Theme 3.4: Market Structures Flashcards

1
Q

What are the four key characteristics of a market structure?

A
  1. Number of firms
  2. Product differentiation
  3. Barriers to entry
  4. Information
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Give the four assumptions and implications of a firm in a perfect competition market structure

A
  1. Many insignificant firms: firms cannot influence industry supply, low concentration ratio, act independently
  2. Homogeneous goods: firms cannot differentiate their goods, and all are very strong substitutes, so the firms are price takers
  3. No barriers to entry or exit: firms can easily join or leave the industry, so if abnormal profits are being made, new entrants will join, so only normal profits will be earned in the long run
  4. Perfect Information: Little to no patenting or copyrighting, no trade secrets
    (5. SR profit maximisation: Firms operate at MR = MC)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Give three examples of monopolistic competition

A
  • Sandwich bars
  • Takeaway restaurants
  • Hairdressers
  • Children’s nurseries
  • Care homes
  • Hotels
  • Coach companies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Give the four assumptions and implications of a firm in a monopolistic competition market structure

A
  1. Many insignificant firms: firms cannot influence industry supply, low concentration ratio, act independently
  2. Differentiated goods: firms have some degree of price setting ability, but there are relatively strong substitutes, so demand will be relativel elastic, but there will be some brand loyalty
  3. Low barriers to entry or exit: firms can easily join or leave the industry, so if abnormal profits are being made, new entrants will join, so only normal profits will be earned in the long run
  4. Imperfect Information: Buyers and sellers do not have complete market information
    (5. SR profit maximisation: Firms operate at MR = MC)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the order that curves should be drawn in in a LR monopolistic competition diagram?

A

AC
MC
AR at a tangent to AC
P1Q1 equilibrim at AR/AC intersection
MR passing through MC at equilibrium point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Give the four assumptions and implications of a firm in an oligopoly market structure

A
  1. A few dominant firms: high concentration ratio, limited consumer choice
  2. Differentiated goods: firms have price setting power, and they are able to compete on non-price factors as well as price
  3. High barriers to entry or exit: new firms find it difficult to enter the industry, so supernormal profits can be earned in the long run
  4. Firms are interdependent: actions of one firm affect the others in the industry, so firms act strategically, reacting to rival firm decision and anticipating their future actions (if one firm gains market share, it is at the exapense of other firms)
    (5. SR profit maximisation: Firms operate at MR = MC)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does the kinked demand curve implicate about pricing in oligopolies?

A

The interdependent nature of oligopolies: elasticity of demand faced is different depending on whether a firm raises or lowers its price (this is partially due to the possible reactions of other firms)
Price rigidity: changes to the marginal cost do not lead to a change in the equilibrium price (unless the change in MC is very high), and the different elasticities mean there is little incentive to depart from the ‘status quo’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe predatory pricing

A

Pricing at a level below the firm’s own cost with the aim of forcing a competitor out of business
Potential of success depends on having greater ability to withstand SR losses than the competitor (more funds)
Success = potential for greater profits in the long run due to less competition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Evaluate predatory pricing

A

It is illegal in the UK, so firms might be put off from conducting this strategy (though it’s difficult for regulators to prove)
Depends on the relative risk/reward of the policy - if the chance of being caught is high, and the punishment is high, the business will be less likely to conduct predatory pricing
Firms will incur losses - requires substantial cash reserves or access to credit to be a viable strategy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe limit pricing

A

Similar to predatory pricing, but designed to prevent firms from entering a market
Firms set their price below the AC of potential competitors
Possible to still make profit if incumbent benefits from high EoS
Success = no obvious end to this pricing policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evaluate limit pricing

A

Firms must forgo significant profits in the short run to pusue this
Firms may not have clear information on the entrants’ ACs, so struggle to determine the necessary price to be effective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe price leadership

A

A situation where prices and price changes established by a dominant firm are accepted by others and which other firms in the industry adopt and follow
Can be a form of tacit collusion if all industry prices tend towards a higher price
e.g. price matching by supermarkets could be seen as tacit collusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evaluate price leadership

A

Regulators might intervene if the pricing actions of firms in an industry are against the consumer interest
However, tacit collusion is very difficult to prove

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe the conditions for price wars to break out

