theories of crime Flashcards
the dark figure of crime
unreported and unrecorded crime
due to:
low consequence crime
lack of trust in police
individuals feel that nothing can be done
sensitive nature of crime.
official crime statistics
e.g. CS for england and wales/police formally recorded crime statistics.
do not include:
serious crimes
those unreported to the police
police formally recorded crime statistics
how have crime rates changed?
steep rise in the 1960’s- may be due to changes in how easily crime could be reported
previously less police- less reported crime- society less controlled.
steadily decreasing since 1995 but many adults seem to think that crime rates have increased.
reasons why people may be encouraged to report crime
-why people may not report crime
encouraged to report crime:
straightfoward crijme- perpatrator known
rewards
have been a victim
why crime may not be reported-
lack of trust in police (common among criminals and ethnic minority)
belief that it will not make any difference
low conseqeuence crime
sensitive nature of crime e.g. domestic violence.
functionalist durkheim
crime is functional and normal but there still needs to be social control mechanisms
higher crime rates in advanced industrial societies
crime occurs as there is not equal committment to collective sentiment/conscience
2 functions of crime:
allows society to change, move and become better.
restore society from anomie/normlessness by reminding them what is right and wrong- boundary maintenance.
evaluation of durkheim
doesn’t consider negative imapcts of crime on victim.
interactionists- too deterministic
does not include how/why society’s meaning of crime changes/the role of society’s reaction to crime
durkheim sees crime as society’s expression of moral sentiment
conflict theorists would disagree.
cohen
deviance is a safety valve- providing a harmless expression of discontent.
certain forms of deviance act as a warning signal that certain parts of society are malfunctioning
davis and polsky
porn and prostitution is a way for men to allievate their sexual frustration compared to ways that would threaten the family e.g. having an affair
merton
crime is not due to physcological personalities, but the social structure
value consensus includes cultural goals to be achieved through institutionalised/accepted means.
not everyone is in an equal position to reach these goals through accepted means.
american dream in USA during 1930’s- success measured by material wealth was the goal
-more focus on achieving the goal rather than the way you reached it.
-leads to anomie/normlessness
different reactions depending on position within social structure.
evaluation of merton
taylor- merton ignores power relations- who creates laws and who it benefits
marxists- merton ignores white collar, corporate and state crime.
cohen- deliquent subcultures
subcultures develop alternative norms and values from the rest of society e.g. a group that has norms that encourages and rewards criminal behaviour
cohen criticises merton in 2 ways:
deliquency is a group rather than individual response.
merton does not account for non utiliarian crime/crime that has no real gain e.g. vandalism. He questioned whether this crime was due to the mainstream culture
deliquent subcultures experience status frustration- they feel they are denied status by the rest of society.
they develop alternate values- provides a different way of gaining status.
response to the common problems faced by lower working class adults
they live in deprived areas, attend the worst schools and have the least chance in the job market.
not just about achieveing cultural goals but about the positive rewards e.g. recognition and prestige/successful performance within the subculture.
merton and cohen both started from a structural perspective- inequality in society puts more pressure on social groups in society to deviate.
millar- focal concerns
deviance is due to ineffective socialisation or socialisation into norms and values which leads to deviance.
trouble- trying to stay out of trouble is routine and expected as well as getting in trouble
smartness- street smart
autonomy- wanting to be in control of oneself- this is why W/C pupils remain at the bottom of the hierarcy as they act rebellious
excitement- thrill seeking and risk taking.
toughness- physical prowess and bravery
masculinity, endurance and strength.
fate- seeing the future as predetermined and hence inevitable.
evaluation of cloward and ohlin
-venkatesh- found evidence of organised criminal subcultures in chicago
south- supply of drugs in the UK is based on something very similar to conflict subcultures.
winlow- supports discussion of violence in relation to male criminal subcultures
matza- drift theory- most deliquents conform to the mainstream values and only drift to crime occassionaly or in special circumstances.
interactionist goffman
labelling theorists focus on the fact that we have all done something in our lives that is illegal but due to luck, cunning, deception or other means, it has been concealed from the public.
-discreditable but has not been discredited.
-real difference is between discredited and discreditable
-criminals have the bad luck of being caught and subjected to penal process that results in spoiled identity/they have been discredited
cloward and ohlin
-merton ignores illegitimate opportunity structure
-runs parallel to the legal one
-exists on three levels- criminal, retreatist and conflict subculture
criminal subculture- cohesive, stable working class community
connections in both the mainstream and legal world and illegal world. E.g. enables stolen goods to be sold in the wider community
crime stages based on age e.g. stealing car aerials and radios at 14 and progressing to more advanced world of crime at 20.
provides an alternative for working class males than legitimate job market.
conflict- when the previous conditions are not met and crime is not possible, frustration is expressed through violence. happens in slums on the edge of cities e.g. LA and New York
retreatist- final stage
double fail- both crime and violence.
