Theory Flashcards
Elements of assurance engagement (CREST)
- Criteria
- Report containing conclusion
- Evidence to support conclusion
- Subject mater
- 3 party relationship (responsible party/practitioner/intended user)
Benefits of assurance engagements
- Enhance credibility of information
- Reduces risk of management bias/error/fraud
- Draws attention to deficiencies
- Professional/objective/unbiased opinion
- Ensures high quality/reliable information circulates market
- Gives investors added faith in market
- Improves reputation of organisation trading in market
Reasonable assurance
High assurance
Expressed positively
In our opinion provides a true and fair view…..
Limited assurance
Moderate assurance
Expressed negatively
Nothing has come to our attention….
Audit small company criteria
Turnover < £10.2 million
Balance sheet < £5.1 million
Employees < 50
Meet 2 out of 3
Work undertaken for audit (ISA500)
Inspection Observation External confirmation Recalculation Re-performance Analytical procedures Inquiry
Work undertaken for review of FS (ISRE2400)
Inquiry
Analytical procedures
Work undertaken for review of prospective information (ISAE3400)
Assessment of assumptions
Re-computation
Written representations
Responsibilities of statutory auditor
- Form independent opinion on truth/fairness of accounts
- Confirm accounts prepared in accordance with CA
- Confirm whether info given in director’s report is consistent
Responsibilities of management
- Manage business to achieve objectives
- Assess business risk
- Safeguarding assets
- Keeping accounting records
- Preparing FS
- Compliance with laws
2 types of fraud
- Misstatement from fraudulent financial reporting
- Misstatements from misappropriation of assets
Fraud risks
- Management with poor integrity
- Deficient internal controls
- Unusual transactions
- Financial reporting pressures
- Problems in gaining audit evidence
- Unique issues arising from systems
Related parties - issues
- May have undue influence on entity
- Transaction may not be arm’s length
- Risk of non-disclosure
Related parties - audit work at
- Planning stage
- Detailed work stage
- Review stage
Related parties - planning
Consider materiality
Related parties - detailed testing
- Obtain full list of related parties
- Ensure audit team aware
- Audit evidence may be limited
Related parties - documentation
Written representations
Laws and regulations - planning
Understand legal framework
Assess risk of non-compliance
Laws and regulations - evidence
Inquiry of management
Written representations
Laws and regulations - documentation
Impact of non-compliance on audit opinion
Reporting non-compliance
Those charged with governance
Shareholders
Third parties
Money laundering offences
- Possessing/dealing/concealing proceeds of crime
- Attempting/assisting/incitement to commit laundering
- Failure of individual in regulated sector to report suspicion
- Tipping off
Money laundering requirements
- Appoint ML compliance principal (MLCP)
- Appoint ML reporting officer (MRLO)
- Customer due diligence
- Report suspicion without tipping off
- Maintain specific record
- Policies to ensure compliance
- Train staff
Expectations gap - common misconceptions
- Auditor is responsible for preparing FS
- Auditor is responsible for detecting fraud
- Auditor checks all transactions
- Clean audit report means FS are correct
Expectations gap - narrowing the gap
- Report sets of directors responsibilities
- Report sets out auditor responsibilities
- Report explain how audit is conducted
- Role of audit committees in corporate governance
- Engagement letter sets out responsibilities
Expectations gap - why things still go wrong
- Companies still fail
- Fraud is committed
- Genuine mistakes are made
- Audit failure can occur through no fault or negligence
IFAC role
Issue ISAs
ISAs contain
- Basic principles
- Essential procedures
- Explanatory material
Depart from ISA when
Exceptional circumstances mean departure is only way to achieve audit objectives
Apply ISAs to
Material matters only
FRC ISAs based on
IAASB’s ISAs augmented by extra sections on UK issues
FRC practice notes
Assist audit in applying ISAs
Persuasive not prescriptive
Indicative of good practice
Similar to ISAs explanatory material
FRC bulletins
Provide auditor with timely guidance on new/emerging issues
FRC ethical standard purpose
Provides guidance on ethical dilemmas
Directors role with internal controls
- Set up system of internal controls
- Review ts effectiveness
- Consider need for internal audit
Auditor role with internal controls
- Ascertain control
- Review controls
- Evaluate controls
- Determine audit approach based on controls
Additional services provided separate from audit:
- Review design of control system
- Review operations of control system
5 ethical principles (PIPCO)
Professional competence and due care Integrity Professional behaviour Confidentiality Objectivity
Integrity
Straightforward and honest
Objectivity
Not allow bias/conflict of interest/undue influence to override judgement
Professional competence and due care
Maintain professional knowledge / act in accordance with standards
Confidentiality
Disclose only with proper authority / do not use for personal advantage
Professional behaviour
Comply with relevant laws / avoid discrediting profession
6 threats (MASSIF)
Management Advocacy Self-interest Self-review Intimidation Familiarity
Self-interest threat examples
Financial interests
Incentive compensation
Undue dependence on fees
Self-review threat example
Data reviewed by preparer
Advocacy threat examples
Acting as advocate during litigation
Promoting shares of client
Familiarity threat examples
Former partner of firm being director of client
No rotation of engagement teams
Intimidation threat examples
Threat of dismissal/replacement
Pressured to reduce work performed to reduce fee
3 categories of safeguards
Regulations
Individual
Work environment
Safeguards - regulations
ICAEW code
IESBA code
FRC ethical standard
ISAs (UK)
Safeguards - individual
CPD
Keeping record of contentious issues
Independent mentor
Contact with legal advisers/professional bodies
Safeguards - work environment
Recruitment procedures
Disciplinary procedures
Ethical leadership
Policies for monitoring employee performance
Policies for monitoring engagement quality control
