Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

Politics US - New > The Supreme Court > Flashcards

The Supreme Court Flashcards

1
Q

How many justices make up the supreme court

A

9

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who nominates them

A

The president

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How are they confirmed

A

By the Senate - a simple majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How long do they serve

A

Life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the only ways justices leave the court

A

Death
Voluntarily retire
Impeachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the difference between strict and loose constructionists

A

Strict - interprets the consitution strictly or literally
Stresses the retention Of power by individual states

Loose - interprets the constitution less literally
Stresses the broad range of power to the federal government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Give names of some strict constructionist judges

A 
Roberts
Thomas
Alito
Gorsuch
Barrett
Kavanaugh
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Give names of loose constructionist judges

A

Ruth bader ginsburg
Breyer
Sotomayor
Kagan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a swing justice

A

Pivotal justice in an otherwise evenly balanced court. Who will often be in the position of casting the deciding vote

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is meant by living constitution

A

The constitution considered as a dynamic living document. Interpretation of which should take into account contemporary society’s views

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is meant by an originalist

A

A supreme court justice who interprets the constitution in line with the meaning or intent of the framers at the time of enactment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Give an example of an originalist justice

A

Scalia (1986-2016)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How would you classify former justice Anthony Kennedy

A

Swing justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the five stages of the appointment and confirmation process

A

1) vacancy occurs
2) president instgates a search for possible nominees and interviews short listed candidates
3) president announces nominee
4) the senate judiciary committee holds a confirmation hearing on the nominee and makes a recommendatory vote
5) nomination is debated and voted on in the full senate. A simple majority is required for confirmation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What has changed in the way the senate now votes on supreme court nominees

A

Voting is usually along party lines

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Identify 3 significant critcisms of the appointments and confirmation process

A

Any 3 from
Presidents have tended to politicise the nominations by attempting to choose justices who share their politcal views and judicial philosophy eg obama with kagan and trump with gorsuch
The senate has tended to politicise confirmation process by focussing more on hot button issues (eg women’s rights) than qualifications
Members of the senate judiciary committee from the president’s party tend to ask soft questions of nominee
Members of the senate judiciary committee from the opposition party attempt, through their questions to attack or embarras the nominee rather than elicit relevant information
Justices are now frequently confirmed on party line votes (Gorsuch)
Media conduct a “feeding frenzy” often connected with matters of trivia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Give three reasons why these nominations are said to be the most important thing a president will do

A

Any three of
They occur infrequently
They are for life
Just one new appointee to a 9 member body can significantly change its philosophical balance
The supreme court has the power of judicial review
Their decisions will profoundly affect the lives of ordinary americans for generations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is meant by the power of judicial review

A

The power of the supreme court to declare Acts of congress, Actions of the executive, Acts or actions of state governments unconstitutional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

How did judicial review come about

A

It was “found” by the court in Marbury v Madison (1803) regarding a federal law and used again in Fletcher v Peck (1810) regarding state law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What does it mean to say that the power of judicial review turns the court into a quasi legislative body

A

Because the effects of its decisions have almost the effect of a law having been passed by congress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is meant by judicial activism

A

An approach to judicial decision making that holds that judges should use their position to promote desirable social ends, even if that means overturning the decisions of elected officials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Give two recent examples of the court decisions reshaping american society

A

Any two of
Roe v Wade 1973 - guaranteed a woman’s right to choose an abortion
District of Columbia v Heller 2008 guaranteed individual gun ownership rights
Obergefell v Hodges 2015 guaranteed right to same sex marriage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is meant by judicial restraint

A

An approach to judicial decision making that holds that judges should defer to the legislative and executive branches, and to precedent established in previous court decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Give 2 examples of recent supreme court decisions relating to freedom of religion and explain the signifcance of both

