Theme 3.4: Market Structures Flashcards
What are the four key characteristics of a market structure?
- Number of firms
- Product differentiation
- Barriers to entry
- Information
Give the four assumptions and implications of a firm in a perfect competition market structure
- Many insignificant firms: firms cannot influence industry supply, low concentration ratio, act independently
- Homogeneous goods: firms cannot differentiate their goods, and all are very strong substitutes, so the firms are price takers
- No barriers to entry or exit: firms can easily join or leave the industry, so if abnormal profits are being made, new entrants will join, so only normal profits will be earned in the long run
- Perfect Information: Little to no patenting or copyrighting, no trade secrets
(5. SR profit maximisation: Firms operate at MR = MC)
Give three examples of monopolistic competition
- Sandwich bars
- Takeaway restaurants
- Hairdressers
- Children’s nurseries
- Care homes
- Hotels
- Coach companies
Give the four assumptions and implications of a firm in a monopolistic competition market structure
- Many insignificant firms: firms cannot influence industry supply, low concentration ratio, act independently
- Differentiated goods: firms have some degree of price setting ability, but there are relatively strong substitutes, so demand will be relativel elastic, but there will be some brand loyalty
- Low barriers to entry or exit: firms can easily join or leave the industry, so if abnormal profits are being made, new entrants will join, so only normal profits will be earned in the long run
- Imperfect Information: Buyers and sellers do not have complete market information
(5. SR profit maximisation: Firms operate at MR = MC)
What is the order that curves should be drawn in in a LR monopolistic competition diagram?
AC
MC
AR at a tangent to AC
P1Q1 equilibrim at AR/AC intersection
MR passing through MC at equilibrium point
Give the four assumptions and implications of a firm in an oligopoly market structure
- A few dominant firms: high concentration ratio, limited consumer choice
- Differentiated goods: firms have price setting power, and they are able to compete on non-price factors as well as price
- High barriers to entry or exit: new firms find it difficult to enter the industry, so supernormal profits can be earned in the long run
- Firms are interdependent: actions of one firm affect the others in the industry, so firms act strategically, reacting to rival firm decision and anticipating their future actions (if one firm gains market share, it is at the exapense of other firms)
(5. SR profit maximisation: Firms operate at MR = MC)
What does the kinked demand curve implicate about pricing in oligopolies?
The interdependent nature of oligopolies: elasticity of demand faced is different depending on whether a firm raises or lowers its price (this is partially due to the possible reactions of other firms)
Price rigidity: changes to the marginal cost do not lead to a change in the equilibrium price (unless the change in MC is very high), and the different elasticities mean there is little incentive to depart from the ‘status quo’
Describe predatory pricing
Pricing at a level below the firm’s own cost with the aim of forcing a competitor out of business
Potential of success depends on having greater ability to withstand SR losses than the competitor (more funds)
Success = potential for greater profits in the long run due to less competition
Evaluate predatory pricing
It is illegal in the UK, so firms might be put off from conducting this strategy (though it’s difficult for regulators to prove)
Depends on the relative risk/reward of the policy - if the chance of being caught is high, and the punishment is high, the business will be less likely to conduct predatory pricing
Firms will incur losses - requires substantial cash reserves or access to credit to be a viable strategy
Describe limit pricing
Similar to predatory pricing, but designed to prevent firms from entering a market
Firms set their price below the AC of potential competitors
Possible to still make profit if incumbent benefits from high EoS
Success = no obvious end to this pricing policy
Evaluate limit pricing
Firms must forgo significant profits in the short run to pusue this
Firms may not have clear information on the entrants’ ACs, so struggle to determine the necessary price to be effective
Describe price leadership
A situation where prices and price changes established by a dominant firm are accepted by others and which other firms in the industry adopt and follow
Can be a form of tacit collusion if all industry prices tend towards a higher price
e.g. price matching by supermarkets could be seen as tacit collusion
Evaluate price leadership
Regulators might intervene if the pricing actions of firms in an industry are against the consumer interest
However, tacit collusion is very difficult to prove
Describe the conditions for price wars to break out
Tends to occur in industries were non-price competition is weak
Could be a result of price based competition or predatory pricing
More likely in industries where goods are weakly branded
Evaluate price wars
Firms generally attempt to avoid price wars due to the impact on revenue
Kinked demand cure suggests price rigidity as firms lack the incentive to change their price, so firms might be more likely to engage in non-price competition
List the possible forms of non-price competition
- Marketing
- Innovation
- Loyalty cards
- After sales surveys
- Opening hours
- Delivery
- Customer service
- Contractual arrangements
Explain marketing non-price competition
Advertising, branding and wider marketing
Successful marketing increases demand (shifts AR & MR right)
Strong brands make product more price inelastic
Is it a zero-sum gain? Will marketing efforts of competitors cancel out any advantage?
