Themis Essay 814 Flashcards
Whether a principal is liable on an instrument signed by an agent turns in part on
whether the agent had authority, either actual or apparent.
If the agent is authorized, the principal is
liable whether the agent signed the principal’s name, the agent’s own name, or both.
If the agent is not authorized,
the principal generally will not be liable.
Even if an agent acts with no power to bind the principal, the principal can
ratify an act performed by another person, whether or not the person is an actual agent of the principal.
Ratification occurs when a principal
affirms a prior act that was done or purported to be done on the principal’s behalf.
The principal’s affirmation may be either
express or implied (such as through conduct), and consideration is not required.
An accommodation party is
a surety, or one who guarantees the debt of another.
In order to be an accommodation party,
a person cannot have received a direct benefit from the instrument.
An accommodation party is liable
on the instrument in whatever capacity he has signed.
Under the UCC, if a party’s obligation to pay an interest is secured by an interest in collateral and the person entitled to enforce the instrument impairs the value of the interest in the collateral,
the obligations of an accommodation party are discharged to the extent of the impairment.
The burden of proving the impairment in the value of an interest in collateral
is on the party asserting the discharge.
Impairing the value of an interest in collateral includes:
(i) failure to obtain or maintain perfection or recordation of the interest in collateral;
(ii) release of collateral without substitution of collateral of equal value;
(iii) failure to perform a duty to preserve the value of collateral owed to a debtor or surety or other person secondarily liable; or
(iv) failure to comply with applicable law in disposing collateral.
An accommodation party is liable on the instrument only if:
(i) the person entitled to enforce the instrument has reduced his claim to judgment against the other party and execution is returned unsatisfied;
(ii) the other party has become insolvent;
(iii) the other party cannot be served with process; or
(iv) it appears useless to proceed against the other party.