A

Zelman v simmons-harris 2002 - the court upheld an ohio state programme giving financial aid to parents, allowing them, if they chose, to send their children to a religious or private school
Significance - state govt money could be finding its way to a religious private school
Town of Greece v Galloway 2014 - the court allowed legislative bodies (eg town councils) to begin their meetings with prayer.
Significance - strengthened individual rights to practise their religion in public, even in state constituted and state funded bodies
Burnwell v Hobby Lobby stores 2010. The court overturned the requirement under the Affordable Care Act 2010 that family owned firms had to pay for health insurance coverage for contraception as this violated the religous beliefs of some christian run companies
Significance - strengthened invididual rights of christian business executives to run their companies along lines that agreed with their religious beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Give 2 examples of recent supreme court decisions relating to freedom of speech and explain the significance of each
Any two of McConnell v Federal Election Commision 2004. Upheld federal law (bipartisan campaign reform act) banning soft money in election campaigns stating that this ban did not violate freedom of speech Significance - limiting campaign finance is not incompatible with the freedom of speech provision of the constitution Citizens United v FEC 2010 ruled that when it comes to rights of political speech, business corporations and labour unions have the same rights as individuals Significance - opened the door to unlimited spending by corporations in election campaigns mostly funnelled through PACs McCutcheon v FEC 2014 the court struck down a 1970’s limit on totals that wealthy individuals can contribute to candidates and PACs Significance reaffirmed giving of money to candidates and PACs as a fundamental right
26
What was the significance of recent supreme court decisions about gun control
DC v Heller 2008 gun rights are individual Never before had the courts rules this interpretation of the second amendment
27
What was the significance of recent supreme court decisions on the death penalty
The court was clearly seen as telling us what 18 century words mean in 21 century america
28
Give 2 examples of recent supreme court decisions relating to abortion and explain their significance
Any 2 Roe v wade 1973 ruled that the state law of texas forbidding abortion was unconstitutional Significance - guaranteed a womans right to choose an abortion as a constitutionally protected right Whole woman’s health v Hellerstedt 2016 stuck down as unconstitutional two parts of a texas state law concerning abortion provision Significance - not all limits on a woman’s right to choose whould be regarded as constitutionally permissable June Medical Services v Russo 2020 - no hospital restrictions placed on clinics Whole woman’s health v Jackson 2021 - abortion providers could not sue state officials who upheld SB8 (texas heartbeat act) Dobson v Jackson woman’s health pending 2022 - ruling about 2018 mississippi law which outlaws abortion after 15 weeks
29
Give 2 examples of recent supreme court decisions relating to marriage equality and explain their significance
Any two United States v Windsor 2013 declared the Defense of Marriage Act 1996 to be unconstitutional and that it is unconstitutional to treat same sex married couples differently from other married couples in terms of federal benefits Obergefell v Hodges 2015 declared that state bans on same sex marriage were unconstitutional
30
Give 3 reasons why the supreme court is a political institution
Appointed by a politician - the president Confirmed by politicians - the senate Makes decisions on issues that feature in elections (eg abortion, gun control, marriage equality) that the 2 main parties disagree over Some of its decisions have quasi - legislative effect. It is as if a new law has been passed and passing laws is what politicians do Some have described the court as a “third house of the legislature”
31
Give 3 reasons why the supreme court is not a political institution
Its members are judges not politicans The court is independent - not subject to political pressure Judges do not involve themselves in party politics, elections, campaigning or endorsing candidates There is no such thing as a democratic justice or a republican justice Members make decisions based on legal and constitutional argument not political ideology
32
Give an example of a recent supreme court decision on the powers of congress
National federation of independent buisness v sebelius 2012 Upheld most of the provisions of the ACA 2010 but ruled that the requirement for every american to take out insurance or pay a penalty was not justified under commerce clause only by power to collect taxes
33
Give an example of a recent supreme court decision on the powers of the president and explain significance