A

Tends to occur in industries were non-price competition is weak
Could be a result of price based competition or predatory pricing
More likely in industries where goods are weakly branded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Evaluate price wars

A

Firms generally attempt to avoid price wars due to the impact on revenue
Kinked demand cure suggests price rigidity as firms lack the incentive to change their price, so firms might be more likely to engage in non-price competition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

List the possible forms of non-price competition

A
  • Marketing
  • Innovation
  • Loyalty cards
  • After sales surveys
  • Opening hours
  • Delivery
  • Customer service
  • Contractual arrangements
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain marketing non-price competition

A

Advertising, branding and wider marketing
Successful marketing increases demand (shifts AR & MR right)
Strong brands make product more price inelastic
Is it a zero-sum gain? Will marketing efforts of competitors cancel out any advantage?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain quality non-price competition

A

Innovation: creating new and improved products
Innovation + patenting may reinforce market power
Longer term strategy (requires patience)
First mover advantage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Explain mergers and acquisitions non-price competition

A

Horizontal mergers with other firms in the industry can effectively increase market power
Can be a useful way to counter a dominant firm in the industry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Explain customer loyalty non-price competition

A

Good customer service increases demand (shifts AR & MR right)
Opening hours
Customer experience, such as John Lewis / Waitrose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Give the general evaluation points for non-price competition

A

Firms may use a combination of strategies at any one point in time
Strategies may change over time
Firm’s strategies may not be clear to the outside world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Describe collusion

A

Any form of agreement between firms to avoid competition with each other
Firms have the incentive to collude as it helps them to maximise profit
Firms act like one decision maker (like a monopoly)
Collusion can be overt or tacit: overt, anti-competitive collusion is illegal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Describe overt collusion

A

Overt: spoken, open or traceable
Collusion is often explained by a desire to achieve joint-profit maximisation within a market or prevent price and revenue instability in an industry
Price fixing represents an attempt by suppliers to control supply and fix prices close to a monopoly’s desired price

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Describe tacit collusion

A

Unspoken actions between oligopolistic firms that are likely to minimise a competitive response. For example, to firms may decide to avoid price cutting or not attacking each other’s market share

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Describe cartels

A

Agreements between 2 or more firms not to compete with each other
Can be an agreement to fix prices or to reduce production levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Give a real world example of a cartel

A

OPEC: 14 oil producing nations, each has an oil production quota which they agree not to exceed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What conditions are cartels more likely to form under

A

The smaller number of firms, the more likely an agreement can be made and held to
More likely in stable, mature industries than rapidly evolving industries
High barriers to entry: resulting supernormal profit will attract new entrants, so high barriers to entry restrict their ability to join the market
Where there is a higher level of trust between colluding firms in general

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

How does a game theory payoff matrix show how collusion works?

A
  1. Without collusion, the firms would set a low price
  2. Firms have an incentive to collude and raise prices to maximise their revenue
  3. Collusion is likely to produce an unstable equilibrium, where firms have an incentive to ‘cheat’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Evaluate cartels and collusion

A

Producers may have an incentive to ‘cheat’ the agreement and produce more or lower their prices
Effective regulation may lead to exposure or illegal price-fixing
Indemnity guarantees by regulators may encourage exposure of price-fixing by whistle-blowing firms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Give the four assumptions and implications of a firm in an oligopoly market structure

A
  1. One (dominant) firm: The level of industry supply is determined solely by the monopoly firm, the firm is a price setter
  2. High barriers to entry: difficult for new firms to join, so supernormal profits can be achieved in the long run
  3. Differentiated products: the firm is a price setter, alternative products are weak substitutes
  4. Imperfect information: new firms may lack know-how to compete effectively (also barrier to entry), greater potential for the firm to price discriminate
    (5. SR profit maximisation: Firms operate at MR = MC)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Difference between monopoly and monopoly power

A

Monopoly is a precise market structure
Monopoly power describes factors that enable firms to be price setters (this can also happen in more competitive markets, like an oligopoly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Give the two sources of monopoly power

A
  1. Barriers to entry
  2. Product differentiation and near competitors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Explain how barriers to entry are a source of monopoly power

