Theft Flashcards

1
Q

What is the AR of theft?

A
  1. Appropriation
  2. Of property
  3. Belonging to another
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does “appropriation” mean?

A

Any assumption of the rights of an owner (Section 3(1) Theft Act 1968)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A defendant only needs to appropriate any single right of an owner. Which case?

A

R v Morris

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Consent to the appropriation is irrelevant. Which case?

A

R v Gomez

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A gift is still appropriation. Which case?

A

R v Hinks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Confidential information cannot be “property”. Which case?

A

Oxford v Moss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

It is possible to steal property you already own. Which case?

A

R v Turner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Lost property is not abandoned. Which case?

A

Hibbert v McKiernan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the MR of theft?

A
  1. Intention to permanently deprive

2. Dishonesty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Borrowing will only be an intention to permanently deprive if it is returned in such a state in which “all of its goodness and virtue is gone”. Which case?

A

LLoyd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the test for dishonesty?

A

Ghosh:

  1. Would the honest and reasonable person regard what D did as dishonest?
  2. Did D realise that the honest and reasonable person would regard what D did as dishonest?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Borrowing money always creates an intention to permanently deprive, unless the same coins and notes are returned. Which case?

A

R v Velumyl

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly