Theodicy Flashcards

1
Q

Outline Augustinian theodicy.

A

(soul-deciding)
Moral evil results from the fall of man and the angels. God created the world ex nihilo and corruption will see the universe return to its original state of nothingness. Augustine was heavily influenced by Plato who believed in perfect concepts of each thing in existence (shown through the analogy of Plato’s cave). Augustine believed in the word of the Bible as literal truth and that when God created the world it was good. “God saw all that He had made and it was good”. (Genesis).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Outline the fall of man and its effects in Augustinian theodicy.

A

As Adam turned away from God, he created original sin. All subsequent humans were seminally present in his loins, meaning we are all predisposed to committing sin (concupiscence).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Outline the fall of the angels with relevance to Augustinian theodicy.

A

The fall of the angels was repeated in the fall of Adam and Eve. Although humans contained no evil, they were created with the capacity to be corrupted as they were not perfectly good.
“For when the will abandons what is above itself and turns to what is lower, not because that is evil to which it turns but because the turning itself is wicked.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define Felix Culpa in connection with Augustinian theodicy.

A

Felix Culpa means to derive good from evil and was outlined by Augustine as a permission of evil in defence of free will. It is better to bring good out of evil than never to permit any evil to exist. Original sin provides the presence of moral evil, which is the cause of God’s sending Jesus. Life is a chance to seek redemption through Christ, meaning original sin is necessary for redemption.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe the way evil works as a privatio boni.

A

Evil defined as a privatio boni or privation of good, means evil is a mere falling away from goodness. Part of goodness is the variety of things that exist in a kind of hierarchy. Difference entails that some things will be more limited than others. The universe was created with the ability to be corrupted, but this is not an evil in of itself, meaning god did not create evil ex nihilo, and evil’s existence is only a result of man’s own creation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why does God allow us free will according to Augustinian theodicy?

A

God is like a parent. He loves us and wants the best for us, so allows us free will. We make bad decisions, but we learn from them; free will is the most loving gift.
Julian of Norwich: “As truly as God is our Father, so truly God is our Mother.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does free will allow for humanity?

A

The inability to do bad deeds makes good deeds redundant. Free will allows humans to choose good deeds. We are moral agents, given fee will by God and therefore possessing the ability to choose a relationship with Him culminating in eternal life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How does Plantinga develop Augustinian theodicy?

A

“God’s creation of agents with morally significant free will is something of tremendous value. God could not eliminate much of the evil and suffering in this world without thereby eliminating the greater good of having created persons with free will…”
The evils that exist are smaller in value than a greater good to which they are intimately connected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does Eleonore Stump support Augustinian theodicy?

A

(Supports the view that original sin generates evil)
Natural evil takes away a person’s self-satisfaction. Evil cannot guarantee faith in God, but the humility induced by natural evil aims to bring men into such a state.
Subsequent to Adam and Eve’s creation of original sin, God providentially uses both kinds of evil to bring about the greatest good that a fallen human can experience: a repaired will and eternal union with God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Outline Irenaean theodicy.

A

Relies on eschatological verification. The world was deliberately created with a mixture of good and evil. Good is a qualitative judgement, meaning there have to be other, less good things for goodness to exist at all. There must be evil in the world for us to appreciate good.
Evil in the world allows us to develop as individuals, entering a mature and free relationship with God.
We grow as individuals through tackling problems, making mistakes, persevering and being patient. Evil is soul-making and exists necessarily.
Irenaeas believd in the exact word of the Bible, using the quote “…in His own image and likeness…” as a foundation of his theodicy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Compare and contrast the qualities of God’s image and likeness according to Irenaean theodicy.

A

God’s image means we have freedom of choice, enabling us to be moral agents; we have moral autonomy.
God’s likeness means we have to develop and mature to reach our full potential.
We can only reach God’s likeness if we learn to overcome difficulties, cope with our own imperfections/ limitations and resist real temptation to do wrong.
Humanity can only achieve God’s likeness after death. Everyone should eventually complete their spiritual development and maturity to achieve the likeness of God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Outline the Analogy of the Mother Feeding with relevance to Irenaean theodicy.

A

(Aims to actualise the analogy of God’s image and likeness)
“For as it certainly is in the power of a mother to give strong food to her infant (but she does not do so), as the child is not yet able to receive more substantial nourishment.”
It is possible for God Himself to have made man perfect from the first, but man could not receive this perfection being “as yet and infant”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Outline the relevance of Jonah and the Whale to Irenaean theodicy.

A

(Aims to resolve the problem of evil and suffering)
“For as He patiently suffered Jonah to be swallowed by the whale… having been cast out again, he might be more subject to God…”
Even if we cannot see the reason for it, we must understand that evil is logically necessary for good.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How can humans achieve goodness according to Irenaean theodicy?

A

Humans should allow to mould them into perfection by working in faith towards God. Part of being good is an effort of will; agape in action (charity) is reliant on suffering.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How does Hick support Irenaeas?

