Theories of late modernity Flashcards
What does the theory of late modernity argue?
- TLM - todays rapid changes are a continuation of modern society
- We are now in late or high modernity, key features of modernity have become intensified
- TLM subscribe to the enlightenment project
Giddens: reflexivity
Giddens states we are now in late modernity, it has two key features that encourage globalisation and rapid change?
- Disembedding - no longer need face to dace contact in order to interact, breaks down geographical barriers
- Reflexivity - tradition and custom no longer serve as a guide to how we should act. We are thus forced to become reflexive - to reflect on and modify our actions in the light of information about risks. This means we are continually re-evaluating our ideas
Giddens: reflexivity
Together Disembedding and Reflexivity account for?
Rapid and widespread nature of social change in high modernity
Beck - Risk
Acc to Giddens we now face what?
- New high consequence risks e.g. nuclear war, economic risk, global warming, which are a threat to our freedom
- All of these are man made or man manufactured
- Giddens rejects PM’s belief that we cannot interven to imporve things, he believes we can
Beck - Risk
Beck calls these?
Manufactured risks as they result from technology
Beck - Risk
Reflexive modernisation?
- Sees late modernity as a period of growing individualisation, in which we become increasingly reflexive
- Tradition now longer governs how we act
- As a result we have to think for ourselves and reflect on the possible consequences of our choice of action
Beck - Risk
Unlike postmodernists, Beck and Giddens argue we can make?
Rational plans based on objective knowledge to reduce these risk and achieve progress
Evaluation
- Reflectivity sujest we can reflect and change, however not everyone has that option (the poor)
- Ruskin criticises Beck saying its not technology thats the source of risk but capitalism with its pursuit of profit
HOWEVER, TLM DO PROVIDE A SOCIOLOGICAL ALTERNATIVE TO POSTMODERNISM. THEY SHOW THAT A RATIONAL ANALYSIS OF SOCIETY REMAINS POSSIBLE