National labor relations board v noel canning 2014 Ruled obamas recess appointments to NLRB in 2012 were unconstitutional as senate technically not in recess Significance - court showes its power to say what congress and the president can and can not do according to its interpretation of their respective powers
34
Give 2 examples of the way congress can check the supreme court
Any 2 of Senate has the power to confirm or reject appointments Congress fixes the numerical size of the court Congress can initiate constitutional ammendments that would have the effect of enhancing or decreasing the courts perceived legitimacy Congress has the power of impeachment - even the threat is a check
35
Give 2 ways the president can check the supreme court
He has the power to nominate justices Can decide whether or not to throw his political weight behind a decision of the court thereby either enhancing or decreasing the court’s perceived legitimacy
36
Give 2 other factors that can act as checks on the supreme court
Any 2 of The court has no power of initiation - it must wait for cases to be brought before it The court has no enforcement powers. It is dependent on the other branches of the government/rule of law for implementation of and obedience to court decisions Public opinion - if the court makes decisions that are regarded as wrong by a majority of the public the court loses some of its legitimacy The court is checked by itself - by decisions it has already made The court is checked by the constitution - although certain parts of the constitution are open to the court’s interpretation other parts are v specific
37
reasons why supreme court might be said to have too much power
Court gave itself the power of judicial review It has declared more acts of congress unconstitutional as the decades have passed It has made decisions that are out of line with the majority of public opinion It is an unelected body It has abused its power to bring about significan policy change (eg abortion, same sex marriage) If justices believe in a living constitution
38
Give reasons why the supreme court does not have too much power
It is checked by congress, which may initiate constitutional amendements effectively overriding court decisions Congress has the power of impeachment It has not initiative power - it must wait for cases to come before it It is dependent upon the rule of law and other branches of government to enforce its decisions Public opinion is a restraining force on the courts power It is checked by the words of the constitution where it is precise and not open to interpretation by the court
39
Give 3 ways in which the US and UK supreme courts differ in terms of their origins
US court created by founding fathers in 1787 UK court created by act of parliament in 2009 US court written into constitution UK court written into Act of Parliament US court first federal court ever created UK court last UK court to be created
40
Give 2 reasons for the differences in which the US and UK supreme courts differ in terms of their origins
US system based on “separated institutions sharing powers” UK system based on “fused powers. US system product of revolution UK system product of evolution
41
How does the appointment processes to the US and UK supreme courts differ
US - nominated by the president and confirmed by the senate | UK - nominated by the Judicial appointments commission (no confirmation required)
42
How do the two supreme courts differ in terms of the tenure of the judges
US - lifetime tenure | UK - must retire at 70 if appointed after 1995 otherwise 75
43
Name three potential sources of pressure on judicial independence
``` Any threee of The executive The legislature Pressure groups The media Other (senior) judges ```
44
Give 2 ways in which judicial independence is protected
Any two of Immunity from prosecution for acts carried out as judges Immunity from lawsuits of defamation for what they say while hearing cases Salaries can not be reduced
45
Roe v Wade
1973 Ruled by 7:2 that state restricted abortion was unconstitutional Reaffirmed in Planned parenthood v Casey 1992 Has been impacted by conservative changes to state laws eg Texas Heartbeat Act Whole womans Health v Jackson 2021 - 5:4 ruling against whole woman’s health making it harder to obtain an abortion in Texas Awaiting rulings Dobbs v Jackson Womens Health Organisation - likely to be conservative ruling
46
Rucho v Common Cause
2018 Regarding partisan gerrymandering Court ruled 5:4 that although partisan gerrymandering may be “incompatible” with democratic priciples federal courts could not review such cases because they are outside the courts remit
47
Trump v Vance
2020 5:4 decision Ruled that absolute immunity (from state criminal subpoenas) is not granted by the supremacy clause or article II of the constitution
48
Trump v Mazars
2020 7:2 ruling Court must take into account separation of powers when resolving disputes over congressional subpoenas relating to personal information about the president
49
Shelby county v Holder
2013 5:4 decision Section 4B of the Civil Rights Act was unconstitutional because the coverage formula was based on data that was over 40 years old You can not subject a state to preclearance based on past discrimination
