theories of romantic relationships Flashcards
who did the social exchange theory
Thibault and Kelley
what is the social exchange theory
economic theory of costs and rewards
costs= stress
rewards= sex
what is the minimax principle
partners minimise their costs but maximise their rewards
what is the comparison level
comparing relationship to past ones, self worth, cultural norms
what is the comparison level for alternatives
wether a relationship with someone else would be more rewarding
what are the stages of a relationship
- sampling- explore costs/rewards
2.bargaining- negotiating them
3.commitment- stability
4.internalisation- norms
AO3 SET
+ Kurdeck. most commitment= most rewards.however equity theory contradicts
- Argyle says SET only applies to sapling stage. we only look for alternatives when costs outweigh rewards
+spreecher. if available partners increase then commitment and satisfaction decreases
who did the equity theory, what did they suggest
Hatfield.
relationships should be fair- a balance of costs and rewards
overbenefitters feel shame
underbenefitters feel anger
AO3 equity theory
+Utne. 118 newly weds. found equity= satisfaction. more valid than SET
-culture. Ryan compared couples in collectivist and individualistic cultures. individualistic satisfied with equity where as collectivists satisfied with overbenefitting
- ind. diff. Huseman. benevolent partners contribute more. entitled people want to over benefit. equity not necessary in every relationship
who did the investment model
Rusbult
what is commitment, which factors does it depend on
intention to carry a relationship on
depends on; satisfaction, quality of alternatives, investments (intrinsic or extrinsic)
maintenance mechanisms keep a relationship going, what are examples?
accommodation
forgiveness
willingness to sacrifice
positive illusions of partners qualities
ridiculing alternatives
AO3 investment model
- oversimplified. Goodfield and Agnew. more to investment than resources. Eg future plans. original model flawed
+ Lee and Agnew. women with investments stay in abusive relationships. commitment to inexplainable behaviour
-correlational
+ Rusbult. questionaire. 17 males. 17 females. as relationship develops investment increases resulting in greater commitment