Theme 1E: Early Church- Kerygmata ('preaching'/'message') Flashcards
Describe the concept of Kerygma in the context of early Christian preaching.
Kerygma is the greek word for ‘preaching’ or ‘proclamation’ , referring to an annoucement rather than just a set of teachings. It is central to the early church’s mesage about Jesus, as seen in the Apostles’ preaching in Acts
Explain Hermann Reimarus’s perspective on the disciples’ portrayal of Jesus.
Hermann Reimarus was a skeptical theologian who argued that the disciples altered Jesus’s views, particularly by removing his apocalyptic beliefs about the end of the world, to focus on a timeless spiritual truth after the world did not end.
How did Reimarus believe the disciples responded to the failure of Jesus’s apocalyptic predictions?
Reimarus believed the disciples faked the resurrection and shifted the focus of Jesus’s message to avoid returning to their previous lives as fisherman, thus starting a new religion.
Do the letters of Paul align with the early churh’s preaching as described in the book of Acts?
The consistency or conflict between Paul’s letters and the early church’s preaching is a key area of debate, particularly regarding the core ideas presented in both.
What role does the Kerygma play in understanding the early church’s message about Jesus?
The Kerygma is crucial for understanding how the early church proclaimed the events of Jesus’s life and ministry, emphasising the announcements of significant events rather than merely teaching doctrines.
How did the disciples present their message about Jesus according to the concept of Kerygma?
The disciple presented their message not as a lecture but as a ‘heralding’ of an event, focusing on the proclamation of Jesus’s significance and actions.
What is the significance of the Kerygma in the New Testament?
The Kerygma is significant in the New Testament as it encapsulates the core message of the apostles, highlighting the importance of proclaiming the events of Jesus’s life and the implications for believers.
Describe the distinction C.H. Dodd makes between Kerygma and teaching or historical fact.
C.H Dodd emphasises that Kerygma should not be confused with teaching or historical fact, although it can encompass these elements. He views the New Testament as a bold set of claims that challenges readers to make a decision.
Explain the significance of the speeches in the book of Acts according to C.H. Dodd.
According to C.H. Dodd, the speeches in Acts are significant as they focus on experiencing a joyful transformation in our lives, highlighting the impact of the Christian message.
How does the book of Acts illustrate the spread of Christian message?
The book of Acts illustrates the progression of the Christian message from Jerusalem, through the Roman Empire, and ultimately to Rome itself.
Define the central theme of the speeches in Acts 2 and 3.
The central theme of the speeches in Acts 2 and 3 is that God’s plan for salvation, as foretold in Jewish scriptures, has been fulfilled through the life, death and resurrection of Jesus, and continues through the power of the Holy Spirit.
Do the speeches in Acts suggest a transformation for the audience?
Yes, the speeches in Acts suggest that the audience can experience a joyful transformation in their lives as a result of the Christian message.
Explain the role of the Holy Spirit in the fulfillment of God’s plan as presented in Acts.
The Holy Spirit plays a crucial role in the continuation of God’s plan for salvation, as indicated in the speeches of Acts, following the fulfillment of this plan through Jesus.
Evaluate the historical reliability of the book of Acts.
Some scholars consider Acts a literary product rather than a historical account, suggesting that the speeches attributed to figures like Peter, Stephen, and Paul are summaries reflecting the author’s perspective.
Identify the author of Luke-Acts and his background.
Luke, the author of Luke-Acts, is a Gentile and not a Jewish Christian, which means he was not present during the events he reports.
Discuss the timeline of the writing of Luke-Acts.
Luke-Acts was likely written about 40-50 years after the event it describes, around 80 CE.
Analyse the structure of the book of Acts.
Acts is highly organised, which may suggest that the material has been altered from its original form, featuring 11 speeches that share similar elements and serve as focal points in the narrative.
Compare the language style of Acts with Paul’s theology.
The language in Acts is more characterisitc of Luke-Acts than of Paul’s theology, with later speeches attributed to Paul sounding more like the voice of Luke.
Examine the themes present in Paul’s letters versus those in Acts.
Many significant themes from Paul’s letters, such as faith versus works and spiritual gifts in the Church, are notably absent in the accounts of his preaching in Acts.
Describe the nature of events reported in the book of Acts.
Acts includes reports of miraculous events and sudden dramatic shifts in perspectives, which align more with ancient literary styles than with modern historical accounts.
Counteragruments- Describe the purpose of Luke in writing the book of Acts.
Luke’s purpose in writing the book of Acts is to convey how the good news of Jesus spread through the work and message of the disciples.
Counterarguments- Explain the significance of the early church’s acceptance of the book of Acts.
The early church never seriously questioned the book of Acts as a key document, suggesting its historical value and reliability, as any misrepresentation of known events would likely have been challenged.
Counterarguments- Define the Muratorian Canon and its relation to the book of Acts.
The Muratorian Canon is an early list of Christian texts that affirms the book of Acts, indicating its acceptance and importance in early Christian literature.
Counterarguments- How do scholars view the historical value of the book of Acts?
Many scholars disagree with the assumption that there is no historical value in Acts, recognising its significance as a historical document.