Theft, Fraud &co Flashcards
R v Hinks
the receipt of a gift can be an appropriation
DPP v Gomez
an appropriation can occur even if property passes with the consent or authorisation of the owner
R v Ghosh
Mens rea of theft: (1) was the act dishonest according to the ordinary standards of reasonable and honest people (2) if yes, did the defendant realise that reasonable and honest people would regard what he did as dishonest?
DPP v Ray
(Chinese restaurant case) Held that the transaction had to be regarded as a whole in that the defendant’s conduct was a continuing representation of his present intention to pay
R v Dawson
whether force had been used or threatened is a matter for the jury in each case to determine
R v Clowden
there is no distinction between applying force to the person or to his property
R v Hale
force is used at the time of theft if the appropriation was still continuing when force was used
R v Ryan
defendant remained stuck inside a window. Held to amount to an entry
R v Boyle
permission to enter obtained by fraud is not true permission –> defendant will be a trespasser
R v Jones
entering a building with the intention of doing something contrary to a general permission to enter can amount to trespass
R v Collins
the mens rea for entry as a trespasser is that at the time of entry into the building the defendant must either know he was entering as a trespasser, or be reckless as to whether he was a trespasser or not
R v Walkington
defendant was convicted of burglary when he went around a three-sided counter in a shop to get to the till