The Role Of The State In The Macroeconomy Flashcards
Tell me about the key elements of public finance
The three main components are public expenditure, taxation and public sector borrowing
Tell me the aspects of public finance: public expenditure
Current expenditure, capital expenditure, transfer payments
Tell me the aspects of public finance: taxation
Direct and indirect
Tell me about the aspect of public finance: public sector borrowing
Fiscal (budget deficit)
National debt
Expenditure by central and local government can be categorised into 3 distinct types:
Capital expenditure, current expenditure and transfer payments
What does capital expenditure relate to
This relates to expenditure on long term investment projects such as new hospitals and roads. It is often referred to as public sector investment.
What’s the objective of public expenditure
The objectives of public expenditure include the provision of public goods; defence and internal security; the provision of goods and services which yield external benefits and/or where there may be information gaps and asymmetric information, eg health and education; the redistribution of income; and expenditure to deal with external costs such as pollution and waste.
What’s current expenditure
This is day to day expenditure on goods and services, eg salaries of teachers and nurses and drugs used by the NHS.
What are transfer payments
These are payments made by the state (from tax revenues) to individuals in the form of benefits for which there is no production in return. Examples include child benefit, state pensions and the Jobseeker’s Allowance.
Transfer payments involve redistribution of income. Therefore they are not relevant to the calculation of a country’s national income.
What are the factors influencing the size and pattern of public expenditure:
The level of GDP
The size and age distribution of the population
Political priorities
Redistribution of income
Discretionary fiscal policy
Debt interest
Tell me about the reason for the changing size and composition of public expenditure: the level of GDP
As income increases, so do expectations, and the demand for many government-provided services such as health and education rises more than proportionately because demand for them is income elastic.
Tell me about the reason for the changing size and composition of public expenditure: the size and age distribution of the population
An increase in the size of the population (eg through immigrations) is likely to place extra pressure on public services, while an ageing population will increase demand for medical services and social services for the elderly.
Tell me about the reason for the changing size and composition of public expenditure: political priorities
A government in a developed country might place particular emphasis on improving the quality of health and education services, whereas the priority of a government in a developing country may be to improve infrastructure.
Tell me about the reason for the changing size and composition of public expenditure: redistribution of income
Expenditure on those in relative poverty and on those with disabilities increased significantly in many countries before the 2008 financial crisis. However, subsequent austerity measures aimed at reducing fiscal deficits have led to cuts in means tested benefits such as tax credits and housing benefits, resulting in an increase in relative poverty.
Tell me about the reason for the changing size and composition of public expenditure: discretionary fiscal policy
The 2008 financial crisis led to the resurrection of fiscal policy as a means of macroeconomic management in many countries, although often only temporarily.
Tell me about the reason for the changing size and composition of public expenditure: debt interest
The massive increase in fiscal deficits from 2008 is leading to sharp rises in national debts in many countries. For example, Greece’s national debt as a proportion of GDP increased from over 125% in 2009 to 180% in 2015. In turn, this results in higher interest payments so that less money is available for public services.
What may affect the significance of differing levels of public expenditure as a proportion of GDP
Productivity and growth
Living standards
Crowding out
Level of taxation
Equality
How could productivity and growth be affected by the differing levels of public expenditure as a proportion of GDP, what would result from this?
Public expenditure on areas such as education, infrastructure and health might cause an increase in productivity and so result in a rightward shift in long run aggregate supply curve.
An increase in public expenditure will also cause an increase in aggregate demand because it represents an injection into the circular flow and so will have a multiplier effect on GDP. Therefore, higher public expenditure would cause an increase in economic growth.
How could living standards be affected by the differing levels of public expenditure as a proportion of GDP, what would result from this?
Higher public expenditure as a proportion of GDP could result in an increase in living standards if, for example, much of it went to the improvement of public services such as health and education, or to housing and infrastructure. However, this would not necessarily be the case if most went on defence or on interest payments on the national debt.
How could crowding out be affected by the differing levels of public expenditure as a proportion of GDP, what would result from this?
Increased public expenditure could cause crowding out. This might take two forms: resource and financial
What’s resource crowding out
Resource crowding out occurs when the economy is operating at full employment and an increase in public expenditure results in insufficient resources being available for the private sector.
What’s financial crowding out
Financial crowding out occurs when increased public expenditure or tax cuts are financed by increased public sector borrowing, so increasing the demand for loanable funds and driving up interest rates.
How could the level of taxation be affected by the differing levels of public expenditure as a proportion of GDP, what would result from this?
