Theories of romantic relationships: social exchange theory Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Social exchange theory

A

Assumes romantic partners act out of self-interest in exchanging rewards and costs
-Relationship satisfying when rewards exceed costs (profit) and potential alternatives are less attractive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who devised the social exchange theory

A

Thibault/Kelley

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Examples of rewards in relationships

A

-Emotional support
-Sex
-Companionship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Examples of costs in relationships

A

-Time
-Stress
-Energy
-Compromise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does opportunity cost mean

A

Investment of time/energy in current relationship means using resources that you cannot invest elsewhere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is comparison level

A

Amount of reward you believe you deserve

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is CL based on

A

-Past experiences
-Social norms

So constantly changing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How is self-esteem linked to CL

A

-Someone with low self-esteem has low CL so is satisfied with little profit/some costs
-Someone with higher self-esteem believed they are worth a lot more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How do we measure profit in romantic relationships

A

Comparison level
Comparison level for alternatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Comparison level for alternatives

A

Gives context for current relationship as we compare to others/being single
-SET predicts we will stay in current relationship if we believe it is more rewarding than alternatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Comparison level for alternatives

A

Gives context for current relationship as we compare to others/being single
-SET predicts we will stay in current relationship if we believe it is more rewarding than alternatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Four stages of relationship development

A

-Sampling stage
-Bargaining stage
-Commitment stage
-Institutionalisation stage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Sampling stage

A

We explore rewards and costs of social exchange by experimenting with them in our own relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Bargaining stage

A

Beginning of relationship
-Partners exchange rewards/costs and identify what is most profitable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Commitment stage

A

As time goes on sources of rewards and costs + predictable/relationship is more stable as rewards + and costs -

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Institutionalisation stage

A

Partners settled down as costs/rewards are fully established

16
Q

Strength of social exchange theory

A

Research support
-e.g Kurdek questionnaire found most committed partners perceived most rewards/fewest costs/viewed alternatives as unattractive

These findings match predictions from SET, confirming validity of theory in gay/straight partners

17
Q

Strength of social exchange theory

A

Research support
-e.g Kurdek questionnaire found most committed partners perceived most rewards/fewest costs/viewed alternatives as unattractive

These findings match predictions from SET, confirming validity of theory in gay/straight partners

18
Q

Counterpoint to research support

A

Studies ignore equity
-Much research support for role of equity- not just balance of rewards and costs but partner’s perceptions that this is fair

=SET is limited explanation which cannot account for significant proportion of research findings

19
Q

Weakness of SET

A

Claims that dissatisfaction arises only after relationship stops being profitable but Argyle argued that we don’t monitor costs/rewards/alternatives until after we are dissatisfied

Suggests that considering costs/alternatives is caused by dissatisfaction, rather than the reverse

20
Q

Weakness 2 of SET (vague concepts)

A

-Real-world psychological rewards/costs subjective/harder to define
-Unclear what the values of CL/CLalt must be before dissatisfaction threatens a relationship

=Theory is difficult to test in a valid way