retreating to drugs and alcohol
paid through via small crimes, theft and prostitution.
interactionist lemert
like becker, lemert sees society’s reaction to deviance as important.
primary deviance- relatively fruitless to investigate
not very important
primary deviance- deviant acts before they are publically labelled.
secondary deviance-
deviance occurs due to society’s reaction to it/acts are not deviant unless labelled as deviant.
when he studied american indian communities that focused on speech as this was part of the culture.
children would recite rituals from a young age and focus on history of great speakers- children more likely to have stutter
in communities where there was less of a focus on speech- children were less likely to have a stutter.
interactionist becker
-acts are not deviant until they are lablled as deviant
-whether something is labelled as deviant depends on the audience and their assumptions.
in low income neighbourhoods- fights- individuals labelled as deliquents
in rich neighbourhoods- labelled as rich youthful spirits.
labels are a master status
they influence how we are perceived, responded to and our interactions with others.
self concepts influenced by interactions with others so we see ourselves in terms of labels
can lead to a self fulfilling prophecy.
example for interactionist becker’s theory
an individual is publically labelled- so they are excluded from social groups
this leads to further deviant behaviour as they are denied ordinary means of everyday life e.g. getting a job
so they are forced to turn to illegitimate means out of neccessity.
deviant career when individuals join organised deviant group
within the group, a deviant subculture develops.
jock young
looks at meanings that coloured reaction to hippies
hippies are seen by the police as idle, scruff and troublemakers.
the hippies see themselves as different and they become united.
they develop deviant self concepts and exclude themselves from conventional society.
-retreat into a small confined group.
drug use becomes less of a periphery activity and more of a central concern, especially as the police punish the deviance that they helped to create, more.
disintergrative shaming
society has a process for dealing with offenders- they are excluded as outsides- it is difficult for them to intergrate back into society.
reintergrative shaming
since 2000’s in engalnd and wales there is a circle of support and accountability
accountability/sex offender taking responsibility
circle- volunteers from the local community surrounding the offender, who is the core member
it teaches the offender skills and practical lesssons e.g. hobbies and interests/where to find accomodation etc.
becker
new laws are created by moral entreprenurs who wanted to translate social values into new laws/policies
they may enlist the help of media organistaions and channels in a moral crusade.
evaluation of interactionism
interactionists definition of deviance is illogcal as they say deviance is based on societal reaction
Functionalists- murder is not an issue due to societal reaction
-too determinstic
akres- individuals think other membres of society mind their own business but people are labelled with stimgatised labels so have no choice but to become deviant.
-doesn’t explain why people are deviant
lemmert- primary deviance should not be considered as it is common and does not impact self concept
-does not explain why some people are labelled rather than others- fails to consider the power of certain social groups.
ethnomethodology and phenomenology
ethnometholdolgoy was created from phenomenology and the work of Garnfinkl
does not focus on causal explanations but understanding phenomena.
try to understand why acts/individauls are labelled as deviant.
how this theory can be used to explain a coroner assessing whether the cause of death was suicide
common sense knowledge is used to inform meanings e.g. a mentally ill person/socially isolated is likely to have commited suicide.
this idea is a social construct but is reinforced when the coroner rules deaths of a similar pattern as suicide.
indexicality and reflexivity
indexicality- there are no fixed meanings and it depends on the context
this threatens the social order as if they are no set meanings, how do we communicate?
-through reflexivity.
ciroucel
labelling a young person as deviant is not simple, clear cut and unproblematic
1st stage- police deciding to stop and interrogate young person
depends on what they see as the typical deliquent
interrogation does not always lead to arrest
if arrested, what the probation officer sees as a typical deliquent influences whether they are prosecuted
deviance is created by the agencies of social control
certain individuals are interrogatted, processed and labelled as deviant
justice- negotiation in the interaction process.
marxism
conflict theory
basis of theory- on social structure that creates deviance
economic base/infrastructure shapes the rest of society
function of society- reinforce exploitative, unequal division of wealth between bourgeoisie and proletariat.
laws on deviance and crime are created by ruling class- so deviance in the eyes of who?
law maintains fiction of fairness while benfitting the ruling class
selective law enforcement.
bonger
like marx, belives that humanity is fundamentally altruistic/unselfish
capitalism is an economic organisation that makes humanity greed and selfish
quinney
what we know as criminal will dissapear with capitalism.
in a social utopia, there will be no greed and profit seeking.
there will be no ruling class to criminalise the activities of the working class
marxist snider
general marxist view- who commits crime and who gets caught?
working class crime is heavily policed while other crime is ignored.
many of the most serious anti social and predatory crimes in modern industrial socities are corporate crimes.
the effect of corporate crimes are actually more serios than street crimes
white collar crime- sutherland
trying to challenge the stereotype that crime is only a working class phenomenon.
white collar crime is a crime committed by a person with high social status and respectability in the course of their occupation