The Working Memory Model (WMM) Flashcards
The Working Memory Model – an overview
Baddeley and Hitch (1974) proposed an alternative model to explain the short-term memory.
They rejected Atkinson and Shiffrin’s ideas about STM being a unitary store; they argued that it was more complex than simply being a temporary store involved in transferring information to LTM.
They saw STM as an ‘active processor’, holding several pieces of information while they were being worked on.
They explained STM as consisting of 4 key stores/components:
The Central Executive (oversees the three ‘slave systems’)
The Visuo-Spatial Sketchpad
The Phonological Loop
The Episodic Buffer (added to the model in 2000)
The Working Memory Model (WMM) – Revised- Baddeley and Hitch, 2000
(LOOK AT A DIAGRAM)
Components of the Working Memory Model
Central Executive
The most important component
It controls attention i.e. it receives information from the sense organs (e.g. ears, eyes) and decides what to attend to (it filters incoming information)
It plays a key role in directing information to and processing information from the ‘slave systems’ and LTM
It is involved in problem solving and decision-making
It has a limited storage capacity, so attention is limited at times
Components of the Working Memory Model
Phonological Loop (PL)
It processes speech-based sounds for brief periods
It has a limited capacity
It consists of two parts:
Phonological (Primary Acoustic) Store (inner ear) – stores
acoustically coded items e.g. words recently heard
Articulatory Control Process (inner voice) – allows sub-vocal repetition (rehearsal) of items stored in the phonological store
Components of the Working Memory Model
Visuo-Spatial Sketchpad (VSS)
Stores/processes visual and spatial information (inner eye) and the relationships between them i.e. what items are and where they are located
It helps individuals to navigate around and interact with their environment
It manipulates mental images
It has a limited capacity
Visual Cache
Stores visual information about form and colour
Inner Scribe
Deals with spatial and movement information e.g. body movements
Rehearses and transfers information in the visual cache to the central executive
Components of the Working Memory Model
Episodic Buffer
An additional temporary storage system
It binds together information from the different components into chunks/episodes, including information from LTM e.g. recalling a scene from a movie (visual and verbal information)
It has a limited capacity
Key assumption of the WMM
Baddeley proposed that because the STM consists of several different components that are able to work independently of one another, that it is therefore possible to complete a visual and a verbal task simultaneously e.g. watching a film/TV, which would involve different slave systems.
Coding and capacity
Central Executive
Coding
It processes information in all sensory forms
Capacity
Limited – it can only effectively cope with one strand of information at a time
Coding and capacity
Phonological Loop
Coding
Acoustically – it deals with auditory information (sensory information in the form of sound)
Capacity
Limited
Coding and capacity
Visuo-spatial sketchpad
Coding
Visually – information is coded and rehearsed through the use of mental pictures
Capacity
Limited
Coding and capacity
Episodic Buffer
Coding
Capable of processing both visual and auditory information
Capacity
Can potentially hold more than each of the two slave systems
One advantage of the Working Memory Model compared to the Multi-store Model of Memory is that……
…it suggests STM is an active processor rather than the unitary ‘stopping-off station’ version.
…it explains how it is easier to do two tasks that are different (e.g. verbal and visual) than two tasks that are similar (e.g. two verbal tasks).
Two similar tasks place too many demands on the same slave system (limited capacity), making it more difficult to process the information
Baddeley et al. (1973)
Procedure
Procedure: Laboratory study – ‘dual-task technique/performance’
Ppts had to track a moving spot of light whilst either imagining the letter ‘F’ and classifying the angles (Yes = included bottom/top line of letter; No = if it did not) or completing a verbal task.
They therefore compared participants doing two visual tasks, against those doing a visual and a verbal task.
Baddeley et al. (1973)
Findings
Participants found it more difficult to track the spot of light whilst classifying the angles of the letter ‘F’, because both tasks involved the visuo-spatial scratchpad, which has a limited capacity.
However, those doing the visual and verbal task found it less difficult to complete both tasks simultaneously, because they involved both the VSS and PL, therefore suggesting that the VSS is a separate slave system.
:) Brain-damaged patients
K.F. – damage to phonological loop following a motorcycle accident led to difficulty in processing auditory information, but not visual information.
L.H. – performed better on spatial than visual imagery tasks, supporting the view that there are separate visual and spatial systems.