A

(Evil and the God of Love)
Describes Irenaen theodicy as soul-making, referencing Keat’s idea that the world is a proving ground for human beings to earn salvation.
In order to be truly free, humans were created at an epistemic distance from God. This means that humans were placed in a situation where God’s existence and non-existence are equally likely, allowing humans the true freedom to exist.
Hick’s Irenaen soul-making theodicy argued that God allows evil and suffering in order to develop humans into virtuous creatures capable of following His will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How does Adams develop Irenaean theodicy?

A

On the Christian worldview, the direct experience of “face-to-face” intimacy with God is not only the highest good we can aspire to enjoy, but is also an incommensurable good- more precisely it is incommensurable with respect to only merely temporal evils or goods.
Apostle Paul: “our present sufferings are not worth comparing with the glory that will be revealed in us.”

17
Q

How does Eleonore Stump support Irenaean theodicy?

A

(Supports eschatological verification)
Evil and suffering is “conducive to bringing about both the initial human [receipt of God’s gift of salvation] and also the subsequent process of sanctification.”
Evil cannot guarantee faith in God, but the humility achieved by suffering aims to bring a man to such a state (link to Hick’s epistemic distance).

18
Q

How do process theologians respond to the problem of evil and suffering?

A

Process Theologians reject God’s absolute omnipotence, saying He has some power over the universe, but not the ability to eradicate evil and suffering.
This evades Mackie’s inconsistent triad, compromising on God’s omnipotence.
Rejected by many theists believing in God’s transcendence.

19
Q

How does Nygren respond to the problem of E+S?

A

It is wrong for theists to attempt a theodicy because it is irreligious to imagine that fallible human minds can understand God.

20
Q

How does Hick respond to Nygren?

A

Christians try to understand evil because it is central to other aspects of faith (sin, redemption, etc.)

21
Q

How does Russel respond to the problem of E+S?

A

(Problem of E+S only applicable to theists)
The universe requires no explanation, it is just the way it is, including evil and suffering.

22
Q

How does Wykestra critique Rowe’s argument?

A

Given our cognitive limitations, we are in no position to judge as improbable the statement that there are goods beyond our ken secured by God’s permission of many of the evils we find in the world.

23
Q

How does D.Z Phillips critique theodicy?

A

It is never acceptable to harm someone in order to help them.
The theodicies of Irenaeas, Hick, Swinburne, and others don’t provide a satisfactory understanding of God/ evil and suffering. Phillips claimed these theodicies actually contributed to the evil.
“[Swinburne] tries to justify the existence of horrendous evils, by saying that we need them in order to grow deeply in responding to them… Here is a clear instance where a theodicy, in the very language it employs, actually adds to the evil it seeks to justify.”
“in making one’s life a sacrifice to God, one approaches the reality of God- that is the kind of reality God has. God is not real in any other kind of way.”

24
Q

How does Schleiermacher critique theodicy?

A

Argued there is a logical contradiction in the claim that evil could be created as a privatio boni, claiming that the idea of a perfect world becoming corrupted is a logical fallacy. (supported by evolutionary and geological evidence suggesting not that the world was made perfect and has become corrupted, but that the world developed order from chaotic beginnings).
Augustinian theodicy requires evil to have created itself ex nihilo. This is logically impossible (ex nihilo, nihil fit). Even as a ‘privation’ evil is still a real feature of the world that can be attributed to God. Either God created the world imperfect or he allowed it to become corrupted.
Adam and Eve knew not to eat the apple, meaning right and wrong were established prior to original sin- proving evil and suffering are not necessary for morality.
A perfect human would be able to sin, but wouldn’t do so. Adam and Eve were not created equal, so God is to blame.

25
Q

Give the scientific errors critiquing Augustinian theodicy.

A

-It is impossible that all humans were seminally present in the loins of Adam.
-It is biologically improbable for all humans to have descended from a single pair.
-Sin is not genetically inherited, nor contagious.
All of these appear to disprove inheritance of original sin.

26
Q

How is the concept of humanity descending from a single pair supported by science?

A

Mark Stoeckle and David Thaler studied the development of animal life, concluding that 90% of all animal species descend from parents that started giving birth regularly around 250,000 years ago, suggesting the possibility that all humans descend from a single pair.

27
Q

Give some additional logical objections to Augustinian theodicy.

A

-An omnibenevolent God cannot save some and damn others to hell. God appears to have prepared for their fall with His creation of hell from the outset.
-If God foresaw our fall, it was immoral to allow it.
-It is often the innocent who suffer, so evil is not punishment for sin.
-Does God condemn unbaptised infants as sinners?
-Augustine was a literalist. Many now see the creation story as a myth.

28
Q

How does Hick defend Augustine?

A

If scripture is understood as non-literal/ mythological, historical claims to creation and fall are speculous.

29
Q

Give some logical criticisms of Irenaeas.

A

-Ideas of inherited behaviour are compatible with the Hebrew idea of Yetzer Hara (Richard Dawkins). This is the inherent tendency/ inclination towards evil. However, displays of evil are inconsistent across humanity. If evil is inherited, shouldn’t all displays be the same?
-If we can only reach maturity in another life, why didn’t God simply make our earthly spans much longer so we could reach the Celestial City while on earth? Is there any evidence for other lives?
-Couldn’t greater goods be gained without such evil and suffering? As a Christian theodicy, it appears to make the role of Jesus as saviour unnecessary/ superfluous.