50
Citizens United v FEC
2010 Related to campaign finance and free speech 5:4 decision Said that BCRA (Bipartisan campaign reform act) section 203 which said all independent expenditures by corporations was prohibited was unconstitutional as it clashed with first amendment rights This decision allowed big money back into politics
51
NFIB v Sebelius
2012 5:4 decision Court upheld congress’ power to enact most of the provisions of the ACA Justice Roberts opinion held that making people buy health insurance or face a fine must be done as part of congress’ taxing powers
52
Obergefell v Hodges
2015 5:4 ruling Court ruled that state bans on same sex marriage were unconstitutional
53
New York State Rifle & Pistol association v Bruen
Awaiting ruling Hearing as to whether the second amendment allows the government to prohibit people from carrying handguns outside their home in self defence Brought by NYSRP to clarify mish mash of existing state laws
54
District of Columbia v Heller
2008 5:4 ruling Court affirmed rights under 2nd ammendment Stated that DC handgun ban (and other restrictions) went against this amendment First SCOTUS case that provided clarity on whether gun rights were individual rights or a right intended for a militia
55
Bostock v Clayton County
2020 7:2 ruling Ruled that the civil rights act does protect gay and transgender people from employability discrimination
56
Department of Homeland Security v Regents of the University of California
2020 5:4 decision Court determined that the decision to rescind the DACA (deferred action for childhood arrivals) program was “arbitary and capricious” and reversed the order
57
What does DACA stand for
Deferred action for childhood arrivals
58
Whole womans health v Hellerstedt
2016 5:3 ruling Texas can not place restricitons on the delivery of abortion services that create a burden on women seeking abortion
59
June medical services v Russo
2020 5:4 decision Placing hospital admission requirements on abortion clinics was unconstitutional
60
US v Carpenter
2018 5:4 decision Government needs a warrant to access a persons cellphone location history Because it is a search under the 4th amendment
61
Bourmediene v Bush
2008 5:4 opinion found that the constitution guaranteed right of habeas corpus review applies to persons held in Guantanamo
62
Fisher v university of texas
2016 University had a race concious admissions policy Court said it was applied correctly but that the university has an ongoing obligation to use available data to “assess whether changing demographics have undermined the need for a race conscious policy”
63
Dobson v Jackson Women’s Health
Pending expected 2022 | Constitutionality of 2018 Mississippi state law banning abortion after 15 weeks
64
Whole Woman’s Health v Jackson
2021 5:4 Dismissal of case that abortion providers could sue state officials enforcing SB8 (texas heartbeat act) This now means that in texas it is vitually impossible to get an abortion
65
Texas v California
``` 2021 7:2 ruling Dealt (again) with constitutionality of ACA 3rd time it had come before SC ACA held to be constitutional ```
66
Zelman v simmons-harris
2002 - the court upheld an ohio state programme giving financial aid to parents, allowing them, if they chose, to send their children to a religious or private school
67
Town of Greece v Galloway
2014 allowed legislative bodies (eg town councils) to begin their meetings with prayer. Significance - strengthened individual rights to practise their religion in public, even in state constituted and state funded bodies
68
Burnwell v Hobby Lobby Stores
2010. overturned the requirement of ACA 2010 that family owned firms had to pay health insurance coverage for contraception as this violated the religous beliefs of some christian run companies Significance - strengthened invididual rights of christian business executives to run their companies along lines that agreed with their religious beliefs
69
McConnell v Federal Election Commision
2004. Upheld bipartisan campaign reform act which banned soft money in election campaigns stating that this ban did not violate freedom of speech
70
McCutcheon V FEC
2014 struck down a 1970’s limit on totals that wealthy individuals can contribute to candidates and PACs Significance reaffirmed giving of money to candidates and PACs as a fundamental right
71
Defense of mariage Act
1996 Marriage between a man and a woman This act allowed states to refuse to recognise same sex marriages
72
US v Windsor
2013 Ruled that section 3 of DOMA unconstitutional Federal benefits must be applied to same sex marriages
73
Ring v Arizona
2002 Death sentances imposed by judges unconstitutional under 6th amendment (Right to trial by jury)
74
Roper v simmons
2005 | Applying death penalty to crimes committed when under 18 unconstitutional
75
Baze v Rees
2008 Leathal injection NOT cruel and unusual punishment So constitutional under 8th amendment

Politics US - New (5 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions