THE VICTORIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM ;DOT POINTS 5-14 Flashcards
Define fairness
In the criminal justice system fairness refers to having a fair process and a fair hearing. It is being able to have a case heard in an impartial, objective manner without fear or favour to ensure the accused is treated without prejudice. It requires each individuals circumstances to be considered as fairness does not equal equality.
Define access
access is one of the principles of justice. When referring to access in the criminal justice system it means that all people should be able to access and understand their legal rights and pursue a case. It refers to the ability to make use of processes and institutes within the criminal justice system
Define equality
In the criminal justice system equality means that all people should be treated equally before the law with an equal opportunity to present their case. This means that there should be a process free from bias or prejudice with an impartial decision maker.
What is a committal proceeding?
committal proceedings are a part of pre-trial procedures. They take place in the Magistrates court when an accused has been charged with one or more indictable offences. and has pleaded not guilty.
What Is the purpose of committal proceedings?
act as a filtering system to test the strength of a prosecutions case and to give the accused the opportunity to understand the case and cross examine witnesses.It is considering the following factors
-can the case be heard summarily,
is there enough evidence to go to trial?,
has the accused pleaded guilty?
and will their be a fair trial?
What happens if committal evidence is sufficient?
If the magistrate find their is sufficient evidence to support conviction the accused is committed to stand trial and is either released on bail to wait for trial or held in remand
What is the final stage of committal proceedings and what does it involve?
committal hearing the committal hearings give the accused the oppurtunity to question the prosecution’s witnesses and make submissions about the charges. After the evidence and submissions, the magistrate decides whether or not to commit the accused
What happens if the committal evidence is not sufficient?
if the magistrate decides their is not sufficient evidence to support a conviction the accused is discharged and allowed to go free.If further evidence is found the accused can be brought before the court again, because the committal proceeding is not a trial and the accused has not been found guilty or not guilty
What occurs after a committal proceeding?
once sufficient evidence has been established and the accused is committed to trial, documents are transferred to the DPP who will file an indictment ( written statement of the details of the change) which will commence criminal proceedings. The accused can plead guilty at any time which will result in the case being listed for a plea hearing
Link the Purpose of committal proceedings to Fairness
committal procedures make sure that there is a fair trial by ensuring that the prosecutions case is disclosed to the accused, allowing the accused the opportunity to hear or read evidence and cross examine witnesses.This allows the accused to put forward a case in the early stages if they wish and ro properly prepare and present. case
Disadvantage of committal proceedings in relation to fairness
committal proceedings can add to the delay of getting a case to trial, which can reduce access to the criminal justice and also increase the risk of an unfair outcome. as a result one have suggested that strong cases should proceed directly to trial and bypass committal stage.
Advantage of committal proceedings in relation to equality
the onus (responsibility) is on the prosecution to establish to the court that there is enough evidence to support age conviction trial. if they cannot do that, the accused is discharges. this onus supports the principle that the accused is innocent until proven guilty and does not ned to prove anything at this stage
Link the purpose of committal proceedings to access
commmittal proceedings enable the courts to determine whether an indictable offence is appropriate to be heard and determined summarily. This gives the accused the opportunity to take advantage of court processes and institutes to pursue their case and get the best possible outcome
disadvantage of committal proceedings in relation to access 1
the services of a legal representative can be expensive. this adds to the cost of the accused, who may not me working if they are in remand, and could increased the risk of an unfair outcome
disadvantage of committal proceedings in relation to access
committal proceedings can contribute to the stress and trauma experienced by the accused and the victim and there families. for some victims this stress and trauma may see them not wanting to evidence which can reduce access to justice
define plea negotiations
plea negotiations encourage the early determinations of criminal cases without going to trial. It involves the discussion of the prosector and accused about the charges that have been laid.
What are the possible outcomes of plea negotiations?
