Theme D – War, Peace & Conflict Flashcards
Causes of War:
- Self defence
- Protect civilians
- Gain land
- Gain resources e.g. oil
- Seek revenge
- Gain power
- Establish justice
- Overthrow a corrupt government
- For a religious aim
Consequences of war
- Loss of human life
- Environmental damage
- Destruction of buildings
- Sickness
- Poverty
- Gain/loss of power
- Economic gain/loss
- Homelessness
- Slavery
- Liberation
- Refugee
Christian Views on War- OLD TESTAMENT
• God punishes those who murder people
• 10 Commandments – “you shall not
murder” (Exodus)
• However, God allowed violence in war as
he ordered His people to prepare for war
to defend people and nations
• God will bring absolute peac
Christian views on war- NEW TESTAMENT
• Jesus used righteous anger in the temple
(flipped tables) so ok to use violence to
stop corruption
• Jesus said peacemakers will be blessed
• Jesus was a pacifist
Just war theory
The Just War Theory was written by St. Thomas Aquinas in 1224 and
used by the Catholic Church to determine if a war was right or wrong.
The Catholic Church still use his criteria today, and it has also been
accepted by major world organisations such as the United Nations.
Jus as Bellum rules
For a war to be just, it must be started by a legitimate authority
There must be a reasonable chance of success
The war must be a last resort
The benefits of the war must outweigh the harm it will cause
Jus in bello rules
No civilians must be purposefully targeted
Unnecessary destruction must be avoided
Only proportional force should be used
Jus Post Bellum rules
There must be no revenge taken afterwards
Only the people responsible should be punished
The war should end for a justifiable reason
Evaluating The Just War Theory- STRENGTHS
• The Catholic Church and UN still use the
Just War Theory
• Good starting point to agree on whether
war is justified or not
• Encourages to think about morality of a
war before fighting
• Helps to minimise violence and
destruction
• Promotes dignity of human life
Evaluating the Just War theory- WEAKNESSES
• Outdates and unhelpful as any war could
be justified
• The Jus in Bello and Jus Post Bellum try to
protect those who are not guilty
• It fails to set clear boundaries on rules
• Can be open to abuse
Examples of War and JWT
WW2 – Jus in Bello – the War started to stop Hitler
However, civilians were targeted in bombings over Europe
Types of WMD:
- Nuclear Weapons – atomic
bombs that cause
immediate destruction and
radioactive - Biological warfare –
weapons which contain and
spread diseases to cause
illness or death - Chemical warfare – use of
chemicals on land and
people which cause death or
illness e.g. nerve agents like
Agent Orange - Radiological Weapons –
dirty bombs, bombs which
use conventional explosives
but dispense radioactive
material
Arguments FOR weapons of mass destruction
- They are a nuclear deterrent so could warn other countries off attacking you
- They provide jobs
- The use of nuclear bombs ended
WW2 (Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs in 1945) so they can lead to good
Arguments AGAINST weapons of mass destruction
- They cost trillions of f to make, store and replace
Having them, could lead you to use them which will cause death and destruction
The person who releases the weapon will not feel the impact so could make people careless
Catholic View WMD
Pax Christi – Catholic peace organisation that are
working for nuclear disarmament
Sanctity of life – life is sacred so should be protected
WMD do not fit with the Just War Theory
“The use or possession of nuclear
weapons is unjustifiable” – Pope Francis
2019
‘crime against God” – Catechism of the Catholic
Church
Quaker view WMD
They believe God is in every person so WMD take away
life
Quakers work for global disarmament
Quaker Statement 1995 –
“we urge all
governments to face the mess humans are
making of our world”
“nuclear weapons are faithless and sinful” –
Quaker Statement 2017
Right to Protest in the UK
In the UK, we have a democratic right to protest. This means that individuals and groups have the right to publicly
demonstrate their point of view. Protests can legally involve marches, speeches, processions, leafletting, and “sit-
ins”.
For a protest to be legal, it must be non-violent; the protesters must not plan to use violence of any kind or
encourage violence in any way. Legal protests are also not allowed to be intimidating towards other people. If a
protest breaks these conditions, then the police have the right to intervene, shut the protest down, and fine or
arrest protestors.
Some protest groups are purposefully violent. Supporters of these protests believe that violence is the only way
to get their message across or to communicate the strength of their feeling. They believe that their cause is worth
any punishment they might receive (usually a fine or an arrest)
Case Study – Violent Protest
The London Riots, were a series of “protest riots” in
London in August 2011. A legal and peaceful protest
started in Tottenham, London, following the death of
Mark Duggan, a local man who was shot dead by police.
The protest however descended into a week of rioting,
which saw looting and arson, as well as the deaths of five
people as a result of the ongoing violence
Case Study – Non-Violent Protest
The ”Montgomery bus boycott” was a peaceful protest
organised by Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks in
Montgomery, Alabama in the 1950s.
Laws in Alabama (and many other US states) stated that
black people must give up their seats on public transport
for white people. The protests were sparked by the arrest
of Rosa Parks who refused to give up her seat on the bus
to a white man. The black citizens of Montgomery
boycotted public transport for over a year, forcing a
change in the law by financially crippling the bus
companies
Arguments in support of VIOLENT protest
• It might get the message heard
quickly
• Violent events might get more news
coverage
Arguments in support of PEACEFUL protest
• It follows the law
• People respect non-violent protests
more as the message of the protest
will be listened to
• It doesn’t cause harm to others
• Violence never solves anything, it
causes more problems
• Peaceful protests in history such as
the Bus Boycott in 1955 changed
history and Civil Rights in America
Christian Views on Protest
- Righteous Anger by Jesus – even Jesus got angry for good reasons in the Cleansing of the Temple but
he didn’t hurt other people.
Matthew 21: 12-14 Jesus went into the Temple and drove out all those who were buying and selling there; he
overturned the tables of the moneychangers and the stools of the sellers, and said to them, “It is written in
the Scriptures that God said, ‘My Temple will be called a house of prayer.’ But you are making it a
hideout for thieves!” - Pope Francis speaking to reporters in Italy in January 2020. Though the Black Lives Matter protests were
addressed in the interview as were ongoing protests in Italy over government reform, the Pope made it clear that
his comments applied to all protests, not a specific group, organisation, or aim. “Protestors must operate in
favour of dialogue” - “No one who wants change can use violence” – Archbishop of York
- “Love thy neighbour” – Mark – violence hurts others and does not show agape (selfless love)
A war that is fought for religious reasons.
In this sense, a “holy war” is any war in which
religion is a key reason for the fighting. This could
include:
• To defend your right to practice your faith
• To defend the right of others to practice their
faith
• To protect or save people from religious
persecution
• To force your religion on others
• To protect others from having a different
religion to their own being forced upon
A war in which people believe they are doing what
God wants
In this sense, a “holy war” is a war fought by religious
people who believe the war is what God wants, or
who believe God has commanded them to fight.
There are examples in scripture of God commanding
armies to attack – sometimes to free or save people,
sometimes to punish people, sometimes to gain
some land that has been promised to a certain group
of people by God.
In this type of war, the fighters would feel that their
violence is justified or sanctioned by God