The Romans Flashcards

1
Q

“Actually, the fact that the writers on rhetoric have presented neither their own examples nor
those of some single author, or even two, but have borrowed from all the orators and poets, is a
sign that they themselves have not believed that any one individual can be brilliant in all the
branches of style. Moreover, should any one wish to show that the art of rhetoric is of no benefit
for speaking, he might well in support employ the argument that no one man has been able to
master all the branches of rhetoric.”

A

Anonymous, Rhetorica ad Herennium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

“There are, then, three kinds of style, called types, to which discourse, if faultless, confines itself: the first we call the Grand; the second, the Middle; the third, the Simple. The Grand type consists of a smooth and ornate arrangement of impressive words. The Middle type consists of words of a lower, yet not of the lowest and most colloquial, class of words. The Simple type is brought down even to the most current idiom of standard speech.”

A

Anonymous, Rhetorica ad Herennium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

“But in striving to attain these styles, we must avoid falling into faulty styles closely akin to them. For instance, bordering on the Grand style, which is in itself praiseworthy, there is a style to be avoided. To call this the Swollen style will be correct.”

A

Anonymous, Rhetorica ad Herennium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

“I have been led by reason itself to hold this opinion first and foremost, that wisdom without eloquence does too little for the good of states, but that eloquence without wisdom is generally highly disadvantageous and is never helpful. Therefore if anyone neglects the study of philosophy and moral conduct, which is the highest and most honourable of pursuits, and devotes his whole energy to the practice of oratory, his civic life is nurtured into something useless to himself and harmful to his country.”

A

Cicero, De Inventione

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

“Therefore the material of the art of rhetoric seems to me to be that which we said Aristotle approved. The parts of it, as most authorities have stated, are Invention, Arrangement, Expression, Memory, Delivery. Invention is the discovery of valid or seemingly valid arguments to render one’s cause plausible. Arrangement is the distribution of arguments thus discovered in the proper order. Expression is the fitting of the proper language to the invented matter. . .”

A

Cicero, De Inventione

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

“And then, after considering the nature of the case, when you have found out whether it is simple or complex, and you have seen whether it discusses a written document or involves general reasoning, then you must see what the question in the case is, and the excuse or reason, the point for the judge’s decision and the foundation or supporting argument. All of these should develop out of the determination of the issue.”

A

Cicero, De Inventione

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

“What could be so wonderful as when out of an infinite crowd one human being emerges who – alone or with very few others – is able to use with effect the faculty that is a natural gift to all? Or what is so pleasing to the mind and to the ear as speech distinguished and refined by wise thoughts and impressive words? Or what so powerful and so splendid as when a single man’s speech reverses popular upheavals, the scruples of jurors, or the authority of the senate?”

A

Cicero, De Oratore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

“And in his discussions he split apart the knowledge of forming wise opinions and of speaking with distinction, two things that are, in fact, tightly linked. (His genius and his varied conversations were rendered immortal by Plato in his writings, since Socrates himself had left not a single written syllable.) This was the source of the rupture, so to speak, between the tongue and the brain, which is quite absurd, harmful, and reprehensible, and which has resulted in our having different teachers for thinking and for speaking.”

A

Cicero, De Oratore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

“In every free nation, and most of all in communities which have attained the enjoyment of peace and tranquility, this one art has always flourished above the rest and ever reigned supreme. . . . What function again is so kingly, so worthy of the free, so generous, as to bring help to the suppliant, to raise up those that are cast down, to bestow security, to set free from peril, to maintain men in their civil rights? What to is so indispensable as to have always in you grasp weapons wherewith you can defend yourself, or challenge the wicked man, or when provoked take your revenge?”

A

Cicero, De Oratore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

“For I am not going to speak of an art which I never learned, but of my own practice; and those very commonplaces, which I have set down in my notebook, are no traditions taught to me by some one or other, but such as have been used in actual affairs and at the Bar: and if they do not commend themselves to men of your consummate accomplishment, pray blame your own unfairness in seeking to learn of me things I did not know; and to extol my good nature in answering you with a good grace, won over by your enthusiasm, not my own discretion.”

A

Cicero, De Oratore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

“Now the acquisition of knowledge has three varieties: Factual inference, definition, and what I might call ‘attendance.’ For when the question is what exists in something, we investigate it by means of inference . . . The essence of a particular thing, moreover, is set out by definition . . . And ‘attendance’ is at issue when we inquire what attend qualities a particular thing has . . .”

A

Cicero, De Oratore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

“The man of eloquence whom we seek, following the suggestion of Antonius, will be one who is able to speak in court or in deliberative bodies so as to prove, to please and to sway or persuade. To prove is the first necessity, to please is charm, to sway is victory for it is the one thing of all that avails most in winning verdicts. For these three functions of the orator there are three styles, the plain style for proof, the middle style for pleasure, the vigorous style for persuasion; and in this last is summed up the entire virtue of the orator.”

