THEORY Flashcards
CONTEXT:
- Athens had endured, within the preceding decades, various political organisations from democratic rule to tyranny.
- The Peloponnesian War had devastated Athens and undermined the strength of their political institutions
* The Republic can be read as a response to the challenges surronding Athens at the time, provding a new ideological blueprint to create a stable and strong city from scratch.
* Plato attributed the fall of Athens to the absence of virtuous leadership, meaning the city would inevitably collapse
* Criticised the Inadequacy of Athenian democracy, where mob rule and demagoguery was too likely - Palto’s vision within ‘The Republic’ portrays the ideal city under the just rule of philosopher-kings, obtaining the necessary prerequisites to govern wisely.
* Not only was Plato attempting to introduce an entirely new concept of political organisation to defend against the deficienes which corrupted Athens, but also responding to the failures of democracy within Athens. - The execution of Socrates under democracy was percieved by Plato as gross injustice and his dialogue within ‘The Republic’ immitated this:
* Socrates is berated by a stubborn and difficult Thrasymachus who refuses to accept his argument, is symbolic of Socrates attempt to educate and enlighten the youth being misconstrued as manipulation.
* Socrates was born into a corrupt society (democracy) yet he turns out to be the paragon of human conduct and therefore was gifted with eyesight, whereas those who executed him were blind and corrupted by the democratic regime.
-relates to Plato’s argument that philosophers’ are given wrong reputations and their value is not recognised
* It emphasies Plato’s point; rulers do not recognise the power and value philosophers have, and their regimes will suffer accordingly.
PLATO’S CRITICISM OF ATHENIAN DEMOCRACY
- The power of the masses
* Plato outlines how the character of most men are prone to vice because they are weak in the face of sedcution, and only a rare few have a godlike nature who can exercise ‘control over the desiring element.’
* however, in AD, the masses were endowered with signif. power and as a result were easily impressionable, swayed by demagogues or populist leaders
* such men lacked the necessary virtues to insitute good governance, and instead were ruled by their desire, which created an unstable and unjsut regime.
* AD failed to recognise the correct virtues needed in a rule and thus a volatile political system was prevelant. - The absence of meritocracy:
* leaders who exuded the most charm and charisma wielded the most poplitical support
* therefore, the absence of intellecutal traits and virtuous behaviour empowered men most united towards positions of power - Plato illustrastes the dangers of this throughout his philosophy. - Regime instability
* their failure to elevate men worth of power within their political system, created instabiltiy because there wre frequent changes in leadership, in response to the impressionable masses who were easily manipulated.
* failed to identify the true nature of these men, because they too had unjust souls due to the absence of appropiate education and knoweldge.
John Cooper: Pyshcological state
- For Plato’s society and individual’s to function, they require a certain pyshcological state.
- Justice, in accordance with Plato’s theory, is not just a means to an end, but the only source of happiness
* Cooper characterises Plato’s theory of justice as a reponse to the Sophists who defined justice as a concept serving the interests of the powerful. - Tripartite theory of the soul - outlines how each component has a function, and a just person is the one where reason rules.
- Educational importance - recog. the importance placed on education to fulfil Plato’s concept of justice, as they require certain skills to make rational decisions and cultivate virtues necessary in achieving justice e.g., self-control
Melissa Lane: Socrates and Plato introdcution - how they differ
- Socrates argued that wisdom required one to acknowledge their own ignorance, and philosophy’s end goal is to disover the truth and promote the good
- Plato discuss the distinction between appearance and reality, where we live in a material world which is a mere shadow of a higher reality, one which can only be apprehended via reason
- Lane differentiates between Socrates who’s individual method of questioning and emphasis on ethics, and Plato’s broader philosophy which concerns metaphysical and epistemological concepts.
Malcom Schofield - questions how desireable Plato’s ideal society really is by critiquing the readitional reading of ‘The Republic’ as a ideal blueprint.
- Schofield emphasies how Plato’s theory pertains to the context of political instability characteristing Athens at the time
* Whilst the traditional reading of ‘The Republic’ deems his philosophy to be a coherent theory about government, Schofield argues the importance of recognising it as a repsonse to his contemporary soicety instead. - Plato’s theory is too idealistic and impractical because his CW seems to be divorced from reality
* A directed focus on abstract ideals whilst overlooking practical concerns characterises his philosopy as idealistic. - Plato institutes a heirarchis organisation of society, with elitist sentiments through the division of scoeity intwo three main facets; rulers, soldiers, and laborers.
* Schofield argues this top-down structure is arbitrary in nature and ignorant towards the reality of social roles - He critiques the unattainable likelihood of philosopher-kings ruling with perfect wisdome, and further questions how this could ever possible be attined through educations.
- Schofield declares Plato’s rejection of democracy is rooted in his authoritarian conception of politics, which overlooked the most critical juncture in democratic politics - representation and participation in decision-making.
Scholarship development and contributions
- Leo Strauss recognises the importance of reading Plato’s work with the acknowledgement it is a response to the decine of Athens.
