Theorists - Family Diversity Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Key Theorist - Chester (1985): Neo-Conventional Families

WHAT DO THEY ARGUE?

A
  • There has been an increase in family diversity, but it is not very significant.
  • Family diversity is exaggerated.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Key Theorist - Chester (1985): Neo-Conventional Families

HOW CAN THIS THEORY BE EVALUATED?

A
  • Willmott and Young are in support, and argue that:
    1) Apart from the above, Chester sees no change.
    2) Most people are choosing to stay in alternative families on a permanent basis.
    3) Most people aspire to the TNF based on marriage.
    4) The main reason why some people are not part of the TNF currently is due to the life circle.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Key Theorist - Rappaports and Rappaports (1982): Family Diversity

WHAT DO THEY ARGUE?

A
  • There has been an increase in family diversity and this is significant and that there are five types of family diversity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Key Theorist – Rappaports and Rappaports (1982): Family Diversity

WHAT ARE THE FIVE TYPES OF FAMILY DIVERSITY ACCORDING TO THIS THEORY?

A
Organisational diversity
Cultural diversity
Social class diversity
Life stage diversity
Generational diversity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Key Theorist – Rappaports and Rappaports (1982): Family Diversity

WHAT DOES ORGANISATIONAL DIVERSITY REFER TO (INCLUDING AN EXAMPLE)?

A

The way that families are organised.

Example:
- Some couples have joint conjugal roles and two wage earners, whilst others have segregated conjugal roles and one-wage earner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Key Theorist – Rappaports and Rappaports (1982): Family Diversity

WHAT DOES CULTURAL DIVERSITY REFER TO (INCLUDING AN EXAMPLE)?

A
  • Idea that different cultural, religious and ethnic groups have different family structures.

Example:
- Higher proportion of female headed lone-parent families among African-Caribbean households and a higher proportion of extended families among Asian households.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Key Theorist – Rappaports and Rappaports (1982): Family Diversity

WHAT DOES SOCIAL CLASS DIVERSITY REFER TO?

A
  • Differences in family structure are partly as a result of income differences between households in different social classes.
  • There are class differences in child-rearing practices.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Key Theorist – Rappaports and Rappaports (1982): Family Diversity

WHAT DOES LIFE STAGE DIVERSITY REFER TO?
GIVE AN EXAMPLE.

A
  • Family structure differ depending on the stage reached in the life cycle.

Example:
- Young newlyweds, couples with dependent children, retired couples whose children have grown up and left home and widows who are living alone, will all have different family structures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Key Theorist – Rappaports and Rappaports (1982): Family Diversity

WHAT DOES GENERATIONAL DIVERSITY REFER TO?
GIVE AN EXAMPLE

A
  • Older and younger generations have different attitudes and experiences which reflect the historical periods in which they have lived.

Example:
- They may have different ideas about the morality of divorce or cohabitation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Key Theorist - Stacey (1998): Postmodern Families

WHAT DO THEY ARGUE?

A
  • Greater family choice and freedom has benefitted women.
  • It has enabled women to free themselves from patriarchal oppression, and shape their family arrangements to meet their needs.
  • One of the new family structures is the ‘divorce extended family’. Members of this family are connected by divorce rather than marriage.
  • The key members in the ‘divorce extended family’ are often female, and may include former in-laws, such as a mother and daughter-in-law or a man’s ex-wife and his new partner.
  • Postmodern families are diverse, and their shape depends on the active choices people make about how to live their lives. This includes choices about whether to get divorced, cohabit or come out as gay.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Key Theorist - Stacey (1998): Postmodern Families

WHAT DID THEY FIND THROUGH THEIR STUDY?

A

1) Women have been the main agents of change in the family. For example, many of the women she interviewed, rejected the traditional housewife-mother role.
2) Many of the women had worked, returned to education as adults, improved their job prospects, divorced and remarried. These women created new family types to suit their needs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Key Theorist - Stacey (1998): Postmodern Families

WHAT DO THEY ARGUE?

A
  • It is pointless trying to make large scale generalisations about ‘the family’ as if it were a single thing.
  • Instead, a family is simply whatever those involved choose to call their family.
  • Families are flexible with unclear boundaries.

Is critical of modernist theories who believe the family is a concrete structure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Key Theorists - Giddens and Beck: Family

WHAT HAS INFLUENCED THESE THEORISTS?

A

The postmodernist argument about society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Key Theorists - Giddens and Beck: Family

WHAT HAVE THESE THEORIES DONE WITH THE POSTMODERNIST ARGUMENT ABOUT SOCIETY?

A

Applied some of these to understanding family life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Key Theorists - Giddens and Beck: Family

WHAT DOES THEIR INDIVIDUALISATION THESIS ARGUE?

