The Supreme Court case studies Flashcards
after the 2019 Gina Miller ruling the Daily Mail printed a photo of all the justices and labelled them traitors
media reactions to the supreme court rulings
Scottish Gender Reform Act 2023
(scottish high court) ruled that the Scottish government overstepped its powers in attempting to update laws on gender identitity as it contradicted those set out in the 2010 equality act
Gina Miller case 2017
ruled that the executive was ultra vires in proroguing parliament
Scottish Independence Referendum case of 2022
ruled that there should only be one referendum per generation and thus the Westminster government was interpreting the 1998 Scotland Act correctly - lead to the resignation of Nicola Sturgeon as first minister
in 2011, the UK parliament votes against giving prisoners the right to vote despite the European Court of Human Rights ruling they had to
failure of the ECHR to get the UK government to act
Steinfeld and Keidan vs the Secretary of State for International Development 2018
the supreme court allowed the appeal and ruled that civil partnerships should not discriminate against heterosexual couples. forced the government to act when they ammended the 2004 Civil Partnerships Act in 2019
the ECHR stopped Brown from freezing terrorist assets
an example of the UKSC forcing the UK government to act
the 2004 Belmarsh Case
- did force Blair to release prisoners
- but parliament tightened UK government powers e.g. could effectively put suspects under house arrest in the 2005 Prevention of Terrorism Act
the Rwanda Bill
the SC stood up to the UK government by ruling that the policy was contrary to the Human Rights Act.
- however in response the UK government passed a law saying Rwanda was safe - basically legalised their actions
Shamima Begum case
SC rules that home secretary wasn’t ultra vires (maybe more cautious after Daily Mail’s comments)
after 9/11 Blair passed anti-terror laws which undermined the Human Rights Act
shows rights protection has not increased and supreme court is weak in enforcing them
conservative governments have threatened to leave ECHR and repeal the HRA - want to replace it with a weaker bill of rights
shows rights are not effectively protected, especially since they are not entrenched or codified in a constitution