Theory Of Contract Law Flashcards

1
Q

Explain the rules of contract law.

A
  • Terms of contract must be certain - both parties must voluntarily agree.
  • Mostly developed through common law.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain the theory of contract law.

A
  • Contract law based on promising - law recognises contracting party as having incurred legal obligation to perform their promise.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain how implied terms are default terms.

A
  • Automatic rights / terms of contract - therefore not expressed in formation of contract.
  • Can be statute law - Consumer Rights Act 2015 - goods + services - S.9, S.10, S.11, S.49, S.52
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain freedom of contract + the competing need to protect consumers.

A
  • Exclude terms - less frequent + protect C as nothing can overrule CRA 2015 in F.C.
  • Freedom as parties can decline offer.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain the distinction between offers, offers in unilateral contracts + ITT.

A
  • Offer - bilateral - goods exchanged.
  • Offer - unilateral - both parties to perform obligations.
  • ITT - invited to make offer, through auctions, adverts, + articles - Fisher v Bell.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain acceptances - including rationale for postal rules + electronic communications.

A
  • Postal rules seen as unfair on offeror - could never receive / receive letter of acceptance late - therefore could get into another contract in meantime.
  • Courts unwilling to extend postal rules to modern methods of communication - offeree should take reasonable steps to ensure acceptances been received.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain the rationale for consideration + the relationship between consideration + privity, + between consideration + economic duress.

A
  • Consideration is both parties putting something of value into contract.
  • Thomas v Thomas: law concerns bargains.
  • Jackson v Horizon Holidays: privity - parties can only benefit where named.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain the nature + effectiveness of exclusion clauses.

A
  • Exclude / limit liability - invalid - must be incorporated.
  • Dispute on clause meaning - relied by B till challenged.
  • Rule of 3rd parties - excludes 3rd parties benefiting.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain good faith.

A
  • Both parties do what they said - reliance.
  • Responsible for losses if party at fault.
  • Losses must be reasonable in contemplation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain balancing interests + justice.

A
  • Both public + private interests need to be balanced - contract law needs to protect everyone.
  • Contract law + justice - aims to put you back in position you should’ve been in.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain the principle of fault.

A
  • Responsibility on one / no parties - blameworthiness.
  • Breaches can result in damages + recession - frustration remedies decided depending on circumstances, due to no parties being at fault.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain morality.

A
  • Hart v Devlin debate.
  • Definition of morality.
  • Relationship between law + morality.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly