Theories/sociological perspectives Flashcards
How do functionalists see society?
as based on value consensus- a shared set of norms and values- shared culture enables members of society to co-operate harmoniously to meet society’s needs and achieve their common goals
What is the organic analogy and the functions of the family via functionalists?
- society as a biological organism- body is a system made up of different parts (cells, organs etc) that function together to meet society’s needs and maintain it- society is a system made up of different but interdependent parts or sub-systems, such as institutions like the education system, economy, religion, state etc- function of any part is the contribution it makes to maintaining the social system, as a whole
- they believe family plays a vital role in social systems as a whole as well as meeting needs of other sub-systems
- they take a positive view of the family- seeing it as performing a beneficial function both for wider society and all its individual members
What is the issue with the above?
functionalists assume the family is harmonious and ignore conflict and exploitation like child abuse etc
What are Murdock’s 4 functions of the family ?
- in 1949 he argued the nuclear family performs 4 essential functions for society and member:
- stable satisfaction of the sex drive with the same marital partner- this prevents the social disruption that would be caused by a sexual ‘free for all’
-Reproduction of next gen- without which society could not exist- workers needed - socialisation of the young- into society’s norms and values enables new members to integrate into society
- satisfaction of members econ needs- e.g. providing food and shelter. In pre-industrial societies, the family is a unit of production, but in modern societies it has become a unit of consumption only- beneficial as reduces reliance on others in society and stimulates independence
- these 4 functions performed- means the nuclear family helps maintain social stability- for Murdock ‘sheer practicability’ of the nuclear family as a way of meeting needs explain why it is universal
Is the nuclear family a universal institution as Murdock suggests?
- The Nayar: of south-west India, before 19thc. there was no nuclear family- women could have many sexual relations and biological father of children was therefore uncertain- the mother’s brother was responsible instead of looking after mother and children
- The Kibbutz: early kibbutzim- childrearing was separated as much as possible from the relationship, with kids kept apart from natural parents brought up in children’s houses- role of natural parent= limited, and only allowed to see children short periods each day- children seen as children of kibbutz responsible for community as a whole
- lone parent family- inc common in western societies, usually female headed
- Gay/lesbian families- more common- most with children tend to be Lesbian couples- also cases of gay men having kids via surrogate mother- known case of this -Sir Elton John- Civil partnership act 2004 have legal recognition to the relationship of same sex couples who enter a civil partnership, involving similar arrangements and legal marriage
What is Parsons functionalist fit theory?
- argues the kind of range of functions that the family performs depend on the type of society in which it is found- this also determines the kind of structure family has which Parson identifies as wither- the three-generational extended family, found in pre-industrial society or the two-generational nuclear family, found in modern industrial society
- extended-family was multi-functional- it was a unit both of production and of consumption, e.g. all members worked the land together, and it often performed welfare, military, religious or other functions
Nuclear family fits 2 key needs of modern industrial society:
-need for geographical mobility: contemporary society has a specialised division of labour, with a wide range of different occupations with different incomes and lifestyles- this means that the labour force needs to be geog mobile- move around nation to areas where skills are required improving education or gaining promotion -> often means leaving relatives behind weakening traditional extended family
- social mobility rate (in contemporary society): means ppl can move up or down the social scales compared to family born into- higher ascribed status then father for example. Family may find themselves in different jobs, with different education, income, lifestyle and opportunities and attitudes
- parson distinguishes between the male instrumental/breadwinning role and female expressive/nurturing role- sees it due to biological based as are better suited to expressive role
What are Parsons 2 irreducible or essential functions?
- primary socialisation of the young, equipping the next gen with basic skills and society’s value- he argued families taught social norms and values but specifically taught children- beneficial as instils basic discipline and controls human behaviour
- stabilisation of the adult personality - enabling adults to relax and release tensions so can return to workplace and perform roles efficiently- he provides a relaxing env- warm bath theory for male workers after work- beneficial to wider society as reduces stress and bad decisions due to stress
Other than geographic and social mobility, what are the other ways in which there is thought to have been a decline in extended family with the isolated nuclear family fitting contemporary society?
- growth in meritocracy in contemporary societies- now its ‘what you know’ over ‘who you know’ - extended kin therefore has less to offer this may be challenged via the upper class
- need to avoid possibility of econ and status differences in an extended family unit causing conflict and family instability- different occupations and lifestyles of extended family members may be conflict and instability within family via disputes over where to live after job opportunities arrive - links to geog mobility
- need to protect family stability by strengthening bonds between married and cohabiting couples- strong bond to develop with the couple- free time is spent by both partners doing jobs around home, TV and so on- family becomes a self-contained and more intimate unit
How may social policies reinforce functions of family?
- plans and actions of state agencies such as health, social services, aimed directly at families through laws governing marriage, divorce, abortion, adoption, child protection- laws could change norms or reinforce existing values- why older ppl have different values to younger
- gay marriage
How can functions of the family impact upon childhood experiences?
- functions such as socialisation affects childhood experiences as values likely to stick to them for life- if socialised different to other children- like class- bullying or stigmatisation could entail
How does globalisation impact the functions of the family?
- may change norms and values of society e.g. same sex couples could decrease importance of reproduction function for next gen in global scale
Criticism/evaluations of the functionalist perspective?
- Downplay functionalist: both Murdock and Parsons paint a very rosy picture of family life, presenting it as harmonious and integrated institution- however downplay conflict in family especially darker side such a domestic violence and child abuse-> children become emotionally disturbed
- out of date- Parson’s instrumental/expressive roles- may not be a case today- as women may be breadwinners- roles played by both partners at various times
- radical psychiatrists like Laing claimed to reveal reality behind normal family life was damaging and can cause schizophrenia- ‘mad’ ppl come from mad families
What is the Marxist view and its perspective of the family
- Marxists see capitalist society as based on an unequal conflict between 2 classes:
-capitalist class/Bourgeoisie- who own means of production- working class/Proletariat- own only their labour- forced to sell to capitalists in return for wages- exploitation- see all societies institutions as helping maintain class inequality/capitalism
What is the Marxist function of the family via Inheritance of property?
- as capitalism developed wealth began to inc , along with inc wealth came the development of private property as a class of men who emerged who were able to secure control of the means of production- this change eventually brought about patriarchal monogamous nuclear family
- Engels view is that monogamy became essential bc of inheritance of private property- men had to be certain of paternity of children in order to ensure that their legitimate heirs from them- monogamous nuclear family brought women’s sexuality under male control as economic security her husband had offered.
Evaluations of Engels’ theory
- based on unreliable historical evidence
- however his views convincing enough for 1917 Russian revolution- attempts to break away privatised family - govt also made things like divorce and abortion easier however under Stalin some of these had changed