Theft Flashcards
Morris
There is no need to assume all the rights of the owner, just one
Lawrence/Gomez
Appropriation can occur even where the original owner consents
Hinks
Appropriation can occur even where the property is a gift
Oxford v Moss
information is not property for the purposes of theft
Kelly & Lindsay
corpses are not information for the purposes of theft
Lowe v Blease
electricity is not property for the purposes of theft
Turner
the defendant is capable of stealing his own property if another party has a proprietary interest in it
Wain/Davidge & Bunnett
property belongs to another if the defendant has an obligation to deal with it in a particular way
Hall
property does not belong to another if the defendant is not have an obligation to deal with it in a particular way
AG Ref No.1 1983
If the defendant obtains property by mistake, they have an obligation to restore it as it belongs to another
Holden
dishonesty cannot be proven where the defendant believed they had a legal right to the property
Small
dishonesty cannot be proven where the defendant believed that the original owner could not be found by taking reasonable steps
Ghosh
dishonesty test
Velumyl
intending to replace property with different property of the same value is still intent to permanently deprive
Easom
conditional intent is not enough for the MR of theft