* Strauss - The Republic is an alternative strucutre to democracy, because Plato argues tyranny is the end result for deocratic regimes. - Jacob Klein putforth the argument that Plato’s work should be understood as a component to a larger philsophical project, responding to the intellectual and historical context of his time
* rejecting the reading of ‘The Republic’ as a standalone piece of work, greater understanding can be ahceived when we study the grammatical features within this book. - G.R.F. Ferrari: Plato’s work is centered around crucial conceits like the nature of justice, rather than creating a blueprint for an idea society to be founded upon
- Martha Nussbaum: Plato’s work should be read as showing a deep concern towards ethics and morality, whilst he does address politics in depth, his work is more than merely political philosophy
* it is also about the role of emotions in political life.
Critique ideas
- Totalitarianism - the elite heriarchy instituted by Plato over a democratic governance draws a resembelence to modern dictatorships
* MY ARGUMENT: whilst we can understand the reason for his anit-democraic attitude lies in his scathing contempt towards Athenian democracy, where Socrates was persecuted, it is imporant we analyse his work within his context and our modern understandings of democracy and authoritarianism.
* links to: Jacob Klein putforth the argument that Plato’s work should be understood as a component to a larger philsophical project, responding to the intellectual and historical context of his time
* rejecting the reading of ‘The Republic’ as a standalone piece of work, greater understanding can be ahceived when we study the grammatical features within this book. - Failure to be realistic
* MY ARGUMENT criticise how Plato’s conception of politics is too orderly and refined, whereas real politics is convulated and messy with various dynamics creating new problems.
* We cannot attribute this idealism to hsi context, but Athens itself is degenerating and collapsing because of the realties of both men and politics
* further, the overemphasise on the rule of reason over passion insinuates emoitons are unproductive and irrelevant to both human life and politics
* this is false - emotions are fundamental to human existnece, and therefore should be prominent in politics too.
What is atypical about Plato’s thinking?
(1) Philosophers should be Kings, and Kings should be philosophers
–the only way to achieve good governance is if philosophers obtain political power
—the most virtuous and educated men, capable of governing
–those most suited to power are those who do not seek it
(2) Does not align with factionalism, suggesting compartmentalisation of diff. types of government are flawed
–sometimes society’s govt. need to be blended
—prevalent in his work; includes both democratic and anti-democratic characteristics
—-e.g., socialism: seek collective happiness and prevent oppression
—-fascism: censorship and deception is acceptable to maintain order
—-oligarchical: power is concentrated in the hands of a few (but these are the men who, through trials and tribulations, have proven to be the most virtuous and worthy).
(3) Athens / Sparta divide
–creates a constitution without aligning with either state
–Athens - intellectually driven
–Sparta - militaristic in its organisation
How does Plato define justice?
‘it is just to pay everyone what is owed to them’ (B1,pg6)
–respond to someone according to the calibre of their intensions, .: response accordingly
What are the questions Plato asks about Justice?
(Q1) The issue of judgement
–to what extent are our friends always just, and enemies unjust?
—how do we remain just?
(A1) ‘It is just to help a friend if he is good, and harm an enemy if he is bad.’ (pg11)
–how do we distinguish good and bad if we are biased in our opinion of their character; this affects our assumptions about their intentions (our history with them).
(Q2) How to remain just
–can a just man remain just if he inflicts injustice, or is he from now on unjust, as a just man would never engage in unjust action?
–if not, then it is not just to respond accordingly, but unjust instead.
What is Glaucon’s argument about justice? (not about what justice is, but if being unjust is more profitable)
- Justice is merely adovcated becuase of the ‘reputation, prestige and rewards (it) brings’ (49).
- a just man is only happy if he is recognised as just
- whereas an injust man, maintaining a facade of being just, will be happy to act unjustly to achieve success
- Asks: are men just because they truly seek justice, or do they seek the ‘rewards and recognitions’ (41) of others than elevate them?
- Argues: it is the reputation of being just/appearing to be just which improves ones life, and if this were to be abolished, no rational man would persue a just course
- the best route a man can take is to ‘to act unjustly, and use the proceeds to pay for sacrifices.’ (47) .
* in this sense, they achieve the benefits assocaited with just men, but the personal gains one can achieve by acting unjsut is too great to forsake - achieve their own ambitions and pacify the Gods too.
- the best route a man can take is to ‘to act unjustly, and use the proceeds to pay for sacrifices.’ (47) .
Why does Plato believe justice is more profitable than injustice?
- Injustice, through its natural wickedness, is ‘incapable of action through faction and disagreement.’ (33)
- justice ‘produces cooperation and friendship’ (32)
- justice itself is not given a coherent or explicit definition, but is accepted as associative with a good soul, whereas injsutice resides in a bad soul
What is justice in a city sense?
- ‘justice is the business of everyone performing his own task’ (127)
- societal relations are harmonious when each indiv. stays within their own craft
- again, Plato’s concern for innovation shines through - does not want the system to be disrupted by indiv. intermingling between crafts.
- the happiness of the collective > the happiness of the indiv.
