Theft^ Flashcards
R V Gomez (Theft)
Taking items from a shop shelf can be appropriation
R V Pitham & Hehl (Theft)
You do not need to deprive the owner of the property for appropriation
R V Hinks (Theft)
Appropriation can occur even with consent
R V Morris (Theft)
Assuming any one of the rights of the owner is appropriation
R V Lawrence (Theft)
Appropriation can occur even with consent
Oxford V Moss (Theft)
Info is not property under the Theft Act 1968
R V Lindsey & Kelly (Theft)
Body parts cannot be stolen except in this case they were (museum)
R V Turner (Theft)
It is possible to steal your own property
R V Webster (Theft)
Property belongs to whoever has a proprietary interest in it
Davidge V Bunnett (Theft)
If property is received under an obligation it must be dealt with in that way
Attorney’s General Reference (Theft)
Property recieved by mistake should be returned
R V Robinson (Theft)
If a person honestly believes they have a right in law to the property you are not being dishonest
Ivey V Casinos (Theft)
This case abolished the Ghosh test for dishonesty and created a two part test
R V Velumyl (Theft)
Exact property must be returned in order to for there not to be intention to permanently deprive
R V Easom (Theft)
A conditional intent is not enough for intention to permanently deprive