A
  • Traditional social structures such as class, gender and the family, have lost their influence on people.
  • In the past, people’s lives were defined by fixed roles that largely prevented them from choosing their own life course.
  • Individuals in today’s society have less fixed roles to follow.
  • People have become free from traditional roles and structures, leaving them with the freedom to choose how to live their lives.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Key Theorist - Giddens (1992): Choice and Equality

WHAT DO THEY ARGUE?

A
  • In recent decades, the family and marriage have been transformed by more choice and a more equal relationship between men and women.
  • Personal relationships inevitably become less stable due to choice.
  • The ‘personal relationship’ is a kind of rolling contract that can be ended by either partner. This increases family diversity by creating more lone-parent families, one-person households and reconstituted families.
  • Same sex families are leading the way to towards new family types and more equal relationships because same-sex couples aren’t influenced by tradition as much as heterosexual couples.
  • Same-sex couples have been able to develop relationships based on choice rather than traditional roles, creating a family type which suits their needs.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Key Theorist - Giddens (1992): Choice and Equality

WHAT REASONS DO THEY GIVE FOR THE INCREASED EQUALITY BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN? GIVE AT LEAST TWO EXAMPLES

A

1) Contraception has allowed sex and intimacy rather than reproduction to become the main reason for the relationship.
2) Women have gained greater independence as a result of feminism and greater educational and work opportunities.
3) In the past, traditional family relationships were held together by external forces such as laws around marriage, and the powerful norms against divorce and sex outside of marriage. He describes this as the ‘pure relationship’.
4) Couples in today’s society, are free to define their relationship by themselves, rather than acting out roles that have been defined by law or tradition.
5) The key feature of a ‘pure relationship’ is that it solely exists to satisfy each partner’s needs. The relationship is only likely to survive if both partners think it should.
6) Nowadays, couples stay together because of happiness, love and a sense of attraction, and not because of tradition, a sense of duty or because of the children.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Key Theorist - Beck (1992): Negotiated Family

WHAT DOES BECK ARGUE ABOUT SOCIETY NOWADAYS?

A
  • We now live in a ‘risk society’ where tradition has less influence, and people have more choice, and as a result are more aware of the risks.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Key Theorist - Beck (1992): Negotiated Family

WHAT TRENDS DOES BECK OUTLINES FOR WHY THE PATRIACHAL FAMILY HAS BEEN UNDERMINED?

A

1) Greater gender equality - challenged male domination in all areas of life.
2) Greater individualism - people’s actions are influenced more by calculations of their own self-interest, rather than a sense of obligation to others.

20
Q

Key Theorist - Beck (1992): Negotiated Family

WHAT DOES BECK ARGUE THE ‘NEGOCIATED FAMILY IS?

A
  • A type of family that does not conform to the traditional norm but varies according to the wishes and expectations of its members, to decide what is best for them by negotiation.
21
Q

Key Theorist - Beck (1992): Negotiated Family

WHY DOES BECK ARGUE THAT THE NEGOCIATED FAMILY IS LESS STABLE, AND WHAT DOES HE ARGUE THIS CREATES?

A

Individuals are free to leave if their needs are not met. This creates more:

a) lone-parent families
b) remarriages
c) one-person households

22
Q

Key Theorist - Beck (1992): Negotiated Family

WHAT DOES HE ARGUE ABOUT FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS?

A

Family relationships are now subject to greater risk and uncertainty than ever before. Beck describes this family as a ‘zombie category’ as it appears to be alive, but in reality it is dead.

23
Q

Key Theorist - Beck (1992): Negotiated Family

HOW CAN THIS THEORY BE EVALUATED?

A
  • Studies by Finch and Mason challenge the ‘pure’ relationship. Couple relationships are not always ‘pure’.
24
Q

Key Theorist - Smart (2007): The Connectedness Thesis

WHAT DOES THIS THEORY ARGUE?

A
  • People are not disconnected, isolated individuals and we are fundamentally social beings whose choices are always made ‘within a web of connectedness’.
  • We live in networks of existing relationships and interwoven personal histories, and these strongly influence our range of options and choices in relationships.
25
Q

Key Theorists - Finch and Mason (1993): Extended Families

WHICH FAMILY TYPE DID THESE THEORIES STUDY?

A

Extended

26
Q

Key Theorists - Finch and Mason (1993): Extended Families

WHAT DID THESE THEORIES FIND?

A
  • Although individuals can to some extent negotiate the relationships they want, they are also embedded within family connections and obligations that restrict their freedom of choice.
27
Q

Key Theorist - May: Family Diversity

WHAT DOES MAY ARGUE?
GIVE AN EXAMPLE.

A
  • Family structures are not disappearing, they are being reshaped.

