The Rule of Tsar Nicholas II Flashcards
What can be said about the character of Nicholas II?
Nicholas was weak-willed, poorly educated and lacking in confidence, he was also known to be a bad judge of people and very devious. Many believed that Nicholas lacked the taste for power that was required of a strong autocratic leader.
Nicholas could be very obstinate, as shown when he made the decision to lead the Russian army in WWI.
Nicholas could also be benevolent and kind and was know for being a family orientated man.
What can be said about the attitudes of Nicholas II?
Nicholas’ attitude in governing was based upon a firm belief in God and a sense of duty as well as rigid belief in autocracy. The tsar believed that tsarism and religion were inextricably linked. He prioirtised the preservation of the Romanov Dynasty and believed it was his duty to be as strong as his father had been.
What can be said about Nicholas’ abilities?
Although the eventual fall of the Romanov dynasty and Russia falling to revolution and a state of civil war is often blamed on Nicholas, it is possible to commend him for his ability to bring about reform. This is evident through the establishment of the dumas, he was able to enforce his reforms with a firm hand.
What were the four main political problems in Russia in 1894?
Opposition had grown against the reactionary and repressive measures of Alexander III, the most pressing were:
1) The centralised control of the police under the minister of the interior.
2) The replacement of the elected Justices of the Peace with Land Captains.
3) A rise in censorship
4) Tighter control of the Zemstva (provincial governments) and a reduction of peasant representation these organisations.
What were the five main economic problems facing Russia in 1894?
1) A lack of productivity compared with international rivals.
2) A lack of free enterprise, the tsar an his ministers directed production by controlling the armaments industry and the railway.
3) A reliance on foreign investment.
4) Rising exports of grain which contributed to the famine of 1891.
5) Agriculture was backward, many peasants were still using wooden ploughs which limited productivity.
What were the three main social issues Russia faced in 1894?
1) Peasants were aggrieved about their living standards. The redistribution of land had resulted in a reduction of the size of plots and the mir continued to be a barrier to innovation.
2) The 1891 famine resulted in the deaths of nearly 350,000 people, its effects were long lasting.
3) Industrialisation led to urbanisation and resulting social problems such as: poor housing, lack of sanitation and inadequate water supplies. The result was the spread of diseases, especially cholera.
Who were the Liberals?
In 1904 what was founded by Pytor Struve and what were there demands?
Give three specific wants.
Westernisers continued to demand that Russia should be run similar to the Western European democracies such as Britain.
In 1904 Pytor Struve founded the Union of Liberation, which demanded greater freedoms and justice for all Russians.
In particular the Union wanted:
1) More land distribution for peasants.
2) A representative Constituent Assembly
3) Improved conditions for industrial workers
Who were the Kadets?
Who was their leader?
The Kadets were a group of intellectuals from the liberal movement, they were led by Paul Milyukov and called for a constitutional monarchy. They were the opposition within the first duma.
Who were the Octoberists?
These were a more moderate liberal group, they were loyal to the tsar but wanted changes to the system of government. They supported Nicholas II’s October Manifesto.
Who were the Populists?
The Populists were revolutionaries operating in the 1870s, who believed that agricultural communes and co-operative workshops would provide a base for the Russian economy to develop without resorting to capitalism. The Socialist Revolutionaries of the 20th century emerged from the Populist movement.
Who were the Socialist Revolutionaries?
When were they formed and who was their leader?
What were the actions of the right and left SRs.
The Socialist revolutionaries were focused on improving the living conditions of the poorest people in society, including the growing urban proletariat. It was formed in 1901, led by Victor Chernov. By 1905 there had been a split in the party, on one side were the more radical left-wing SRs and on the other side were the more moderate right-wing SRs.
The left SRs were responsible for 2000 political killings between 1901 and 1905. The left focused on the plight of industrial workers.
The right SRs worked with other parties and appealed to the peasants.
The SRs had the most support and were the biggest threat to tsarist rule prior to the 1917 October Revolution.
Who were the Social Democrats?
The Social Democrats based their ideology on the writings of Karl Marx, believing that the Proletariat could be educated to overthrow Russian autocracy by way of revolution. The Mensheviks focused on improving pay and lowering working hours of the proletariat. The Bolsheviks split from the Mensheviks; they argued that the working class could be sufficiently politically educated to create a revolution.
What was the process of Russification?
Russification was the process whereby the non-Russian regions were drawn more securely into the framework of the Russian empire. This involved administrative integration as well as the transmission of Russian culture, religion and language to the peoples of the national minorities. This was a process that started in 1863 and was continued by Lenin, Stalin and Krushchev, mainly through constitutional changes and repression.
Describe Pobedonostsev’s ideology.
He was a conservative and reactionary for most of his life. He was an advocate of autocracy and enemy of liberal democracy. He was very religious and venerated the Russian Orthodox Church. He held anti-semitic views and was behind many of the attacks on Jews that took place in this period.
What were Pobedonostsev’s four main achievements?
1) Helped to prepare judicial reforms for the tsar in 1864.
2) He became an adviser and writer on Russian law between 1868 to 1880 and published three volumes of ‘A course of civil law’.
3) He was a major influence on Alexander III’s policymaking and manifesto.
4) He became the chief prosecutor of the Holy Synod in 1880; this post enabled him to advise the tsar on religious matters and influence the church and educational and social policies.