citizens no recourse against an all powerful sovereign
3) indivisibility of sovereign power means there are no checks and balances
4) mo possibility of citizen self-organization -> citizens are at the mercy of the elite government
5) manipulation or the citizen by the lawgiver

23
Q

Dunn, filmer’s account of rights of rulers

A

No human has right over his own life and human rulers had the right to take take the rights of own or foreign subjects when in their judgement they sufficiently damaged the public good
This means they derived their rights not from subjects but God
Rights of rulers are essentially rights of ownership

24
Q

Dunn, the centrality of trust in Locke

A

Locke doesn’t distrust political authority but human beings left to their own devices
Even the sovereign can betray trust, the remedy of betrayal of trust is the right of revolution
Locke downplays the implications
1) no ruler who truly means the good of his people will fail to make them feel this
2) stray acts of tyranny will pass unchallenged, victims cannot in practice expect the support of others
3) only a clear threat, actual or potential, to the estates, liberties and lives of the majority will bring resistance

25
Q

Simmons, role of rights in Locke

A

Rights are not just the flip side of duties
Rights and duties are equally fundamental because Locke believes in a robust zone of indifference in which rights protect our ability to make choices