theme 6- fate and the gods Flashcards
the presentation and roles of fate
Homeric fate is not all-encompassing. It deals only with death/destruction, either of individuals or of communities. It is unavoidable, as expressed clearly in a metaphor of Book 4: ‘Fate shackled Diores’ – followed quickly by the man’s death.
fate in book 9
A confusing aspect of Homer’s presentation of Fate arises in Book 9, where we are confronted with the two fates of Achilles. Think about this for a moment and it should be clear that this doesn’t make much sense. As such, it requires some explanation. GRAZIOSI thinks that Achilles – the only source for the idea that Achilles has two fates – is simply deluding himself.
roman critic longinus on the depiction of the gods
'’homer has done his best to make the men in the iliad gods and the gods mem’’
xenophonies critic on the perception of the gods
'’homer and hesiod have attributed to the gods all things that are shameful and a reproach: thevery, adultry and deception of one and other’’
functions of the gods to explain why they’re depicted this way
- as explanations of natural phenomena (zees thunderbolts)
-acting as personification (Aphrodite sex and lust/Ares god of war)
-receivers of human sacrifice
gods acting as parental figures
-achillies asking his mum Thetis to supplicate zeus, ‘‘remind zeus of this now and sit beside him, take his knees asking that it may be his will to bring aid to the trojans’’ (book 1)
-zeus reaction to his son sarpidon death
the roles of fate, to create tragedy
This is clearly the case in Homer’s use of fate in the build-up to Patroclus’ death in Book 16. Fate’s unavoidability gives poetic nicety to Homer’s tragic foreshadowing. We also see this elsewhere, e.g., with the death of Hector, Book 22 (Zeus’ scales
the roles of fate, to point up hectors flaw
It is denial of his alleged fate that is H’s great mistake. Disregarding Patroclus’ warning, thinks he is a match for Achilles (Book 16), causing him to keep his army in the field when Achilles returns to battle (Book 18). This is linked directly with his death in Book 22
the roles of fate, to dramatize achillies decision not to fight in book 9
The notion that A uniquely has two possible fates which he must choose between gives an extra starkness and significance to his choice in Book 9 not to fight.
a possible problem; achillies two fates
The idea that Achilles has two fates (Bk 9) is only related to us by Achilles himself, even though he specifies his mother as his source.
The philosophical problems of having two fates are obvious. What if Achilles is simply deluding himself? This is GRAZIOSI’s (2016) view.
This is of course possible. But is it likely?
Achilles does cite his divine mother as his source for the two fates idea.
His genuinely having two fates has an artistic function (see previous slide).
Achilles never has trouble accepting his fate (contrast with Hector), even when he knows that that fate is going to be death (from Book 18).
In Book 18, Thetis positively foretells Achilles’ death only on the condition that he carries out his plan of fighting to kill Hector.
relationship between gods and fate
The invincibility of Fate can make the gods appear the lesser power. But a key episode – Zeus and Hera in Book 16 – shows otherwise.
Zeus wants to spare his son, Sarpedon, from his fate. Hera’s reply suggests that Z really could do this, only that he shouldn’t: if he does, it will cause chaos among the gods, because they will all want to save their sons from their fates. Z gives way to this logic.
Thus, Homer neatly suggests that the gods are superior to fate, yet abide by its wishes, using fate essentially as a rule-book by which the gods must operate to preserve peace in their own community
roles of the gods, enforcing fate
Despite their theoretical superiority to fate (see previous slide), in practice the gods enforce the will of fate. Good examples include:
Z’s decision not to save Sarpedon (Book 16);
The scales scene of Book 22, when the gods abide by fate’s decision on Hector’s death without debate.
YET it would be a big mistake to argue that the gods are merely enforcers of fate. That would be to deny their independent wills (obvious: just look at their arguments in Books 1, 4, 16, 24).
In fact, the gods simply choose to enact fate (Zeus, Book 16) for the good of the divine community. They are not just fate’s servants
the roles of the gods, driving the plot
The gods are behind many of the key elements in the plot:
Achilles’ anger (Apollo) and the effectiveness of his revenge on Agamemnon (Thetis/Zeus).
The restarting of the war (Book 4, Zeus, Athene, Hera).
Achilles’ Book 9 decision (if we accept Delusion as a goddess).
The death of Patroclus (Book 16 – Apollo).
Achilles’ ability to return to the war (Book 18 – armour, Thetis/Hephaestus).
The death of Hector (Book 22 – Zeus, Athene).
The reconciliation between Priam and Achilles (Book 24).
Does all this make the gods of equal or even greater importance to the story than the human characters?
roles of the gods, artistic effect
GRIFFIN (1980): gods add significance to the human action, both glorifying it (the action is worthy of a divine audience) but also humbling it (the limits of mortality are shown up through contrast).
They provide a foil for mortal life and woes. This is clearest in Book 1 (divine reconciliation vs human quarrel). Effect? The tragedy of the human quarrel, but also tragedy of human weakness more generally.
Rounding off the plot: note that both human and divine quarrels are resolved in the same act of reconciliation in Book 24.
Variety. The gods give us a change of scene and character cast.
One could argue that the gods are comic (see final slide) – if so, then one of their functions is to vary the mood, adding interest.
problems with the gods
Finding fault with the indignity of Homer’s gods is very common in the history of Homeric scholarship. It went back to the ancient world:
THEAGENES OF RHEGIUM (C6thBC): allegorised divine brawling in Bks 21/22.
HERACLITUS (C1stAD, not the philosopher): also used allegory to explain that Homer was not being ‘irreverent towards the gods’ – a ‘serious charge’.
Those not tempted to allegorise Homer’s gods to let the poet off the hook used their indignity as a proof of Homer’s inadequacy:
SCALIGER (C16th) – thought Hephaestus sweating over his forge undignified.
Another criticism (TERRASSON, C17th): gods are overused, even disrupting human action (e.g., Athene helping Achilles, Bk 22).