A

Legal barriers: patents, licensing
Sunk costs: industry-specific capital inputs with little to no resale value
Anti-competitive practices: e.g. limit pricing
Marketing barriers: cars, cosmetics, existing branding can make it difficult for firms to create their own recognisable brand
Scale economies: new entrants may struggle to compete with a firm benefitting from EoS
International trade restrictions: tariffs / quotas may create national monopolies
Greater barriers to entry = stronger monopoly power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Explain how product differentiation is a source of monopoly power

A

Products that are clearly differentiated from rivals means consumers may rely more heavily on it
Electricity: batteries, gas, oil are poor substitutes
Southampton-London train route is local / regional monopoly power

33
Q

Describe a natural monopoly

A

Where industry EoS are so large that one producer will always achieve lower costs than a situation with two or more firms. If there were multiple firms, the average costs of each smaller firm would be higher than the natural monopoly’s: more likely in an industry with significant fixed costs and low marginal costs
It is more efficient for a natural monopoly industry to operate with one firm rather than several, as several would lead to a waste of resources

34
Q

Give two examples of real world natural monopolies

A

Gas, electricity or water have huge costs of building and maintaining nationwide networks of cables and pipes
Channel tunnel: no point in having a second tunnel

35
Q

Give the evaluation of natural monopolies

A

‘Competition’ has been created in utility industries through government regulation
An industry that is a natural monopoly may become competitive over time, if the market structure changes
Natural monopolies still face competition, e.g. the channel tunnel faces competition from ferries and flights

36
Q

How does a natural monopoly diagram differ from a typical cost and revenue diagram?

A

The MC / AC intersection is to the right of the MR / AR curve

37
Q

Advantages of monopolies for the firm itself

A

Economies of scale: Lower costs due to their scale, lower costs = higher profits
Pricing power: strong pricing power and lack of substitutes means that monopolies are likely to command large profit margins
Fewer competitors: lack of competition means that monopolies do not have as significant competitive pressures (less need to advertise or innovate)

38
Q

Disadvantages of monopolies for the firm itself

A

Regulatory scrutiny: monopolies can be investigated by regulators if they are unfairly exploiting consumers (CMA investigating in the UK)
Threats from outside of the industry: if monopolies fail to innovate over time, they may lose out to more dynamic firms in other industries

39
Q

Advantages of monopolies for consumers

A

Economies of scale: lower costs may be passed onto consumers as lower prices, especially in natural monopoly industries
Innovation from supernormal profit: reinvested profit could lead to dynamic efficiency
Stability for consumers and businesses: monopolists can plan for long term industry development

40
Q

Disadvantages of monopolies for consumers

A

Higher prices and lower output: consumers may pay higher prices than a competitive equilibrium, so some consumers are ‘priced out’
Lack of incentive to be efficient: allocatively inefficient, pricing above marginal cost, X-inefficient, operating above its AC curve, dynamically inefficient, lack of competitive incentive to innovate

41
Q

Advantages of monopolies for employees

A

Better rates of pay than smaller firms
Better for job security
Career progression opportunities

42
Q

Disadvantages of monopolies for employees

A

Workers may lack alternative employers in the industry, so they have a weak bargaining power against the monopoly firm
Jobs may not be secure if large firms can replace a worker with machinery

43
Q

Advantages of monopolies for suppliers

A

Supplier might enjoy regular orders which could be a significant part of their revenue, which is more stable than many small orders
Supplying to a major firm may provide a good image for the business

44
Q

Disadvantages of monopolies for suppliers

A

Suppliers have a weak bargaining position, and are forced to accept lower prices over time
Could become over dependent on the demand from a monopoly firm

45
Q

Problems with the monopoly ‘model’

A

Monopolies are not always bad: may be desirable in some cases but may need strong regulation
Monopolies do not have to be big: many examples of local monopolies
Some industries are ‘natural’ monopolies, which are more efficient to have one firm than many firms

46
Q

Define price discrimination

A

Charging different groups of consumers different prices for the same good or service

47
Q

Give the conditions for price discrimination

A

Price-setting power in at least one market
Different price elasticities of demand of at least two consumer groups
Have information about consumer preferences: the firm should be able to identify consumers in each group, and set different prices for the different groups
Low or no market arbitrage or market seepage: the firm must prevent consumers in one group selling to consumers in the other

48
Q

What are the different degrees of price discrimination?

