The Role Of The State In The Macroeconomy- Theme 4 Flashcards
What is capital expenditure?
This relates expenditure on long-term investment projects such as new hospital and roads. It’s often referred to as a public sector.
What are the objectives of public expenditure?
- provision of public goods
- defence and internal security
- provision of goods and and services which yield external benefits and/or where there may be information gaps and asymmetric information
- redistribution of income
- expenditure to deal with external costs such as pollution and waste
What is current expenditure?
This is day-to-day expenditure on goods and services eg salaries for teachers
What are transfer payments?
These are payments made by the state to individuals in form of benefits for which there is no production in return. Examples include child benefit, state pensions and the job seeker’s allowance.
How is the level of GDP a reason for the changing size and composition of public expenditure?
As income increases, so do expectations, and the demand for many government-provided services such as health and education rises more than proportionately because demand for them is income elastic.
How is the size and age distribution of the population a reason for the changing size and composition of public expenditure?
An increase in size of population is likely to place extra pressure on public services, while an ageing population will increase demand for medical services and social services for the elderly.
How are political priorities a reason for the changing size and composition of public expenditure?
A government in a developed country might place particular emphasis on improving the quality of health and education services, whereas the priority of a government in a developing country may be to improve infrastructure.
How is the redistribution of income a reason for the changing size and composition of public expenditure?
Expenditure on those in relative poverty and on those with disabilities increased significantly in many countries before 2008 financial crisis. However, subsequent austerity measures aimed at reducing fiscal deficits have led to cuts in means-tested benefits such as tax credits and housing benefits, resulting in an increase in relative poverty.
How is discretionary fiscal policy a reason for the changing size and composition of public expenditure?
2008 financial crisis led to resurrection of fiscal policy as a means of macroeconomic management in many countries, although often only temporarily.
How is debt interest a reason for the changing size and composition of public expenditure?
The massive increase in fiscal deficits from 2008 is leading to sharp rises in national debts in many countries. In turn this results in higher interest payments so that less money available for public services.
What is the significance of differing levels of public expenditure as a proportion of GDP on productivity and growth?
Public expenditure on areas such as education, infrastructure and health might cause increase in productivity and so result in rightward shift in long-run aggregate supply curve.
Increase in public spending use also cause increase in AD because it represents injection into circular flow and so will have multiplier effect on GDP. Therefore, higher public expenditure cause increase in economic growth.
What is the significance of differing levels of public expenditure as a proportion of GDP on living standards?
Higher public expenditure as a proportion of GDP could result in an increase in living standards if, for example, much of it went to improvement of public services such as health and education, or to housing and infrastructure. However, this wouldn’t necessarily be the case if most went on defence or on interest payments on the national debt.
What is the significance of differing levels of public expenditure as a proportion of GDP on resource crowding out?
Resource crowding out occurs when the economy is operating at full employment and an increase in public expenditure results in insufficient resources being available for the private sector
What is the significance of differing levels of public expenditure as a proportion of GDP on financial crowding out?
Financial crowding out occurs when increased public expenditure or tax cuts are financed by increased public sector borrowing, so increasing the demand for loanable funds and driving up interest rates.
What is the significance of differing levels of public expenditure as a proportion of GDP on the level of taxation?
Countries which have relatively low public expenditure as a proportion of GDP may also have relatively low levels of taxation. Some economists consider that this is desirable on basis that the state is less efficient at allocating resources than the free market; that it gives consumer more choice in spending decisions; and that growth tends to be higher in countries in which public expenditure doesn’t rise above 35% of GDP.
What is the significance of differing levels of public expenditure as a proportion of GDP on equality?
In countries in which public expenditure is weighted towards means-tested benefits, social housing, education, health and subsidies on basic food items, income distribution likely to be more evenly distributed than in countries where public expenditure is weighted more to defence, universal benefits and prestigious investment projects.
Define progressive tax.
A tax in which the proportion of income paid in tax rises as income increases. Therefore, there are likely to be several tax bands eg. 10%, 20% and 45%, so that as income increases beyond a certain limit any further income is taxed at a higher tax rate.
Define proportional tax.
A tax in which the proportion of income laid in tax remains constant as income increases. For example some countries have a flat rate of income tax.
Define regressive tax.
A tax in which the proportion of income paid in tax falls a income increases. Although governments don’t deliberately set regressive taxes, some taxes have a regressive effect, most typically those on expenditure.
What are the economic effects of changes in direct tax rates on incentives to work?
Increase in tax rates might have significant disincentive effects. For example, if basic rate of income tax were raised, there would be less incentive for the unemployed or those not currently participating in workforce to accept jobs. If higher rate of tax were increased, then people might be less willing to do overtime and more inclined to reduce their working hours, retire early or not seek promotion.
What are the economic effects of changes in direct tax rates on tax revenues ?
Some economists consider that, if tax rates are increased too much, tax revenues may actually fall because the disincentives to work are so great. If higher rate of income tax increased, then there’s likely to be increase in tax avoidance and tax evasion and a rise in number of tax exiles. The laffer curve shows that, if the marginal tax rate is T then tax revenues will be maximised. However, increase in marginal tax rate to V will result in reduction in tax revenues from R to S.
What are the economic effects of changes in direct tax rates on income distribution?
Most countries have a progressive income tax system. Consequently, income tax makes income distribution more equitable.
What are the economic effects of changes in direct tax rates on real output and employment?
Increase in income tax rates would cause fall in disposable income. In turn, this would cause a reduction in consumption and, therefore, fall in AD. May also be argued that the disincentive effects of higher income tax would cause leftwards shift in AS curve. Both of theses would, therefore, cause fall in real output and increase in unemployment.
What are the economic effects of changes in direct tax rates on the price level?
Fall in AD would tend to depress price level, although this may be offset slightly by a leftward shift in the AS curve resulting from an increased disincentive to work.