Theft Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is the definition of theft?

A

section 1 of Theft Act 1968 -‘A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the actus reas parts of the theft definition?

A

s3- appropriates
24- property
s5- belonging to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the mens rea parts of the theft definition

A

s2- dishonestly

s6- intention of permanently depriving

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is appropriation?

A

s.3 (1) of theft act
‘an assumption by a person of the rights of the owner’
taking something belonging to another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

morris (1984)

A

switching of labels on property owned by supermarket, appropriating owners rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

appropriation by assuming the rights to sell:

A

R v Pitham and Hehl (1977)

offered to sell friends property who was in prison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

consent to appropriation:

A

Lawrence (1972)

D can appropriate an item with the consent of the owner if they thought that D was taking what was owed to him.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

theft with expressly or impliedly authorised by the owner of the goods or consented to him:

A

R v Gomez (1993),

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the maximum penalty for theft?

A

S. 7 sets out the maximum penalty for theft of 7 years.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what kind of offence is theft?

A

triable-either-way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

consent without deception

A

R v Hinks (2000) woman using older man, gifted her constitutes appropriation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

s.4 property

A

property includes money and all other property real or personal including things in action and other intangible property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

can dead bodies, body parts be considered as personal property?

A

yes

R v Kelly and Lindsay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is an example of property that is ‘things in action’

A

bank account

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

does confidential info pass as intangible property?

A

No

Oxford v Moss knowledge is not property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

s.5 belonging to another

A

property must belong to another, wide definition so prosecution does not have to prove who the legal owner is

17
Q

can owner be convicted of stealing his own property?

A

yes R v Turner , garage were in possession of his car until the payment is made, D guilty

18
Q

is it possible for someone to be in possession/control of property even though they do not know it was there?

A

yes R v Woodman , D took remaining scrap metal, convicted even though company had no knowledge of it

19
Q

items left at doorstep are in possession of whom?

A

in the possession of the person for whom the goods are left R v Basildon

20
Q

what is the law on property received by mistake?

A

Attorney-Generals Reference , D receieved over payment of wage, reognised yet did not return, convicted as there is an obligation to return it

in some cases there is no obligation to return money , R v Gilks

21
Q

s. 2 dishonestly

A

there are 3 exceptions where persons behaviour is not considered to be dishonest

22
Q

what are the 3 exceptions to dishonestly?

A
  1. believes he has a right in law
  2. believes he would have the others consent
  3. the owner cannot be discovered
23
Q

what is the case for exception 1) believes he has a right and actions are reasonable)

A

Small , thought car had been dumped

24
Q

what are the 2 sections of the ivy test?

A

a) what was D’s actual state of beliefs as to the facts

b) was his conduct dishonest by the standard of ordinary decent people?

25
Q

s6 intention to permanently deprive

A

the final element which is to be proved, treat the thing as his own to dispose off regardless of the other’s rights

26
Q

intention to permanently deprive remains true even if D intends to replace the money later

A

R v Velumyl (1989)

conviction upheld even though D intended to return the borrowed money, the same exact banknotes will not be returned

27
Q

borrowing is not theft unless it is for a period and in circumstances making it equivalent to an outright taking or disposal.

A

R v Lloyds

held that this meant borrowing it until the ‘goodness’ or practical value must have gone from the property

28
Q

DPP v J and others

A

took, broke v’s headphone, permanently depriving as they can no longer function in the same way they did

29
Q

DPP v Lavender

A

ruled that the dictionary definition of ‘dispose of’ was too narrow as a disposal can include ‘dealing with’ property

30
Q

conditional intent

A

where D examines property to see if there is anything worth stealing R v Easom, not convicted as conditional intent is not enough to convict

31
Q

a later assumption of a right

A

can be appropriation where d acquires property without stealing it, but later decides to keep it or deal with the property as the owner.

32
Q

‘belonging to another’ and property received under obligation

A

where property is handed over to D on basis that D will keep it for owner or deal with it in particular way, theft act tries to ensure property is still considered to ‘belong to another’
Davidge v Bunnet