A

(1st degree price discrimination:
Perfect segmentation with every customer charged their “willingness to pay”)

(2nd degree price discrimination:
Differing quantities)

** 3rd degree price discrimination: **
Market segmentation due to different elasticities of demand

49
Q

Describe third degree market separation

A

Firms seek to segment the market into two or more groups
Firms maximise profits in each sub-market using their differing elasticities of demand: lower price for groups with elastic demand and higher price for groups with inelastic demand
Requires inability to resell good (or prevention of doing so)

50
Q

Give some real world examples of 3rd degree market separation

A

Discounts to senior citizens
Student discounts
Gender pricing in bars / nightclubs
Price of petrol in the city vs motorways

51
Q

Give the advantages of price discrimination

A

Some consumers are ‘priced in’, who might not have otherwise been able to afford the product, e.g. cheaper anti-viral drugs for developing countries
Higher output than under a single price
Profits may finance research and development projects
Profits may help to cross-subsidise other activities

52
Q

Give the disadvantages of price discrimination

A

Some customers pay higher prices than under normal market equilibrium
Fairness issues
No guarantee that increased profits earned will actually lead to investment and innovation
Producers could lose revenue/profit if their information about consumers is imperfect

53
Q

What is a contestable market?

A

A market with low barriers to entry / exit

54
Q

What are the three main categories of barriers to entry?

A
  1. Illegal anti-competitive practices (limit / predatory pricing)
  2. The nature of the industry (capital costs, sunk costs, EoS)
  3. Those imposed by authorities (legal barriers: patenting, licensing)
55
Q

What is the main assumption of contestable markets?

A

Inability for firms to make abnormal profits in the long run

56
Q

Where do firms in contestable markets normally choose to operate? Why?

A

AR = AC
To avoid losing market share or to avoid hit-and-run tactics

57
Q

What are the three main ways contestability may ‘organically’ occur in a market?

A
  1. Entrepreneurial zeal
  2. Advances in technology
  3. Economic cycle
58
Q

How does entrepreneurial zeal lead to greater market contestability?

A

Entrepreneurs are risk-takers that are looking for ways of profiting by breaking existing market structures
e.g. Metro bank challenging dominance of major UK banks

59
Q

How do advances in technology lead to greater contestability?

A

Internet: new entry point in many markets, reduces costs of joining an industry (less need for chain shops), improved information for consumers and firms about their suppliers and components
Advances may reduce the minimum efficient scale of production

60
Q

How does the economic cycle lead to greater contestability?

A

A recession can open up markets to new businesses
e.g. The recession of 2008/09 led to an increase in market share for discount food retailers like Aldi and Lidl – taking away market share from dominant food retailers

61
Q

What are four policies that can be used to improve the contestability of a market?

A
  1. Privatisation and deregulation
  2. Regulation
  3. Improving access to selling platforms
  4. European integration
62
Q

How does privatisation and deregulation lead to greater contestability?

A

Privatisation creates a profit motive for a company, which encourages greater efficiency
When privatisation occurs alongside deregulation, it can open up the market to competition, e.g. rail and utility companies in 1980’s

63
Q

How does regulation lead to greater contestability?

A

Firms can be forced to allow others to use their network
Without this, the market might become a ‘natural monopoly’
e.g. telecomms, gas, electricity

64
Q

How does improved access to selling platforms lead to greater contestability?

A

E.g. Access to flight routes for air travel operators, may require regulation if the market does not provide competition
Government could remove statutory licensing that prevents other firms from competing or force private companies to offer routes to more suppliers

65
Q

How does European integration lead to greater contestability?

A

Membership of the EU includes being part of a free trade area
No trade barriers between EU economies increases size of markets – greater number of suppliers that can compete in any one market, and allows EoS to be fully exploited

66
Q

What are the two broad types of efficiency?

