The Teleological Argument Flashcards
overview of theories and scholars unit 1 topic 1
Aquinas’ Inductive Argument / Fifth Way
- observe beneficial order in the universe
- this could not happen by chance ‘not fortuitously, but designedly’
- objects do not have the intelligence to work towards a purpose or end
- ‘some intelligent being exists by whom all natural things are directed to their end’
- ‘and this being we call God’
The Inductive Leap
the seemingly large stretch between Aquinas stating the need for an intelligent designer, and then identifying this designer as God
Design Qua Regularity
the order and consistency observable in the universe (eg Newtonian physics) is evidence of a designer
Design Qua Purpose
the universe and everything in it seem to fulfil a purpose - this is evidence of a designer
Summa Theologica
text in which Aquinas outlines his ‘Five Ways’ aiming to show faith can be founded in reason
The ‘prime mover’
Aristotle’s idea that whatever caused the universe to enter a state of motion is in a state of unchanging actuality. Used as the foundation of Aquinas’ Inductive Argument
Paley’s Analogical Argument overview
- if you see a rock on a heath, you would likely assume it has always been there in that state due to its simplicity
- if you were to see a watch, even if you had never come across one before, you would assume it had an intelligent maker due to its complexity
- the universe too is intricate and complex, so implies an intelligent designer
- ‘the marks of design are too strong. design must have a designer. that designer is God.’
Paley’s criteria for a complex item
- specific materials
- several parts
- works to a purpose or end
- regular motion
- indispensable parts
the crux of Paley’s Analogical Argument
‘like effects have like causes’
the type of argument Paley’s Analogical Argument is
inductive; a posteriori; argument by analogy
argument by analogy
inductive argument which likens familiar situation to less similar situation and suggests that to maintain consistency, the same conclusions must be drawn about them
telos
Greek term meaning purpose/aim/end
According to Aristotle: the ‘final cause’ required for something to exist, and the goal it naturally tends towards
teleology
account of a given thing’s purpose as an explanation of the cause of the thing
inductive reasoning / arguments
cannot prove, but try to persuade by providing evidence from human experience in support of the conclusion
a posteriori
knowledge gained by logical deductions made from observation and experience of the material world
Natural Theology
the text in which Paley gives his analogical argument as a Christian apologist in attempts to prove faith can be grounded in reason
strengths of inductive thinking
- relies on experience that may be universal or at least testable
- relies on accepting the nature of evidence
- demands overwhelmingly good reasons for accepting the conclusion is the most likely
weaknesses of inductive thinking
- alternative conclusions may be just as convincing
- can only say if certain phenomena are the case we may be able to make certain claims about them
- often more than one possible conclusion
general weaknesses of Paley’s analogical argument
- appears to be assuming order in the universe simply because there is order in a watch
- unclear if the watch is analogous to the world or whole universe
- is the world not too different to the watch to withstand comparison
revealed theology
we can see god exists and gives order to the world through revelations given from god to humans
Paley’s response to evidence of bad design
watches often go wrong, this does not mean they were not designed. it may simply be we do not understand the full workings of the world and less competent then the designer
Cleanthes
character in Hume’s ‘Dialogues’ who using natural theology argues from the world to God, stating there are parallels between design present in the world, and design of the world, and like effects have like causes
Demea
Character in Hume’s ‘Dialogues’ who comes from a position of faith
Philo
character in Hume’s ‘Dialogues’ who acts as a spokesperson for Hume’s own views. Comments on how the universe may well have come about through chance, and that even if there are the grounds to assume the universe was designed, there are not the grounds to make claims about the character or nature of the designer
Paley’s analogical argument assumptions
3
- assumes analogy is appropriate
- assumes effects are predictable
- assumes existence of god from evidence of design
the effectiveness of analogy
can only say with certainty the conclusion of the observed situation. any slight change from the original situation may yield different conclusions. the more the conditions change, the lesser the confidence in induction
Hume’s limitation of the design argument
the argument may be able to ‘assert the universe arose sometime, from something like design: but beyond that position he cannot ascertain one single circumstances’
Hume on the nature of a universal designer
cannot confidently make any claims - for all we know we could be ‘the first rude essay of some infant deity’, or many deities cooperating together
Paley’s view on goodness of the designer
would only be unjustified in attributing goodness to the designer if the world were an unbearable place, and ‘it is a happy world after all’
Paley’s view on the amounts of suffering vs goodness
‘happiness is the rule; misery is the exception’ eg we are shocked when we hear a friend is ill, but are not when we hear they are experiencing happiness
Schopenhauer’s view on misery vs happiness
misery outweighs happiness. ‘compare the respective feelings of two animals, one of which is engaged in eating the other’ ‘we generally find pleasure not so pleasant as we expected, and pain very much more painful’
Paley v Hume view of nature
sees the design and creation of a benevolent God vs sees ‘nothing but the idea of a blind nature’
Paley: attributing omnipotence to a designer
perfectly reasonable - a being capable of creating this universe much have power infinitely beyond power we have experience of, and infinite power equates to omnipotence
Ockham’s Razor
the principle that the simplest hypothesis is generally preferable
infinite regress
Hume’s argument that if human-like intelligence appears designed and humans have a designer, then so must the designer of humans and so forth
analogical argument premises
1 - there exists an object in nature (n) resembling a manmade artifact (m) in a significant way (R)
2 - m has R because it was created deliberately by human design
3 - similar effects have similar causes
conclusion: probable that n has R because was designed by something with human-like intelligence