THEORIES OF DEVELOPMENT Flashcards
PIAGET
A constructivist theory of cognitive development
Children are like little scientists - they construct their own knowledge through interacting with their environment.
A stage theory: children can’t progress from one stage to the next unless they’ve mastered certain milestones.
Who’s theory of cognitive development was ‘constructivist’
Piaget
How do schemas develop?
Through the dual process of assimilation and accommodation.
Accommodation
The adjustment of schemas to new input, leading to growing and changing knowledge (changing schema to accommodate new knowledge)
Assimilation
The integration of new input into existing schemas, leading to more consolidated knowledge.
What is a schema
Mental representations/sets of rules that enable children to interact with their world in a meaningful way.
- they make up our frames of reference through which we filter new information.
Examples of how schemas are developed
Develop through experience and become more complex with development.
Stage 1 of the four stages of Piaget’s theory
The SENSORIMOTOR stage (birth - 2 years)
= infants trying to conquer their sensory motor system
= able to interact more with their environment
Key milestones:
> Object permanence (@ end of first year)
> Mental Representation (final substage -> 18 - 24 months)
> Self-awareness/Recognition (18 months plus)
What is object permanence
The idea that things (objects or people) continue to exist even when they’re out of sight.
What is mental representations
The ability to hold information in their heads without it being immediately present.
The building blocks of pretend play and memory
What is self-awareness/Recognition
The ROUGE test
Knowing their legs and arms are theirs
Making a connection between the self and the person in the mirror.
Stage 2 of the four stages of Piaget’s theory
The PRE-OPERATIONAL stage (2 - 7 years)
Subdivides into:
> Preconceptual/symbolic function substage (2-4 years)
- mentally representing an object that isn’t physically present
- expands childs’ mental world - evidence of this in pretend play
- egocentrism reduces
- understanding that other people’s mental states may differ from their own.
> Intuitive thought substage (4-7 years)
- a shift in children’s reasoning
- children begin to classify, order and quantify in a more systematic manner.
- ALTHOUGH, they do remain unaware of the underlying principles and what they know.
t/f children’s reasoning based largely on perception + intuition rather than rational thinking.
- children develop symbolic thought
- yet to be able to conserve for liquids and solids but can for mass and number.
Stage 3 of the four stages of Piaget’s theory
The CONCRETE OPERATIONS stage (7 - 12 years)
- children become more flexible and are able to focus on more than one thing at a time
- their thinking is h/e still v concrete, not abstract.
- towards the end of this stage, children develop the ability for metacognition - thinking about thinking.
- children can conserve, classify and categorise in multiple domains inc. liquids + solids.
> using strategies like: compensation, reversibility.
- also now start grasping cause and effect relations rather than using their egocentrism
- their thinking is still concrete, not abstract
Stage 4 of the four stages of Piaget’s theory
The FORMAL OPERATIONAL stage (12+ years)
- when children become able to reason hypothetically (without objects present) ie. not concrete thinking
- they can reason with verbal hypotheses + deduce conclusions from abstract statements.
- hypothetic reasoning - ie. if i do X, Y will happen.
Evaluate Piaget’s work - limitations of his work
- Often worked with just children
- Problems with replicating his findings because he quite often didn’t write down the exact methods he was using
- Development isn’t as fixed as Piaget thought - it’s a lot more fluid + lots of influences.
- Experimental setup - not child friendly
- Underestimated children’s ability for object permanence and mental representations - these may actually be available from a much younger age.
- Children emerge as more competent than Piaget’s work would suggest.