What is Plato’s response to Thrasymachus’s idea of justice?
**If we assume that the strong will rule as they are the ones capable of achieving positions of power, then according to Plato’s philosophy, philosophers will still rule in a virtuous way; interests of the philosopher align with the interests of the public.
- imprt. -> do not want to rule, but rule out of obligation.
- fear the oppressive rule of another, therefore it is in their interests to rule in a harmonious and stable manner because they do not seek power
- —‘**fear makes decent people rule’ **(26) -> not ambition or prestige that entices them, but the fear that no other decent man will rule
- —‘the good and wise person will not be prepared to outdo the person like him, but only (…) his opposite.’ (30)
- —philosophers understand this unavoidable necessity
What is a just man?
- a just man has a ‘perfect unity of diverse elements’ (141)
* the core elements of his soul co-exist and fulfil their designated function, but they do not intercahnge as they are fixed and separate entities
* w/out this harmony, dishamrony is inevit. (e.g., the spirited faction is in control) and this creates an unjust man.
Where does Plato beleives peoples’ concepts about justice and injustice start?
At a young age, therefore education and upbrining should be tailored to create just and honourable men and women
* city needs guardians, but Plato is concerned about the education and upbrining of the defenders of this city
* (1) censorhip of unfavourable stories
* e.g., one which shows there are no repercussions to unjust action
* this would normalise betryal, deciet and and brutality amongst their own people - dangrous of those in posiitons of defence, who need to foster trust.
* e.g., stories blaming God
* this would allow men to evade indiv. respb. by blaming unsavoury characterisitcs and instances on God, rather than their own deficint character
What does Thrasymachus say about justice?
‘Justice is simply what is good for the strong.’ (B1,pg. 15)
–the ruler will forever and always act to achieve their own ends; through their strength and knowledge, they come to understand how injustice is more profitable.
–stronger rulers will engage in the unjust rule because it is individually beneficial, and as the pinnacle of strength, they are not constrained by any other higher power
Why is the tyrannical man unhappy?
- Lack of satisfaction
* he is a slave to ‘foreign madness’ because he indulges in every whim or desire, purging ‘the soul of restraint’ (287)
* lives a tormented life - the absence of rational judgement forces him to pursue every pleasure, but can never be satisfied. - The dangers of lust
* within a tyrannical man, ‘lust will dwell within him as a tyrant, in total anarchy and lawlessness.’ (290)
* satisfaction is impossible to achieve because the series of immoral beahviour emabarked upon by this man does ‘not satisfy his desires in the slightes.’ (296)
* living in accordance to his desires, he has banished reason and self-discipline, which cannot defeat the ‘bodyguard of lust.’
* lust makes a slave out of a man - his addiction to pleasure combined with the absence of rationality traps him in a hopeless pursuit of satisfying an Insatiable diet; a ‘true tyrant is a true salve.’ (296)
* just has his people are slaves to him under his tyrannical rule, he himself is a salve to his own desires - again, Plato shows how the soul of a ruler and their respective regimes exist as mirror-images of one another.
Why is being just more profitable?
- The soul of a tyrant is the ‘furthest removed from law and order’ (306) because the rational facet has been made subservient to desire.
* Plato believes if one is unjust, insofar as to say there is an imbalance within their soul, unhappiness in inevitable.
* You are merely a salve to your desires, and without rational judgement shining a light on what is good, satisfaction is impossible.
* Contrastingly, ‘praiseworthy actions (…)bring true savage elements of our nature under the control of the human.’ (309)
How does Plato connect a man to their correlating political regime?
- ‘five types of city (…) fice dispositions of the soul’ (254)
* aristocracy exists as the mirror-image of philosohpers
Timocracy
- timocracy is the natural progression from aristocracy following civil war within a city
* Palto does not lament the loss of A, because he understands a breakdown of the natural order is inevitable as permanence is impossible
* mistakes will inevit. be made, it just so happens this change corresponds to a change of ‘the sovereign body itself.’(255) - The new regime may retain characteristics belong to its predecessor, but like its ruler, they are more ‘naturally cut out for war than peace’ (257)
* Plato links the regime with the composion of the man’s soul by stating he neglects the balance between artisan and physical education .: both he and the regime are more militaristic in nature
* suggests there is almost a dichotomy within the ruler’s soul: ‘feeding the rational element in his soul (…) other feed the desiring and spirited elements’ (259)
Oligarchy
- the ‘poor man is excluded from power’ (260)
- oligarchs are self-serving and ambitious men who pritotise their desires over the needs of the general public
* they decide the worth of a man corresponds to his net worh .: those with the funds to buy a suitbale character, are those worthy of power
* Oligarchs are mastered by their desires because they lack self-discipline, therefore the ‘rational and spirited parts’ (264) of their souls are imprisioned.
* these men suffer from imbalanced souls, are victims of desire, and blinded by their distored physical reality because they negelct what is good.
* therefore, the regime immitates their rulers; poverty is widespread within a soicety where there is ‘a lack of education (…)poor upbringing and constitutional arrangement.’ (263)