theft Flashcards

1
Q

definition of theft (with sections)

A

theft is defined in (s.1) as:
dishonestly (s.2)
appropriating (s.3)
property (s.4)
belonging to another (s.5)
with the intention to permenantly deprive the other of it. (s.6)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the AR of theft

A

appropriation of property belonging to another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what does appropriation mean?

A

appropriation is assuming the rights of the owner without consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v morris

A

switching price labels = appropriation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what section and act if theft set out in?

A

section 1 of the theft act 1868

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

name me 5 types of property

A

1- money
2 things In action
3 personal property
4 real
5 intangible property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

r v vinnal

A

assuming the rights of the owner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

r v pitham

A

only the owner has the right to sell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

consenting can still amount to appropriation in what 2 cases

A

Lawrence and Gomez

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

name me a case for personal property and what happened in it

A

r v kelly and Lindsay. a dead body was defined as personal property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

name me a case for intangible property and what happened in it

A

Oxford v moss. knowledge from memorising the test is not considered intangible property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is s4 (3)

A

states that wild plants and animals cannot be stolen unless for commercial reward

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is section 5 - belonging to another defined as

A

wide definition of possession or control of property or a proprietary interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

r v turner

A

guilty of stealing his own car

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what was the legal precedent set in ‘rickets’

A

if you leave goods for someone else they belong to the original owner until the new owner takes possession of them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what happened in r v Webster

A

was accidentally given 2 war medals, kept one and sold the other. he was guilty of theft as the medal supplier had a proprietary interest.

17
Q

what is s.5 (3)

A

property received under obligation.

18
Q

give me a case example of section 5 subsection 3 of the theft act 1868

A

davidge - was given money by flat mates for gas bills but he used it for Christmas gifts = guilty for theft

19
Q

what does section 5(5) of the theft act 1968 state

A

property received by mistake = obliged to make restoration

20
Q

what happened in attorney general refrence

A

D was overpaid and spent the money.

21
Q

what is the MR of theft

A

dishonestly section 2
&
intention to permanently deprive section 6

22
Q

is dishonestly defined?
if not how do we know what it means?

A

it is not defined but developed through case law.

23
Q

what 3 behaviours are not dishonest

A

1) believe a law in right to deprive the other of it
2) believe they would have the others consent
3) person who owns property cannot be discovered taking reasonable steps

must be a genuine belief.

24
Q

what was the old test of dishonesty and why was it removed

A

the gosh test.
it was removed as it was very subjectiveand resulted in inconsistencies

25
what is the new updated test for dishonesty called and what are the elements
the new test is the Ivey test 1) individuals genuine belief compared to facts 2) compared to reasonable person
26
R v velumyl
took money, intended to replace. but as he didn't replace the exact notes, he had intention to permentatly deprive.
27
is borrowing theft?
in the case of 'Lloyd' borrowing doesn't amount to theft unless for a drastic period of time.
28
R v Easom
defendant examined property to see if it was worth stealing but left it behind = not guilty.