The Strange Situation and it's implications Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Who conducted the original Strange Situation study and when?

A

Ainsworth and Bell (1970)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the Strange Situation?

A

A method of measuring the quality of attachment by placing the infant in a unfamiliar situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How many stages are there in the Strange Situation procedure?

A

8

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Approximately how long should each phase of the procedure last?

A

3 minutes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does the observers measuring during the experiment?

A

The infants behaviour; specifically the levels of stranger anxiety and separation anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What experimental method is used?

A

It is a controlled experiment = Lab observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe briefly the 8 stages of the Strange Situation

A
  1. Mother and Baby introduced to the room
  2. Mother is passive while baby explores the room
  3. A stranger enters the room and talk to the mother then gradually approaches the baby with a toy
  4. SEPARATION EPISODE - Mother leaves the baby and stranger in the room and the stranger tries to engage with him/her
  5. REUNION EPISODE - Mother returns and greets the baby (stranger leaves)
  6. SEPARATION EPISODE #2 - Mother leaves and baby is in the room alone
  7. Stranger returns and tries to engage with the baby
  8. Mother returns and picks up the baby, stranger leaves
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What 4 specifics did the researchers observe?

STAR

A
  1. separation anxiety symptoms
  2. the infants willingness to explore
  3. anxiety towards stranger
  4. reunion behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What year did Ainsworth compile her findings from the Strange Situation experiments?

A

1978

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What 3 categories were established as a result of the findings from the Strange Situation experiments?

A

Insecure avoidant - TYPE A
Insecure resistant - TYPE C
Securely attached - TYPE B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What percentage of Ainsworth’s results were securely attached?

A

66%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What percentage of Ainsworth’s results were Insecure avoidant?

A

22%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What percentage of Ainsworth’s results were Insecure resistant?

A

12%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How were the percentages of Ainsworth’s results split between the three categories?

A

Securely attached = 66%
Insecure Avoidant = 22%
Insecure Resistant = 12%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What ‘Type’ Is insecure avoidant?

A

TYPE A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What ‘Type’ is Securely attached?

A

TYPE B

17
Q

What ‘Type’ is Insecure Resistant?

A

TYPE C

18
Q

Discuss how the infants in Type B reacted in the Strange Situation experiment

A

Overall - mother and stranger treated very differently

  • babies played happily while mother was there
  • play was seriously disrupted and upset when mothers left
  • stranger had no effect when mother was present
  • immediate comfort on reunification with mother
  • stranger + baby = upset
19
Q

Discuss how the infants in Type A reacted in the Strange Situation experiment

A

Overall - mother and stranger treated very similarly

  • showed indifference towards mother
  • play hardly affected in mother’s presence or absence
  • few signs of distress when she left and ignored/avoided her when she returned
  • most distress when left alone
20
Q

Discuss how the infants in Type C reacted in the Strange Situation experiment

A

Overall - ambivalent towards mother

-fussy and wary even when mother was present and they cried a lot more than others
-mother left = very distressed
-mother returned = ambivalent towards her: seeking contact but at the same time showing anger and resisting contact
- e.g. they would put their arms out to be
picked up then immediately struggle to
get down

21
Q

Identify the strengths of the strange situation

A
  • Its findings have has very influential implications
  • Warner et al 1984 = research to support the reliability of the study which found that 78% of children were classified as having the same attachment type at ages 1 and 6
22
Q

Identify the Weaknesses of the Strange Situation

A
  • Unreasonable to generalise - findings are restricted to middle class American infants = culturally biased
  • Validity issues as it appears to measure specific relationships, not general characteristics
  • RESEARCH EVALUATION:
    Lamb (1977) found that an infant may be securely attached with their mother, yet insecure avoidant with their father
    Main and Cassidy (1988) in a later Strange Situation style study they identified another classification group = disorganized. These children showed inconsistent behaviour, confusion and indecision.
23
Q

What 3 researches can be used to evaluate strange situation?

A

+Warner et al (1984) - attachment types over time

  • Lamb (1977) - attachment differs between parents
  • Main and Cassidy (1988) - disorganized children
24
Q

in Warner et al (1984)’s study what percentage of children were classified as having the same attachment type at ages 1 and 6

A

78%

25
Q

What was the 4h classification group that Main and Cassidy theorised and what year did they do so?

A

1988 - disorganized children

26
Q

What is the potential further analysis of the Strange situation?
(hint: pyramid diagram)

A

There is potentially cyclical effects, for example the behaviour of a care giver towards their securely attached child will create a positive and loved internal working model of itself, which in turn, would make them behave better, meaning the care givers behaviour can remain positive towards them.