Theft Flashcards
Defined in?
Section 1 of Theft Act 1968
Elements?
Appropriation - s3 Of property - s4 Belonging to another - s5 Dishonestly - s2 Intention to permanently deprive - s6
Actus reus?
Appropriation
Of property
Belonging to another
Appropriation:
Section 3(1) Theft Act 1968
Assuming the rights of the owner
E.g treating the property as if it’s yours
Appropriation cases:
R v Morris - changing price of item in shop
Lawrence v MPC - appropriation can take place with consent
R v Gomez - HL confirmed appropriation can occur with consent
R v Hinks - can be appropriation even if D was given property as a gift
Property:
Section 4 -includes money and all other property including things in action and intangible property (debts, copyright)
Section 4(2) cannot steal land unless D takes something from it like soil
Section 4(3) cannot steal mushrooms, fruit or wild flowers as long as they are not sold
Section 4(4) cannot steal wild animals unless they are tamed or kept in captivity
Property cases:
Oxford v Moss - confidential information is not property and therefore cannot be appropriated
R v Akbar - stealing actual exam paper itself would be appropriation
Belonging to another:
Section 5(1) - property regarded as belonging to any person having possession or control of it, or having any proprietary right or interest
Belonging to another cases:
R v dyke and Munro - d must be charged with theft of the property from the owner
D can steal his own property:
R v Turner - d took car back after repairs without paying
Obligation to use property in a particular way:
Section 5(3) Covers occasions where money is given to someone for a particular purpose
R v wain - d raised £3000 for a telethon but was guilty when he spent the money himself
Property acquired by mistake:
Section 5(4) - if a shop gives out too much change, under section 5(4) the excess change still belongs to them and if D keeps it then he can be guilty of theft
A-G Ref - D was overpaid wages by her employers. The CA said she was legally obliged to return the money
Mens rea of theft?
Dishonesty
Intention to permanently deprive
Dishonesty
D not dishonest if : Section 2(1)(a) - D takes something he thinks is his
Section 2(1)(b) - D borrows something he thinks the owner would let him
Section 2(1)(c) - D finds something that the person who owns it would not be discovered even if reasonable steps are taken
Belief does not have to be reasonable, just honest
Dishonesty cases
R v small - d not guilty when he took a car he thought was abandoned
Ghosh test?
2 stages
Was D’s conduct dishonest by the standards of reasonable, honest people?
If so..
Did d realise that his conduct was dishonest by those standards
If yes to both, d is dishonest