Theft act 1968 Flashcards
What is the first section Within the Theft act of 1968
Theft.
Do you remember the definition?
A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it.
What are the 5 fingers that are required to prove a theft has occurred?
- Dishonestly
- Appropriates
- Property
- Belonging to another
- Intention to permanently deprive
Section 2 of the theft act covers the dishonesty test, what are the 3 defences for dishonesty, and can you name the relevant case law (for bonus points?
- Law – believes he had a right in law to deprive the other of it.
- Consent – believes the owner would have consented in the circumstances.
- Reasonable steps – took reasonable steps to find the owner.
the current case law is case Ivey v Genting Casinos (uk) [2017] or R v Gosh [1982] is the old standard.
Section 3 is about the term appropriate what does this mean in the legal sense, and for bones points can you name any case law regarding this section?
An appropriation of property is an assumption of the rights of the owner including where he comes by the property innocently and later deals with it as an owner. This appropriation will be regarded as Theft (R v Hinks 2000) (R v Morris, Anderton v Burnside (1984))
Section 4 relates to property, what can be considered property under this act?
Property includes – money, personal property, real estate, things in action and other intangibles
Land itself cannot be stolen, however soil or turf can be though. If you cultivate plants, trees or flowers – they can be stolen Case law Oxford v Moss 1979
Wild creatures, tamed or untamed, are property. They cannot be stolen unless – they are ordinarily kept in captivity, or they have been reduced into possession and possession has not been lost or abandoned
Under section 4 there are the 4 F’s that are not considered property, what are they and under what circumstance can they be considered property to steal?
Wildflowers, Fungi, Foliage and Fruit
they are not considered property unless they are picked for the sale or commercial gain of the person picking them.
Section 6 regards the intention to permanently deprive. what constitutes permanently depriving?
To permanently deprive means to – consume, sell, destroy, leaving it anywhere it can’t be found. Or period/circumstance and parting under a condition. [R v Lavender 1994]
Section 13 of the Theft act 1968 is the Abstracting Electricity, what is the definition?
“A person is guilty of the offence, if they dishonestly and without due authority use electricity or cause it to be wasted or diverted.”
Section 13 Was an addition to the theft act, why was a separate offence needed for this?
Electricity does not come under the definition of Property as set out within section 4, there for technically cannot be stolen. hence why this section was created.
Section 9 of the theft act covers burglary; do you remember the definition?
A person is guilty of burglary if—
(a)he enters any building or part of a building as a trespasser and with intent to - Steal anything within the building or part of the building, inflict GBH on anyone therein or do unlawful damage to the building or anything therein.
(b)having entered any building or part of a building as a trespasser he steals or attempts to steal anything in the building or that part of it or inflicts or attempts to inflict on any person therein any grievous bodily harm.
What is the necessity for the term building to be accepted?
Buildings must have some form of permanence to count,
therefor a tent would not count. A static caravan would count if being lived in, however would not count if it was not being lived in as it counts as a premises and not a building
With regard to 9(1)a Where does the intent have to be formed?
Intention must be formed before they enter the house
Irrelevant that the things the person intended to steal, or damage were not there, or that the victim of an intended GBH was not present
What is the difference between 9(1)a and 9(1)b for burglary?
9(1)a requires intent before entering a building or part of a building and includes unlawful damage and does not require the object of their intent be actually present.
9(1)b does not require intent and requires that the person actually steal or attempts to steal or inflicts GBH or attempts to inflict GBH on anyone therein. However, it does remove unlawful damage.
Section 10 of the Theft act covers Aggravated burglary. What acronym is used to convey the articles required to meet this section?
WIFE
Weapon of offence
Imitation firearm
Firearm
Explosive