Theories Of Romantic Relationships: SET Flashcards

1
Q

What does SET mean

A

Social exchange theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does SET assume

A

Relationships are guided by the minimax principle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Thibault and Kelley propose

A

Relationships could be explained in terms of economics - it is an exchange of goods or less tangible things such as doing a favour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How is satisfaction judged

A

In terms of profit - partners are motivated to minimise the costs to themselves whilst maximising rewards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What kind of relationships continue?

A

Profitable ones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Give some examples of a cost

A

Loss of time or stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Give some examples of a reward

A

Sex, praise or companionship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What else needs to be accounted for

A

Opportunity cost - the recognition that investment in a given relationship is at the cost of expending those resources somewhere else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a measure of profit

A

Comparison level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is comparison level

A

A judgment of the reward level we expect in a relationship, determined by relationship experiences and social norms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When will people generally pursue a relationship

A

When the CL is high (some people with low self esteem may have low CL’s)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is an additional measure of profit

A

CLalt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is CLalt

A

Comparison level for alternatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is comparison level for alternatives

A

Involves considering whether we might gain more rewards and endure fewer costs in a different relationship - assuming that we can only select one partner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When will people stay in a relationship

A

Despite alternatives, when we consider it is more rewarding that the alternatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Duck suggest

A

That here are always alternatives around - if costs of current relationship outweigh rewards then alternatives become more attractive

17
Q

What did Duck say about if we are in a satisfying relationship

A

We may not even notice the alternatives

18
Q

What are the four stages of a relationship

A
  1. Sampling stage
  2. Bargaining stage
  3. Commitment stage
  4. Institutionalisation stage
19
Q

What is the sampling stage

A

Involves exploring rewards and costs by experimenting in our relationship and observing others (not just romantic)

20
Q

What is the bargaining stage

A

Occurs at start of a relationship where romantic partners negotiate around costs and rewards

21
Q

What is the commitment stage

A

Where relationships become more stable, costs reduce and rewards increase

22
Q

What is the institutionalisation stage

A

When partners become settled because the norms of a relationship are established

23
Q

Name a limitation of SET

A

Assumes all relationships are exchange based - Clark and Mills

24
Q

What did Clark and Mills do

A
Argued that exchange relationships may involve profit (e.g. Work colleagues) 
Communal relationships (e.g. Romantic partners) involve giving and receiving of rewards without thinking of profit
25
What did Clark and Mills suggest
At the start of a romantic relationship tallying of exchanges might be viewed with some suspicion and even distaste
26
Why does the Clark and Mills study act as a limitation for SET
Suggests SET may not provide a suitable explanation for all types of relationships