Different partners/teams for non-audit services
Discussing ethics with those charged with governance
Consultation with another accountant
Independence of mind
State of mind that enables opinions not affected by influences that compromise professional judgement
Independence in appearance
Avoidance of circumstance so significant reasonable/informed third party having knowledge of all facts and safeguards would conclude objectivity had been compromised
Threats to independence
Actual/threatened litigation Financial interests Loans/guarantees Business relationships Family/personal relationships Employment connections with clients Long association Gifts/hospitality Provision of non-audit services Fees
Safeguards against loss of objectivity
Quality control procedures
Audit committee (non-execs)
Audit rotation
Advantages of audit committee
For auditor independent liaison between exec directors
For company can give increased confidence in reporting
Benefit of audit rotation
Loss of independence through familiarity is guarded against
Obligatory disclosures
Suspects client to have committed:
- Terrorist offence
- Treason
- Money laundering
Voluntary disclosures
- To comply with the quality review of ICAEW
- To respond to an inquiry/investigation by ICAEW
- To protect professional interest of accountant in legal proceedings
- To comply with technical/professional/ethical standards
Opinion shopping
Client seeks second opinion from other auditors
Duty for auditors to communicate with first auditor
Quality control safeguards for firms
- Observing acceptance procedures (not accepting difficult clients)
- Client care procedures
- Key man insurance
- Setting up of quality control system
Leadership responsibilities for QC
- Sufficient/appropriate experience
- Ability to carry out job
- Authority to carry out job
Human resources QC
- Recruitment
- Capabilities
- Career development
- Compensation
- Performance evaluation
- Competence
- Promotion
- Estimation of personnel needs
Engagement partner responsibility - engagement performance
- Direction
- Supervision
- Review
- Consultation
- Resolution of disputes
QC monitoring procedures must be
- Relevant
- Adequate
- Operating effectively
- Complied with
QC monitoring corrective actions
- Remedial action with individual
- Communication with training department
- Changes in QC procedures
- Disciplinary action
Engagement partner responsibilities - direction
Informing staff about:
- Work to do
- Nature of client
- Potential problems
- Responsibilities
Engagement partner responsibilities - review
Consideration of whether:
- Work complies with standards
- Significant matters/conclusions documented
- Evidence if sufficient/appropriate
Engagement partner responsibilities - consultation
Contentious matters must be discussed and properly reviewed
Engagement partner responsibilities - QC review
Evaluation of:
- Significant judgements
- Conclusions
Consequences of getting audit wrong
- Being sued for negligence
- Prosecutions/fines
- Disciplinary procedures from ICAEW
- Loss of reputation/clients/key staff
- Collapse of assurance firm
Fee rules
- No prescribed basis
- Percentage/contingency only for non-assurance
- Quoting too low (lowballing) may threaten competence and due care
- Fair and reasonable regarding staff/time/risk
Tendering process
1) Firm considers if it wants the work
2) Consider practical issues e.g. staff/location
3) Estimate work involved/fees
4) Obtain further details from client (work required/background information)
5) Prepare proposal
Factors for consideration in client screening
- Management integrity
- Risk
- Relationships
- Ability to perform work
- Engagement economics
High risk client indicators
- Poor performance
- Lack of finance
- Odd accounting
- Lack of FD
- Significant related party/unusual transactions
Low risk client indicators
- Good prospects
- Well finances
- Strong controls
- Prudent accounting
- Competent directors
- No unusual transactions
Sources of info about new clients
- Enquiries of other sources (bankers/solicitors)
- Review of documents (accounts/credit rating)
- Previous auditors
- Review of rules/standards relevant to industry
Before acceptance auditor should
- Ensure professional qualified to act (legally/ethically)
- Ensure resources are adequate (time/staff)
- Obtain references
- Communicate with present auditor
After acceptance auditor should
- Ensure outgoing auditors removal properly conducted
- Ensure new auditor appointment is valid
- Set up/submit letter of engagement
Appointment decision - first audit
No need to follow professional rules
Make own decision
Appointment decision - client refuses permission to contact outgoing auditor/let outgoing auditor reply
Decline appointment
Items included in engagement letter
- Objective/scope of audit
- Managements responsibility for FS
- Form of reports/communications
- Inherent limitations
- Arrangement regarding planning
- Expectations in relation to representations
- Basis on which fees are calculated
- Restrictions of auditors liability
- Reference to further agreements
Audit strategy contents
Vague
- Scope of audit engagement (framework/audit coverage/personnel)
- Reporting objectives (timing/type of reports)
- Direction of audit (materiality/preliminary high risk areas)
Audit plan contents
Detailed
- Description of nature/timing/extent risk assessment procedures
- Description of nature/timing/extent audit procedures
- Other audit procedures
Objectives of planning
- Ensure attention devoted to specific areas
- Potential problems identified
- Facilitating review
Logistics to consider when planning
Staff
Client
Locations
Deadlines
Use of IT examples
CAATs
Admin
Communication with partner/staff
Factors to consider when deciding on time/budget
- Prior year time records
- Help in risk assessment
- Materiality
Materiality guide - profit before tax
5%
Materiality guide - gross profit
0.5-1%
Materiality guide - revenue
0.5-1%
Materiality guide - total assets
1-2%
Materiality guide - net assets
2-5%
Materiality guide - profit after tax
5-10%
Factors materiality affects
- What/how many items to test
- Sampling techniques
- Level of error leading to modification of report
Analytical procedures definition
Analysis of plausible relationships among financial/non-financial data