The State and State formation Flashcards
Neoclassical Theory of economics
A theory of rational choice
Public choice theory
This is the idea of economics being applied to politics. That is, applying neoclassical economics to understand the functioning of politics
Property rights
Property rights are important to the state (in contract theory) because they serve as a means of regulating or limiting societal activities in order for the state to serve as a wealth maximizer for society i.e. achieve economic growth. The way this can be done is through property rights. However, in the predatory theory of the state property rights are important because they maximize the revenue of a very specific group or class in society that controls the state.
A state
An organization with a comparative advantage in violence, extending over a geographic area whose boundaries are determined by its power to tax constituents.
Contract theory of the state
This is the idea that the state places the role of a wealth maximizer for society. This idea of maximizing societal wealth manifests as economic growth, and in order to induce economic growth, you have to limit the activities and behaviors of individuals relative to others. To achieve this sort of societal stability requires contracts. This theory specifically explains why contracting initially is really important but does not explain maximizing behavior of individuals with diverse interests.
Predatory theory of the state (Marxist)
This is the idea that the state is an agency of a specific group or class in society and its main function is to extract income from the rest of its constituents in the interest of that very specific group of people. So in a predatory theory of the state, property rights are meant to maximize the revenue of that specific group or class in power, regardless of its impact on the wealth of the society as a whole. The theory ignores initial gains of contracting and focuses on the extraction of rents from individuals by groups who gain control of the state.
Distribution of violence potential
What makes contract theory and predatory theory of the state similar is the distribution of violence potential; where contract theory assumes an equal distribution of violence potential amongst individual in power and predatory theory assumes an unequal distribution.
North’s neoclassical theory of the state
To understand the state north says we need to understand three characteristics of the state. The first is that a state trades protection and justice for private property in exchange for revenue from its constituents. The second is that the state will try and act like a discriminating monopolist. The third is that the state is constrained by the opportunity cost (the cost of an outside opportunity) of its constituents. That is, there are rivals external to the state that can provide justice and protection to constituents and this is what checks the state and makes them credibly commit to providing justice and protection, because if they don’t they won’t be able to extract revenue from constituents and maximize societal wealth.
Economies of scale
In North’s neoclassical theory of the state, because there are economies of scale in organization within a state providing justice and protection to its constituents versus each individual protecting their own property, total income in a society will increase, which is in line with what a wealth-or utility-maximizing ruler desires.
Discriminating monopolist
This is the idea that in North’s neoclassical theory of the state, a state will try and separate groups of constituents and create property rights schemes for each so that they can maximize state revenue. This is, property rights will look different for each group in society and the uniqueness of the property rights will allow for the state to maximize revenue as best it can from each group.
Degree of monopoly power
This is the idea that in North’s neoclassical theory of the state, the state is constrained in its behavior by the opportunity cost of its constituents by external rivals who can provide justice and protection of expropriation, so the ability for the state to be a monopoly requires that the provisions offered to constituents by rivals be weak in their ability to substitutes the state.
Contractual rules of the game
In North’s theory of the state, the state provides justice and protection over property rights of its constituents, but this needs to be established either unwritten (feudal manor) or as a written constitution. What these unwritten and written rules do is specify cooperation and competition which provides a structure for property rights. That is, who owns factor and product markets for maximizing rents accruing to the ruler, and how do we reduce transaction costs in order to get more taxes for the state for those who are maximizing rent.
The fundamental dichotomy of the state
North contends that the cause of the failure of society to experience sustained economic growth is the tension between the ownership structure which maximizes rents to the ruler (and his group) and an efficient system that reduces transaction costs and encourages economic growth.
Utility function of the ruler and agents of the ruler
This is the idea that in order to enforce property rights a ruler needs to create infrastructure to do this. This, however, requires that the ruler delegate some power to agents of the ruler. The ruler and the agents do not have the same utility function with regard to how property rights should be designed and as such because of the incongruence, monopoly rents will be lost by the state.
Supply curve of protection
This is the idea that it is expected that the ruler and the constituents enter a contractual agreement where the ruler provides protection and justice and the constituents provide revenue. However, the shape of the supply curve of protection plays a role in if the ruler is able to do this. That is, if the supply curve is u-shaped, that is as you increase protection it gets more costly to do so, the state will not be able to uphold its end of the bargain and as such rivals (other states, individuals, groups) serve as substitutes for the states protection and there again is a loss of revenue that should be the states.