theft Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

definition of theft (with sections)

A

theft is defined in (s.1) as:
dishonestly (s.2)
appropriating (s.3)
property (s.4)
belonging to another (s.5)
with the intention to permenantly deprive the other of it. (s.6)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the AR of theft

A

appropriation of property belonging to another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what does appropriation mean?

A

appropriation is assuming the rights of the owner without consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v morris

A

switching price labels = appropriation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what section and act if theft set out in?

A

section 1 of the theft act 1868

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

name me 5 types of property

A

1- money
2 things In action
3 personal property
4 real
5 intangible property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

r v vinnal

A

assuming the rights of the owner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

r v pitham

A

only the owner has the right to sell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

consenting can still amount to appropriation in what 2 cases

A

Lawrence and Gomez

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

name me a case for personal property and what happened in it

A

r v kelly and Lindsay. a dead body was defined as personal property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

name me a case for intangible property and what happened in it

A

Oxford v moss. knowledge from memorising the test is not considered intangible property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is s4 (3)

A

states that wild plants and animals cannot be stolen unless for commercial reward

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is section 5 - belonging to another defined as

A

wide definition of possession or control of property or a proprietary interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

r v turner

A

guilty of stealing his own car

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what was the legal precedent set in ‘rickets’

A

if you leave goods for someone else they belong to the original owner until the new owner takes possession of them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what happened in r v Webster

A

was accidentally given 2 war medals, kept one and sold the other. he was guilty of theft as the medal supplier had a proprietary interest.

17
Q

what is s.5 (3)

A

property received under obligation.

18
Q

give me a case example of section 5 subsection 3 of the theft act 1868

A

davidge - was given money by flat mates for gas bills but he used it for Christmas gifts = guilty for theft

19
Q

what does section 5(5) of the theft act 1968 state

A

property received by mistake = obliged to make restoration

20
Q

what happened in attorney general refrence

A

D was overpaid and spent the money.

21
Q

what is the MR of theft

A

dishonestly section 2
&
intention to permanently deprive section 6

22
Q

is dishonestly defined?
if not how do we know what it means?

A

it is not defined but developed through case law.

23
Q

what 3 behaviours are not dishonest

A

1) believe a law in right to deprive the other of it
2) believe they would have the others consent
3) person who owns property cannot be discovered taking reasonable steps

must be a genuine belief.

24
Q

what was the old test of dishonesty and why was it removed

A

the gosh test.
it was removed as it was very subjectiveand resulted in inconsistencies

25
Q

what is the new updated test for dishonesty called and what are the elements

A

the new test is the Ivey test

1) individuals genuine belief compared to facts
2) compared to reasonable person

26
Q

R v velumyl

A

took money, intended to replace. but as he didn’t replace the exact notes, he had intention to permentatly deprive.

27
Q

is borrowing theft?

A

in the case of ‘Lloyd’ borrowing doesn’t amount to theft unless for a drastic period of time.

28
Q

R v Easom

A

defendant examined property to see if it was worth stealing but left it behind = not guilty.