- fewer charges( some charges may be dropped),
- lesser charges (an alternative offence with a lesser sentence)
What is one main condition of plea negotiations?
any negotiations are conducted without prejudice, meat ay offers made by either party cannot be used against them and the accused should feel free to negotiate wi though fear of what they say being used in court
What happens after a plea negotiation is completed?
once an agreement has been reached the accused will need to be sentenced by the court, who will be informed of the charges the accused has pleaded guilty to . before plea negotiations take place the victim should be considered
What is the aim of plea negotiations?
It aims to assist in resolving criminal cases by ensuring that a guilty plea adequately reflects the crime committed and that charges reflect the victims and communities values
How can plea negotiations improve access?
they can improve access as they reduce stress, cost, time, trauma and inconvenience, which benefits the accused and he victim as well as thew idea community.
What factors should be considered before starting plea negotiations?
- whether the accused is willing to cooperate with investigation or prosecution of a co-offender or other offenders
- strength of prosecution case
- the accused is willing to plead guilty
- witnesses may be reluctant or unable to give evidence
- a full trial may have adverse effects on victims/witnesses
- time and expense of full trial
What are some strengths of plea negotiations in reference to fairness?
- it ensures predetermination of criminal case
- victims and others are saved the trauma , inconvenience and distress of the trial process’
- for the accused the chance of a reduced sentence
What are some strengths of plea negotiations in reference to access?
-it saves the costs associated with a full trial or hearing
What are some strengths of plea negotiations in reference to equality?
the agreement can still reflect the criminality of the offender.
What are some weaknesses of plea negotiations in reference to fairness?
- Victims and community may feel that the accused is “let off” or will get lenient sentence
- the accused may feel pressured into accepting the deal
- negotiations are held privately an do not need to be disclosed
What are some weaknesses of plea negotiations in reference to equality?
- it avoids the need for the prosecutor to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt
- if the negotiations no not succeed either party may get an insight in to the other persons case
Define sentence indication
sentence indications cap the maximum sentence that may be imposed as long as the accused pleads guilty at first opportunity. Indictable offences can only be given if the accused applies for one and the prosecution agrees.
What is the aim of sentence indications?
so encourage early determination of criminal cases and to save time, cost, resources, stress and convenience of a trial haring as well as giver early closure to victim and families.
When are sentence indications binding?
only if the accused pleads guilty at first opportunity
When are sentence indications not binding?
If the accused does not plead guilty at the first opportunity a different judge must preside over the trial and the sentence is not binding
When do you not have to apply for a sentence indications?
when it is a summary offence.
Strengths of sentence indications
- can result in the early determination of the case
- can save money and resources
- can be conducted in open court= transparency
- the accused is not bound to accept
Weaknesses of sentence indications
- the judge is not obligated to grant the accused request of the sentence indication= if accused consider pleading guilty
- in higher courts the consent of the prosecution is needed.=limits regime
- for indictable offences the judge only needs to indicate if it would impose an immediate term of imprisonment
What is the original jurisdiction and appellate of the Magistrates court?
og- Can hear all summary cases and indictable offences heard summarily. It does all committal proceedings, bail and warrant applications
app- no appellate jurisdiction
What is the original and appellate jurisdiction of the County Court?
Og- indictable offences except murder, attempted murder,certain conspiracies and corporate offences
appellate- Cases from the magistrates on conviction or sentence
What is the original and appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court (TRIAL DIVISION) ?
Og- most serious indictable cases
app- cases from the magistrates court on points of law
What is the original and appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court (COURT OF APPEAL) ?
Og- none
Ap- appeals from the county court or the Supreme Court (TRIAL DIVISION)
What are the main reasons for having a court hierarchy?
allows for specialisation, meaning that different courts develop their own areas of expertise, in turn creating a more efficient and consistent system. Court hierarchy also allows for appeals, this provides fairness and allows for mistakes
Who is the appellant?
the party who appeals
Who is the respondent?
the other party in the case who has not appealed