The Wars of Independence (Scottish History) Flashcards
Evaluate Walter of Guisborough as a historical source.
Walter of Guisborogh was an English Monk, based in Yorkshire.
Pros:
- Monk accounts are meant to be unbiased record of events, therefor more likely to be accurate than accounts from key historical figures
Cons:
- His account of events is second hand (he is not an eye witness) and therefor may not be 100% accurate
- He may have pro-English bias
Evaluate Blind Harry as a historical source.
Blind Harry was a Scottish Bard (1470’s). He wrote the epic poem of the life of Wallace.
Cons:
- His account of events are semi-mythological (not necessarily 100% accurate - likely to be romanticised or biased)
- He was not alive during the time the events occurred, meaning his account is likely to he inaccurate
Evaluate The Chronicle of Lanercost as a historical source.
The Chronicle of Lanercost is an account of events written by English Monks.
Pros:
- May have first hand experience of Scottish raids
- Monk accounts are meant to be unbiased record of events, therefor more likely to be accurate than accounts from key historical figures
Cons:
- Information is second hand, meaning it may not be 100% accurate
- May be subject to pro-English bias (particularly as Lanercost is near the borders, where the English were subject to Scottish raids - more likely to view Scots in a negative light)
Evaluate the usefulness of John of Foudoun as a historical source.
John of Foudoun was a Scottish Monk writing in 1350.
Pros:
- May have had access to some first hand accounts - some of his information may be valid
Cons:
- His information is second hand, meaning it may not be 100% reliable
- He is writing decades after the events took place, information may not be accurate
- May contain pro-Scottish bias
Evaluate the usefulness of John Barbour as a historical source.
John Barbour was the author of a biography of Robert the Bruce in 1375.
Cons:
- Secondary information which may be inaccurate
- Written many decades after the events took place meaning less likely to be accurate account
- May be subject to pro-Scottish bias
During which period did John Balliol rule Scotland?
Balliol ruled from 1292-96
During which period did William Wallace begin his rebellion?
1297 marks the beginning of his rebellion, when he murders an English Sheriff.
1305 he is captured and sentenced to death for treason.
During which period did Robert the Bruce lead a successful rebellion against the English?
From 1307, upon his return from being in hiding, Bruce lead a successful rebellion against the English.
The rebellion ended in 1328, when Bruce was officials crowned King of Scotland in The Treaty of Edinburgh.
State at least 3 pieces of evidence that demonstrate the relationship between John Balliol and Edward I
The relationship between John Balliol and Edward I:
- Edward establishes his right to oversee Scottish legal cases in the MacDuff Case (1293)
- Edward reverses Balliol’s judgement on the MacDuff Case, humiliating John Balliol and making him appear weak
- Balliol makes alliance with France and Norway, Edwards enemies (1295)
- Following the English victory at the Battle of Dunbar (1296), Edward deprives Balliol of his crown and takes him as an English prisoner
This evidence suggests that the relationship between Balliol and Edward was hostile.
Explain the purpose of the Treaty of Birgham (1290)
The Treaty of Birgham was an agreement between Scotland and England, stating the terms under which Prince Edward II of England would eventually rule Scotland.
The treaty stated:
- Margaret, Maid of Norway would be wed to Edward II, of England
- Scotland shall remain separate and divided from the kingdom of England
- Scotlands Government shall remain intact
- Emblems of the Scottish crown shall remain in Scotland
- Election of Scottish Bishops will be freely held by the Scottish Nobility
- Scottish Lords are only required to pay homage in Scotland
State 3 reasons why Edward I was chosen by the Scottish Nobility to judge the Great Cause
Edward was asked to judge the Great Cause (1290) because:
- He was well educated and a legal expert
- He was neutral (does not have any connection to Bruce or Balliol)
- He was powerful enough to enforce his judgement, should there be a revolt
- He was viewed as a ‘friendly neighbour’ to the Scots
Why did the death of Alexander III create problems for Scotland?
The death of Alexander III created problems for Scotland because:
- He had no male heirs, his only direct heir was Margaret, Maid of Norway (his granddaughter). This was a problem for a number of reasons:
- There was a geographical divide between the Maid and Scotland as she was in Norway at the time of Alexander’s death.
- It was not acceptable for women to fight battles during the middle ages, therefor Margaret could not fully rule without being wed to a husband - creating rivalry over who she marries.
- The Maid of Norway was only three years old at the time of Alexander’s death, meaning she was not old enough to rule.
- As a young child, Margaret was extremely vulnerable. She was at a high risk of death (attacks, illnesses etc.)
What was the name of the document signed by the Scottish Nobles after their defeat in 1296?
Following their defeat at the Battle of Dunbar, the Scottish Nobility signed the Ragman’s Roll, confirming their allegiance to England
State at least two reasons why the Scots were unhappy with Edwards during 1296-7
Causes of discontent with Edward I’s rule 1296-7:
- There is a general loss of Scottish pride after the humiliating dethroning of John Balliol
- English sheriffs are imposed on the Scots. The Scots feel affronted by their arrogance
- Taxes are increased to pay for Edwards war with France
- Further English rule is imposed - Earl Warenne is appointed as Warden and Hugh Cressingham is appointed as treasurer
Explain why the English were at an advantage to the Scottish during the wars of independence.
Reasons for the English being at a millitary advantage to the Scots during the wars of independence:
- England had a far larger population, making it easier to raise taxes to fund wars
- England was generally a richer country and could afford better equipped soldiers; more armoured knights, archers etc.
- Some Scottish Nobles were reluctant to fight against the English because they were afraid of losing their land in England