Countries which have relatively low public expenditure as a proportion of GDP may also have relatively low levels of taxation. Some economists consider that this is desirable on the basis that the state is less efficient at allocating resources than the free market; that it gives consumers more choice in spending decisions; and that growth tends to be higher in countries in which public expenditure does not rise above 35% of GDP. However, Scandinavian countries have high living standards despite public expenditure being a relatively high proportion of GDP.
How could equality be affected by the differing levels of public expenditure as a proportion of GDP, what would result from this?
The impact of different levels of public expenditure on equality will also depend on the composition of that public expenditure. In countries in which public expenditure is weighted towards means tested benefits, social housing, education, health and subsidies on basic food items, income distribution is likely to be more evenly distributed than in countries where public expenditure is weighted more to defence, universal benefits and prestigious investment projects.
What are the three broad categories of tax
Progressive, proportional and regressive.
What’s progressive tax
This is a tax in which the proportion of income paid in tax rises as income increases. Therefore, there are likely to be several tax bands, eg 10%, 20% and 45%, so that as income increases beyond a certain limit any further income is taxed at a higher tax rate.
What’s proportional tax
This is a tax in which the proportion of income paid in tax remains constant as income increases. For example, some countries eg Latvia, Estonia and Hong Kong have a flat rate of income tax.
What are regressive taxes
This is a tax in which the proportion of income paid in tax falls as income increases. Although governments do not deliberately set regressive taxes, some taxes have a regressive effect, most typically those on expenditure.
What do direct taxes tax
Income and wealth
What do indirect taxes tax
Expenditure
For direct taxes, where does the incidence of the tax fall, ie, who bears the final burden of paying the tax?
A direct tax is paid by a person on whom it is legally imposed. Therefore, the burden of the tax cannot be shifted to any other person.
For indirect taxes, where does the incidence of the tax fall, I.e who bears the final burden of paying the tax
The burden of an indirect tax may be shifted in whole or in part from the person on whom it is imposed to a third party. For example, a business may be legally responsible for paying VAT but part or all of the burden may be passed on to consumers.
Tell me examples of direct taxes
Income tax, capital gains tax, corporation tax
Tell me examples of indirect taxes
Value added tax, excise duties, tariffs.
List me the economic effects of changes in tax rates (indirect and direct)
Incentives to work
Tax revenues
Income distribution
Real output and employment
The price level
The trade balance
FDI flows
Tell me how changes in direct tax rates would effect: incentives to work
An increase in tax rates might have significant disincentive effects. For example, if the basic rate of income tax were raised, there would be less incentive for the unemployed or those not currently participating in the workforce to accept jobs. Similarly, if the higher rate of tax were increased, then people might be less willing to do overtime and more inclined to reduce their working hours, retire early or not seek promotion.
Tell me how changes in direct tax rates would effect: tax revenues
Some economists consider that, if tax rates are increased too much, tax revenues may actually fall because the disincentives to work are so great. If the higher rate of income tax is increased, then there is likely to be an increase in tax avoidance (legal) and tax evasion (illegal) and a rise in the number of tax exiles. The Laffer curve shows this effect.
What does the Laffer curve look like
Tax revenue on y axis Tax rate (% ) on x axis
It’s like an n shape
If tax rates increase too much tax revenues will start to fall.
Tell me how changes in direct tax rates would effect: income distribution
Most countries have a progressive income tax system so that the proportion of income paid in tax increases as income increases. Consequently, income tax makes income distribution more equitable.
Tell me how changes in direct tax rates would effect: real output and employment
An increase in income tax rates would cause a fall in disposable income. In turn, this would cause a reduction in consumption and, therefore, a fall in aggregate demand. It may also be argued that the disincentive effects of higher income tax would cause a leftward shift in the aggregate supply curve. Both of these would, therefore, cause a fall in real output and an increase in unemployment.
An increase in income tax rates would cause a fall in disposable income. In turn, this would cause a decrease in consumption and, therefore, in aggregate demand. Consequently, the aggregate demand curve would shift to the left and real output would fall. The disincentive effect of higher income tax rates could cause the aggregate supply curve to shift to the left, so real output would ultimately decrease.
^ can be explained either way
Tell me how changes in direct tax rates would effect: the price level
The fall in aggregate demand (described before) would tend to depress the price level, although this may be offset slightly by a leftward shift in the aggregate supply curve resulting from an increased disincentive to work.
Tell me how changes in direct tax rates would effect: the trade balance
An increase in income tax rates would cause a fall in disposable income. In turn, this would cause a reduction in consumption and, therefore, a fall in imports. This would result in an improvement in the trade balance.