Theft Flashcards
S 1 Theft Act (1968) - important
Theft is the
-dishonest
- Appropriation
- Of property
- Belonging to another
- with intention to permanently deprive the other
S 3(1) Theft Act (1968) - important
Appropriation means ‘any assumptions of the rights of the owner’.
R v Gomez (1993) - important
Assuming any one right of the owner is enough for an appropriation.
R v Vinall (2011) - important
2 things
Both taking property and abandoning property amounts to an appropriation.
And
The timing of an appropriation is vital, because the AR and MR have to be present at the same time
Lawrence v Commissioner for the Met Police (1972) - important
It is possible for there to be an appropriation even if v consents
(eg handing over a wallet in this case)
S 4(1) Theft Act (1968) - important
Property includes ‘money and all other property, real or personal, including things in action and other intangible property’
S 5(1) Theft Act (1986) - important
property belongs to another is they have either ‘possession or control’ of it.
R Turner (1971) - important
It is possible for someone to steal their own property, if they have possession but someone else has control of it, e.g. a car temporarily in the control of a garage
R v Webster (2006) - important
D can steal property they own even if another has a ‘proprietary interest’ in it
Attorney General’s Reference no1 of 1983 (1985) - important
Property recieved by mistake is stolen if it is not retuerned when there is a legal obligation to do so
R v Barton amd Booth (2020) - important
Confirmed the test for Dishonesty from Ivey v Genting: What was D’s actual state of knowledge or belief as to the facts? Was D’s conduct dishonest by the standards of decent ordinary people.
S 2(1) Theft Act (1968) - important
D’s behaviour is not dishonest if D believes they have a legal right to the property; if D believes they would have had the other’s consent; or id D believes the owner cant be discovered by taking reasonable steps
R v Robinson (1977) - important
An example of a behaviour that is not dishonest is D taking money that they thought they were owed by V.
S 2(2) Theft Act (1968) - important
D’s willingness to pay for the property after they have been accused does not stop the appropriation from being dishonest.
R v Vinall (2011)
Abandonment of property
Abandoning a bike a distance away from where it was initially taken is intention to permanently deprive.