Theft Flashcards

1
Q

what is the max sentence for theft?

A

7 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

where is the crime of theft set out?

A

s.1(1) of the Theft Act 1968

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what does this act state?

A

A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How many elements are in this crime?

A

5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what elements are mentioned in the AR of theft?

A

Appropriates
Property
Belonging to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what elements are mentioned in the MR of theft?

A

Dishonestly
With the intention to permanently deprive the other of it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Where is the first element defined and what does it say?

A

Defined in s.3 as “any assumption by a person of the rights of an owner”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what does the does the act say about borrowing and where does it say it?

A

Borrowing something and then not giving it back can be appropriation – s.3(1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is said about consent and when does appropriation of consent occur?

A

Appropriation can occur even when the owner has consented to the D taking their property, provided the D has acted dishonestly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Lawrence v MPC (1972)

A

Italian offered taxi driver £1 for a 50p journey. Driver intimated that not enough, and took £6 when the Italian held out his wallet. THEFT!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Morris (1983

A

Shopper swaps the labels in the supermarket, so he could get the food through the checkout more cheaply. THEFT!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

DPP v Gomez (1993)

A

Shop assistant and customer conspired to trick shop manager into believing two cheques were valid, so he would let the customer leave with goods, only for the cheques to later bounce. THEFT!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hinks (1998)

A

Hinks befriended a man of limited intelligence and encouraged him to give her sums totalling £60,000 in gifts. By 3/2, HoL decided than an appropriation had occurred even though the D had given consented as the D had acted dishonestly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

where is the second element is defined and what does it say?

A

S4(1) states that property includes: “money and all other property, real or personal, including things in action and other intangible property”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Tangible

A

Things you can touch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Intangible

A

Rights which can be enforced by court action, e.g. song lyrics

17
Q

when can land be deemed as stolen and where is this stated?

A

s4 (2) A person cannot steal land, or things forming part of land and severed from it by him or by his directions, except in the following cases:

If you transfer ownership of the land when it not yours to do so
If you take something from the land like crops/soil
If a tenant in a student house removes fixtures

18
Q

when are plants deemed as stolen and what section is this stated in ? (give an example)

A

s4(3) : if a person takes something such as flowers or fruit that belongs to another bur doesn’t sell it isn’t classed as stolen
For example, you can pick wild berries from a farmer’s hedgerow but not if you plan to sell them.

19
Q

when can animals be deemed as stolen and where is this stated?

A

s4 (4) :
Taking a wild animal from the wild is not stealing, but taking any tamed or untamed animal when it is in someone else’s possession is

20
Q

Oxford v Moss (1979)

A

Defendant, an engineering student, took an exam paper with the intention of returning the paper having used the information gained in order to cheat in his exam. NOT THEFT!

21
Q

where is the third element is defined and what does it say? (give an example)

A

S5(1) states: “property shall be regarded as belonging to any person having possession or control of it, or having it in any proprietary right or interest”
For example if you let a friend borrow your purse for a party it belongs to both of you because she will be in possession of it.

22
Q

Taking something which is lost is theft but taking something which is abandoned is not. Give 2 cases that show theft had occurred.

A

Hibbert & McKiernan (1948) - taking golf balls from golf links was theft – they were lost, not abandoned.
Rickets (2010). Goods in bags outside a charity were taken. Was theft as Court said they were not abandoned as they were left for the charity shop

23
Q

Taking something which is lost is theft but taking something which is abandoned is not. Give an example that shows that theft hasn’t occurred.

A

Takin a magazine that has been left on a train is not theft, but taking from bins is (as it belongs to the council)

24
Q

where is dealing with other peoples property stated and give a case example?

A

S5(3) :
Davidge and Burnett (1984). D given money by flatmates to pay bills but spent it on Xmas presents. Guilty of theft as she had an obligation to deal with the money by paying the bills.

25
if you are given something by mistake what do you do? E.g. given too much change
you then have an obligation to give it back; not doing so is THEFT!
26
what is THEFT, as seen in AG’s Reference No 1 of 1983?
Given too much wage by an employer and keeping it
27
where is the fourth element defined and what does it say?
Dishonesty is actually not defined but does provide three specific situations where the person is not deemed dishonest if he appropriates the property
28
what are the three situations and where are they set out?
1) S2(1)(a) "in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it." (e.g. you think it’s been abandoned) 2) S2(1)(b) “in the belief that he would have the other’s consent” (e.g. He’s not in, but you use Tony’s sheers like always) 3) S2(1)(c) “in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps” (e.g. you find a £ on the street floor)
29
how are these tested?
subjectively
30
what is the case that uses one of the three to situations and which one does he use?
Small (1987). D takes a car which had been left for over a week with the key in the ignition. He successfully used s2(1)(a) as he believed he had a right in law and it did not matter whether the belief was reasonably held
31
Ivey and Genting (2017)
A gambler gained an advantage by memorising imperfections in the patterns on the backs of playing cards.
32
how is dishonesty established from Ivey and Genting? what are the 2 questions? (subjective or objective)
1. What were the facts as the D understood them to be? (SUBJECTIVE) 2. Given these facts, would they the D’s actions be considered dishonest by ordinary decent people? (OBJECTIVE)
33
where is the fifth element defined and what does it say?
s6(1) If someone takes something that belongs to someone else but doesn’t plan to keep it forever, it can still count as stealing if they act like the thing is theirs and ignore the real owner’s rights. Borrowing something can also count as stealing, but only if the borrowing is so long or in such a way that it’s almost the same as taking it permanently. 
34
what is stated in Fernandes (1996)?
The key phrase is “to treat the thing as his own to dispose of regardless of the other’s rights”
35
Chan Man-sin v AG for Hong Kong (1985).
Company drew money from company accounts knowing full well bank would have to reimburse company for lost money. Argued he had not permanently deprived them of it, but court said he was treating the thing as his own
36
Lloyd (1985)
Projectionist takes film reel to be copied but then returns it in time for next showing. Judge said not theft as for this there must be intention “to return the thing in such a changed state that can truly be said that all its goodness or virtue is gone.”