Themis Essay 4528 Flashcards
Under the Fifth Amendment, an incriminating statement obtained as the result of custodial interrogation may not be used against the suspect at a subsequent trial unless
the police provided procedural safeguards effective to secure the privilege against self-incrimination (i.e., informed the suspect of his Miranda rights).
A Miranda violation does not automatically require the suppression of incriminating statements which are
made by the defendant after subsequently receiving a Miranda warning.
The U.S. Supreme Court has held that a second confession may be suppressed when
the circumstances indicate that the substance of Miranda has been drained away.
Objective Test for Miranda Suppression (SCOTUS plurality):
whether a reasonable person in the suspect’s position would not have understood the Miranda warnings to convey a message that the suspect retained a choice about whether to remain silent.
Subjective Test for Miranda Suppression (single deciding justice):
whether the police acted with an intent to circumvent the purpose of the Miranda warnings.