A

** Static efficiency: the efficiency of an industry at one point in time
** Dynamic efficiency
: the efficiency of an industry over a period of time

67
Q

Describe allocative efficiency

A

How efficiently resources are allocated
Achieved when P = MC / AR = MC
The value consumers place on a good or service equals the cost of the resources used up in production
A type of static efficiency

68
Q

Describe productive efficiency

A

Is the product being produced as cheaply as possible?
AC at its lowest / AC = MC
A type of static efficiency

69
Q

Describe dynamic efficiency

A

When resources are used more efficiently over time: lower costs / better products
Two main requirements:
1. Means: supernormal profits for R&D
2. Incentive: the element of competition to incentivise the improvement of products

70
Q

Describe X-inefficiency

A

When a firm is not producing at the lowest possible cost for a given level of output
Managerial inefficiencies: bloated administrative costs
Other factors raising costs, such as trade unions raising workers’ wages above the market rate / environmental regulation causing costs to increase

71
Q

Determine the efficiency of firms in a LR perfect competition market

A

Allocatively efficient: MR = MC, P = MC, AR = MC
Productively efficient: operating at lowest point on AC curve
Dynamically inefficient: Normal profits in LR means there are no funds for innovation, homogeneous goods means there is no incentive to innovate
X-efficient: X-inefficient firms will have to lower their costs or leave

72
Q

Determine the efficiency of firms in a LR monopolistic competition market

A

Allocatively inefficient: MR = MC, P > MC
Productively inefficient: not operating at lowest point on AC curve
Dynamically inefficient: Normal profits in LR means there are no funds for innovation, competitive incentive to innovate
X-efficient: X-inefficient firms will have to lower their costs or leave

73
Q

Determine the efficiency of firms in a LR oligopolistic market

A

Allocatively inefficient: MR = MC, P > MC
Productively inefficient: not operating at lowest point on AC curve
Dynamically efficient: supernormal profits are possible in the LR, competitive incentive to innovate (unless colluding)
X-efficient?: supernormal profits means that X-inefficiencies are possible, but competition means that firms need to keep their costs low

74
Q

Determine the efficiency of firms in a LR monopoly market

A

Allocatively inefficient: MR = MC, P > MC
Productively inefficient: not operating at lowest point on AC curve
Dynamically efficient?: supernormal profits are possible in the LR, lack of competitive incentive to innovate
X-efficient?: supernormal profits means that X-inefficiencies are possible, lack of competition means firms can get away with poor control of costs and stay in business

75
Q

Which industries are likely to achieve static efficiency?

A

Perfectly competitive industries: this is good for consumers via prices that are at or close to the cost of production
Monopoly industries are unlikely to achieve static efficiency: consumers are likely to pay prices in excess to the cost of production

76
Q

Which industries are likely to achieve dynamic efficiency?

A

Oligopolies and monopolies: they tend to make abnormal profits, and have a greater potential to invest and therefore achieve dynamic efficiency
But, monopoly firms lack competition, so may lack the incentive to invest their profits
As perfectly competitive firms cannot earn abnormal profits in the long run, they don’t make the same dynamic gains that monopoly and oligopoly industries have the potential to

77
Q

Why is efficiency a trade off?

A

Unlikely that both dynamic and static efficiency can be achieved simultaneously
Achieving static efficiency requires making an industry more competitive through the reduction or removal of barriers to entry, which would reduce firms long run ability to make abnormal profits, so would compromise their investment capabilities

78
Q

Describe a monopsony

A

There is only one buyer in the market (more loosely: one dominant buyer)
Sellers do not have viable alternative buyers
The buyer profit maximises, so aims to minimise their costs by paying the suppliers the lowest possible prices
The firm has buying power, meaning they can negotiate lower prices

79
Q

Give real world examples of monoposony markets

A

NHS: accounts for >90% of healthcare equipment purchased in the UK
Tesco and other supermarkets are able to drive down the price paid to dairy farmers for milk
British sugar buys almost the entire sugar beet crop in the UK each year
Amazon’s buying power in the retail book market: gets a better price than other booksellers, which gives it a significant competitive advantage

80
Q

Advantages of monopsonies

A

Lower buying costs = lower prices, greater value for money for consumers
Lower costs = greater profits which could lead to greater innovation (dynamic efficiency)
Could counter-weight a dominant seller

81
Q

Disadvantages of monopsonies

A

Suppliers could be squeezes out of business, which could create a problem for the future supply
Monopsony’s supply relations could act as a barrier to entry for new entrants who cannot easily access suppliers of materials
Competitive gains to a monopsonist from lower supplier prices may reinforce a monopoly position in their dupply to customers further down the production chain