the remembering brain - part 2 Flashcards
What is STM?
memory for info currently ‘in mind’ - limited capacity
What is LTM?
stored info that need don’t need to be presently accessed or consciously accessible
unlimited capacity
When is info in the LMT and when is it in the STM?
all info from minutes, hours, days ago in LTM
information which is presently brought to mind (cued) is moved from the LTM to the STM to be accessed. It is then (re)consolidated and stored
How does WM and STM differ?
STM - passive store used for maintenance
WM - info currently being manipulated, used for higher processes and various complex functions
What functions are supported by the WM?
active manipulation of info for high cognitive functions e.g reading
underlies execution of complex behaviour regardless of cognitive domains which are being engaged
What happens when WM fails?
the ability to carry out daily activities is impaired
How does working memory support complex activities e.g social situations?
Gathers sensory info from the environment
Retrieves schemas in LTM
This info stays active in WM and dictates how you behave
Outline Baddeley and Hitch’s WMM
Separate STM sores and executive system for manipulating and controlling info in stores
Slave systems - visuospatial sketchpad, episodic buffer, phonological loop, controlled by central executive
What is the episodic buffer?
Added later
Temporary store of info brought to mind from LTM when needed
Outline alternative arguments to the WMM
argue against separate STM stores
instead working memory is activity in LTM
Outline the structures of the phonological loop
Phonological store
Rehearsal mechanisms
Outline evidence for the existence of the phonological store.
Paulesu PET study
-STM memory for letters- store and rehearsal components
-and rhyming of letters- rehearsal system only
What are the neural correlates of the phonological loop? (Paulesu PET study)
Phonological loop = left supermarginal gyrus
Rehearsal system - Broca’s area (B44)
Outline Ranganath’s study into the visuospatial sketchpad.
Study by Ranganath et al., (2004) explored visual WM maintenance and long-term associative retrieval
Prescan – ppt shown either a face, a building, or a face and a building together
C1 – delayed matching to sample
* Aimed to test WM
* Ppt shown face or building , then 7s delay, then shown a face/building, had to say if it was a ‘match’ or ‘no match’ to the original face
C2 – delayed pairs associate
* Control aimed to test LTM
* Ppt shown a building, then 7s delay, then a face, had to say if it was a ‘match’ or ‘no match’ to the pair in the prescan
What were the results of Ranganath’s study into the visuospatial sketchpad?
Results for DMS trails
* Fusiform Face Area (face sensitive) activated on face trials
* Parahippocampal place area (place sensitive) activate on building trials
* Even in delay, activity in these areas remained above baseline activity = retain the knowledge/ maintaining single object in STM involves activating ventral stream representations
* Good performance on these tasks - frontal and parietal lobes activated during the delay period = these regions are functionally connected to frontal and parietal regions and involved in WM