For example:
While women over the past 150 years have gained important rights in relation to voting, divorce, education and employment, this does not mean they ‘have it all’. While women can now pursue traditionally male goals such as careers, they are still expected to be heterosexual.

28
Q

Key Theorist - Einasdottir (2011): Family Diversity

WHAT DO THEY ARGUE?

A
  • While lesbianism is now tolerated, heteronormativity (norms about favouring heterosexuality), means many lesbians feel forced to remain ‘in the closet’ and this limits their lifestyle and relationship choices.
29
Q

Key Theorists - Mitchell and Goody (1977): Causes of Divorce

WHAT DO THEY NOTE?

A
  • An important change since the 1960s, has been the rapid decline in the stigma attached to divorce.
30
Q

Key Theorists - Parsons and Fletcher (1966): Rising Expectations of Marriage

WHAT DO THEY ARGUE?

A
  • There has been a change in the values of marriage.

- People expect more and are likely to end a relationship which would have been tolerated in the past.

31
Q

Key Theorist - Leach (1967): Reasons for Rising Divorce Rates

WHAT DO THEY ARGUE?

A
  • There is an emotional overload which increases the level of conflict between adults in relation to childcare housework and employment.
  • In the past of the extended family worked together and the labour was shared amongst more people.
32
Q

Key Theorist - Allan and Crow (2001): Changes in the Position of Women

WHAT DO THEY ARGUE?

A
  • The great financial independence of women makes them less willing to accept conflict.
33
Q

Key Theorist - Sigle-Rushton (2007): Changes in the Position of Women

WHAT DO THEY ARGUE?

A
  • Working mothers are more likely to divorce than those in a TNF with a clear division of labour.
  • However, if her husband is actively involved in the housework then the chance of divorce is better.
34
Q

Key Theorists - Parsons and Fletcher (1966): Divorce Rates

WHAT DO THEY ARGUE?

A
  • High rates of divorce do not prove that marriage is an institution under threat.
  • High rates of marriage and remarriage are simply a sign that people have higher expectations of marriage today.
35
Q

Key Theorist - Bernard (1976): Divorce Rates

WHAT DO THEY ARGUE?

A
  • The rise in divorce rates is evidence that women are becoming more aware of patriarchal oppression and accepting feminist ideas. This is a sign of progression.
36
Q

Key Theorist - Chester (1985): Cohabitation

WHAT DO THEY ARGUE?

A
  • Cohabitation is part of the process of getting married and is seen as a trial marriage.
37
Q

Key Theorist - Bejin (1985): Cohabitation as a Permanent Alternative

WHAT DO THEY ARGUE?

A

Argues that:

- For some young people, it is an attempt to create a more equal relationship, rather than a patriarchal marriage.

38
Q

Key Theorist - Macklin (1980): Relationship Between Cohabitation and Marriage

WHAT DO THEY ARGUE?

A

Argues that:

  • ‘Cohabiting couples’ covers a wide range of partnerships.
  • The relationship between marriage and cohabitation is complex.
39
Q

Key Theorist - Stonewall (2008): Same Sex Relationships

WHAT DID THEY ESTIMATE?

A

5%-7% of an adult population have same sex relationships.

40
Q

Key Theorist - Stein (1976): One Person Households

WHAT DO THEY ARGUE?

A
  • Some people choose to live alone.

- Some people may live alone because there are too few partners available in their age group (mainly widowers)

41
Q

Key Theorists - Duncan and Phillips (2008): One Person Households

WHAT DID THEY FIND?

A
  • 1 in 10 adults are ‘living apart together’.
  • This may reflect a trend towards less formalised relationships
  • Financial constraints also prohibit people from living together.
42
Q

Key Theorists - Ferri and Smith (1998): Reconstituted Families

WHAT DID THEY FIND?

A
  • Step families are similar to first families in all respects (childhood is a positive experience).
  • However, they are at a higher risk of poverty.
43
Q

Key Theorists - Allan and Crow (2001): Reconstituted Families

WHAT DO THEY ARGUE?

A
  • Step families have particular problems of divided loyalties and issues over contact with the non-residential parent.
44
Q

Key Theorist - McCarthy et al (2003): Reconstituted Families

WHAT DID THEY ARGUE?

A
  • You cannot generalise about all stepfamilies.

- There is diversity amongst them and some have tensions, but others do not.

45
Q

Key Theorist - Mirza (1997): Ethnicity and Family Patterns

WHAT DO THEY ARGUE?

A
  • The high rate of lone parents reflects the high value women place on independence.
46
Q

Key Theorist - Reynolds (1997): Ethnicity and Family Patterns

WHAT DO THEY ARGUE?

A
  • Official statistics are misleading - it may appear that there are a lot of lone parent families, when in reality, they are in stable relationships but do not cohabit.