Explain quality non-price competition
Innovation: creating new and improved products
Innovation + patenting may reinforce market power
Longer term strategy (requires patience)
First mover advantage
Explain mergers and acquisitions non-price competition
Horizontal mergers with other firms in the industry can effectively increase market power
Can be a useful way to counter a dominant firm in the industry
Explain customer loyalty non-price competition
Good customer service increases demand (shifts AR & MR right)
Opening hours
Customer experience, such as John Lewis / Waitrose
Give the general evaluation points for non-price competition
Firms may use a combination of strategies at any one point in time
Strategies may change over time
Firm’s strategies may not be clear to the outside world
Describe collusion
Any form of agreement between firms to avoid competition with each other
Firms have the incentive to collude as it helps them to maximise profit
Firms act like one decision maker (like a monopoly)
Collusion can be overt or tacit: overt, anti-competitive collusion is illegal
Describe overt collusion
Overt: spoken, open or traceable
Collusion is often explained by a desire to achieve joint-profit maximisation within a market or prevent price and revenue instability in an industry
Price fixing represents an attempt by suppliers to control supply and fix prices close to a monopoly’s desired price
Describe tacit collusion
Unspoken actions between oligopolistic firms that are likely to minimise a competitive response. For example, to firms may decide to avoid price cutting or not attacking each other’s market share
Describe cartels
Agreements between 2 or more firms not to compete with each other
Can be an agreement to fix prices or to reduce production levels
Give a real world example of a cartel
OPEC: 14 oil producing nations, each has an oil production quota which they agree not to exceed
What conditions are cartels more likely to form under
The smaller number of firms, the more likely an agreement can be made and held to
More likely in stable, mature industries than rapidly evolving industries
High barriers to entry: resulting supernormal profit will attract new entrants, so high barriers to entry restrict their ability to join the market
Where there is a higher level of trust between colluding firms in general
How does a game theory payoff matrix show how collusion works?
- Without collusion, the firms would set a low price
- Firms have an incentive to collude and raise prices to maximise their revenue
- Collusion is likely to produce an unstable equilibrium, where firms have an incentive to ‘cheat’
Evaluate cartels and collusion
Producers may have an incentive to ‘cheat’ the agreement and produce more or lower their prices
Effective regulation may lead to exposure or illegal price-fixing
Indemnity guarantees by regulators may encourage exposure of price-fixing by whistle-blowing firms
Give the four assumptions and implications of a firm in an oligopoly market structure
- One (dominant) firm: The level of industry supply is determined solely by the monopoly firm, the firm is a price setter
- High barriers to entry: difficult for new firms to join, so supernormal profits can be achieved in the long run
- Differentiated products: the firm is a price setter, alternative products are weak substitutes
- Imperfect information: new firms may lack know-how to compete effectively (also barrier to entry), greater potential for the firm to price discriminate
(5. SR profit maximisation: Firms operate at MR = MC)
Difference between monopoly and monopoly power
Monopoly is a precise market structure
Monopoly power describes factors that enable firms to be price setters (this can also happen in more competitive markets, like an oligopoly
Give the two sources of monopoly power
- Barriers to entry
- Product differentiation and near competitors
Explain how barriers to entry are a source of monopoly power
Legal barriers: patents, licensing
Sunk costs: industry-specific capital inputs with little to no resale value
Anti-competitive practices: e.g. limit pricing
Marketing barriers: cars, cosmetics, existing branding can make it difficult for firms to create their own recognisable brand
Scale economies: new entrants may struggle to compete with a firm benefitting from EoS
International trade restrictions: tariffs / quotas may create national monopolies
Greater barriers to entry = stronger monopoly power