Theorists Flashcards

1
Q

Clausewitz

A

Prussian general in Napoleonic wars; Wrote “On War”; “War is the continuation of politics [/policy/] by other means”; Most of “On War”, however, is devoted to operational art specific to the Napoleonic Wars, does not run together by common theme (the book was a compilation of Clausewitz’s personal papers discovered after his death) and is incomplete/ largely un-revised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

John Mearshiemer

A

“The Tragedy of Great Power Politics” Offensive structural realist. Powers are primed for offense, No state is likely to achieve permanent global hegemony. Constant great power competitions to maximize relative power.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Kenneth Waltz

A

“The Origins of War in Neorealist Theory”. The father of structural realism: States are the primary factor. All states function the same way; the way states function is irrelevant to the way the int’l system functions. Domestic criteria is irrelevant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Robert Jervis

A

“Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma” Anarchy encourages behavior that leaves everyone worse off. Incentives to defect are strong. the Security dilemma: one state’s gain in security invariably threatens another
States, given the right structural conditions, though, can cooperate to alleviate the security dilemma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Stacie Goddard

A

“When Might Makes Right” Why states underbalance in IR. Legitimation strategies: 1. Signal constraint. 2. Set Rhetorical Traps. 3. Resonate with a state’s “ontological security” Balancing is not automatic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hans Morgenthau

A

“Politics Among Nations”. Last of the Classical realists, where power is an end to itself and people seek it out solely to have it. Political realism is guided by objective laws.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Alexander Wendt

A

“The Social Construction of Power Politics” Creator of the constructivist theory. Identities and interests offer an alternative to both realism and liberalism. Power politics do not flow causally from anarchy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Robert Keohane

A

Interdependence through institutions (method by which institutions are “sticky”: the “lives of their own” that they take on spring from shared nexus at the institution)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

John Ikenberry

A

Liberal institutionalism. The Liberal character of America, and the institutions they helped create facilitate cooperation and overcome fears of domination or exploitation, which allows the U.S to maintain a hegemonic position through the use of liberalized institutions
The restraining effects of democractic polities and institutions reduces the incentives of states to engage in strategic rivalry or balancing against the US
Institutions are “sticky”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Edward Mansfield, Jack Snyder

A

“Democratization and the Danger of War”. Breakaway from Democratic Peace Theory” They contend that mature democracies will likely avoid confrontation with other democracies for a variety of reasons
However, democracies do not “mature overnight”, in a transitional stage, emerging democracies can be more war prone and volatile.
Arguably, the transition periods, either towards democracy or away from it, are the reason for greater degrees of conflict. Mature or stable democracies OR autocracies are likely to be more peaceful in foreign policy endeavors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Sebastian Rosato

A

“The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory” Democratic states have consistently violated liberal norms when deciding to go to war (ie instigating regime changes in Iran, Guatemala, Indonesia, Brazil, Chile, etc.)
The democratic nature of a state/a nation’s defined regime type is often contested, inaccurate, and subject to redefinition
Flaws in institutional logic: there is reason to believe that accountability doesn’t affect democratic leaders any more than autocratic ones. The later may be exiled, imprisoned or killed, and losing autocrats are more likely to suffer severe punishment than their democratic partners; autocratic leaders are constantly accountable to public opinion whereas democratic leaders accountable to elections over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bruce Russett

A
"Debating the Democratic Peace" Alternative explanations:
Institutional approach 
Transnationalism:
Distance Prevents War.  
Alliances Make Peace. 
Wealth Makes Peace. 
Political Stability Makes Peace.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Robert Gilpin

A

Hegemonic War Theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Jessica Weeks

A

“Strongmen and Straw Men” Can domestic institutions affect autocratic leaders decision making? Some types can be held accountable. Elite constrained dictatorships can be more peaceful than democracies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Martha Finnemore

A

“Constructing Norms of Humanitarian Intervention” The normative context of humanitarian interventions drive its use. Concepts of “Humanity” and sovereignty are fluid
Framework to critique Just War theory by

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Nina Tannenwald

A

“Stigmatizing the Bomb” the nuclear taboo, a norm, prevented nukes from becoming conventional. Can create precedents for use

17
Q

J.S Levy

A

Loss Aversion, framing and bargaining. 1st Image theorist.

18
Q

Graham Allison

A

Bureaucratic Politics Model. Model I, Model II, Model III