A

Cicero, Orator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

“It follows that we must seek the type and pattern of each kind – a great and arduous task, as we have often said; but we should have considered what to do when we were embarking; now we must certainly spread our sails to the wind, no matter where it may carry us. First, then, we must delineate the one whom some deem to be the only true ‘Attic’ orator. He is restrained and plain, he follows the ordinary usage, really differing more than is supposed from those who are not eloquent at all. Consequently the audience, even if they are no speakers themselves, are sure they can speak in that fashion. For that plainness of style seems easy to imitate at first thought, but when attempted nothing is more difficult.”

A

Cicero, Orator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

“We have him now, Brutus, the man whom we are seeking, but in imagination, not in actual possession. . . . He in fact is eloquent who can discuss commonplace matters simply, lofty subjects impressively, and topics ranging between in a tempered style. You will say, ‘There never was such a man.’ I grant it; for I am arguing for my ideal, not what I have actually seen, and I return to that Platonic Ideal of which I had spoken; though we do not see it, still it is possible to grasp it with the mind. For it is not an eloquent person whom I seek, nor anything subject to death and decay, but that absolute quality, the possession of which makes a man eloquent.”

A

Cicero, Orator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

“Rhetoric, then, (for we shall henceforth use this term without dread of sarcastic objections,) will be best divided, in my opinion, in such a manner, that we may speak first of the art, next of the artist, and then of the work. The art will be that which ought to be attained by study, and is the knowledge how to speak well. The artificer is he who has thoroughly acquired the art, that is, the orator, whose business is to speak well.” The work is what is achieved by the artificer, that is, good speaking.

A

Quintilian, Institutes of Oratory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

“Nor do I think that founders of cities would have induced their unsettled multitudes to form themselves into communities by any other means than by the influence of the art of speaking, nor legislators, without the utmost power of oratory, have prevailed on men to bind
themselves to submit to the dominion of law. Even the very rules for the conduct of life, beautiful as they are by nature, have yet greater power in forming the mind when the radiance of eloquence illumines the beauty of the precepts.”

A

Quintilian, Institutes of Oratory

17
Q

“Since an orator, then, is a good man, and a good man cannot be conceived to exist without virtuous inclinations, and virtue, though it receives certain impulses from nature, requires notwithstanding to be brought to maturity by instruction, the orator must above all things study morality, and must obtain a thorough knowledge of all that is just and honorable, without which no one can either be a good man or an able speaker.”

A

Quintilian, Institutes of Oratory

18
Q

“There are many important elements which constitute rhetoric as an art. . . . But the most important, in my view, is that concerned with division and demonstration. By this I do not mean the division of kinds into classes, or of wholes into parts; that is another major component of rhetoric, but is not my immediate concern. The present discussion deals with the division of political questions into what are known as heads. This subject is almost identical with the theory of invention, except that it does not include all the elements of invention.”

A

Hermogenes, On Stases

19
Q

“If the matter to be judged is clear, one must next consider whether it is complete or incomplete. By ‘incomplete’ I mean that when some deficiency is supplied a description is immediately available, and the act contains no further scope for enquiry. In such a case, the issue is one of definition. The issue of definition is an enquiry into the description of an act that is partially performed and partially deficient with regard to the completeness of its description.”

A

Hermogenes, On Stases

20
Q

“All Counterpositions are divided: Presentation; definition (in some cases), with its concomitants as far as relative importance; intent; counterposition as such – whichever shares the name of the question’s issue (i.e., counterstatement, counteraccusation, transference, mitigation); alternative intent; objection; relative importance; forcible definition; thesis; second objection; counterplea; quality and intention.”

A

Hermogenes, On Stases

21
Q

“In the first place, then, I wish by this preamble to put a stop to the expectations of readers who may think that I am about to lay down rules of rhetoric such as I have learnt, and taught too, in the secular schools, and to warn them that they need not look for any such from me. Not that I think such rules of no use, but that whatever use they have is to be learnt elsewhere if any good man should happen to have leisure for learning them, he is not to ask me to teach them either in this work or any other.”

A

Augustine, On Christian Doctrine

22
Q

“. . . the work that I am speaking of ought to be undertaken by one who can argue and speak with wisdom, if not with eloquence, and with profit to his hearers. Even though he profit them less than he would if he could speak with eloquence too. But we must beware of the man who abounds in eloquent nonsense, and so much the more if the hearer is pleased with what is not worth listening to, and thinks that because the speaker is eloquent what he says must be true.”

A

Augustine, On Christian Doctrine

23
Q

“Accordingly, a great orator has truly said that ‘an eloquent man must speak so as to teach, to delight, and to persuade.’ Then he adds: ‘To teach is a necessity, to delight is a beauty, to persuade is a triumph.’ Now of these three, the one first mentioned, the teaching, which is a matter of necessity, depends on what we say; the other two on the way we say it. He, then, who speaks with the purpose of teaching should not suppose that he has said what he has to say as long as he is not understood; for although what he has said be intelligible to himself, it is not said at all to the man who does not understand it. If, however, he is understood, he has said his say, whatever may have been his manner of saying it.”

A

Augustine, On Christian Doctrine