The relationship between religious beliefs, social change and stability Flashcards
Functionalist theories see religion as…
a force for stability rather than change. It reinforces value consensus, it strengthens social solidarity, it deals with life crises which threaten to disrupt society. As such, religion is see as a conservative force which maintains the status quo
Durkheim
According to Durkheim, religion reinforces the collective conscience- the norms and values of society. Religious rituals strengthen solidarity by binding together members of society. In these respects, religion is a force for stability rather than change.
Malinoski
According to Malinowski, religion serves to reduce the anxiety and tension which results from events which threaten to disrupt social life. Such events include life crises, such as puberty, marriage and death
Parsons
Like Durkheim, Parsons sees religion as reinforcing value consensus- for example, the ten commandments support the norms and values of western countries. He also sees religion as giving meaning to and making sense of life. This helps people to adjust to and accept their situation which, in turn, promotes social stability. Therefore, the emphasis is stability rather than change.
Feminists see religion as…
a conservative force. Where Marxists have seen religion as maintaining the power of the ruling class, feminists have seen it as maintaining patriarchy- the domination of women by men
Christianity provides evidence to support this view…
- The Christian God- ‘our father’- has traditionally been seen as male
- Eve was created as a helpmate for Adam
- Christianity traditionally defined a wife as the property of her husband and she owed him long life obedience
Marxist see religion as…
a conservative force. According to Karl Marx, it justifies the dominance of the ruling class and provides consolation for the subject class. As a result, religion discourages social change.
‘Religion legitimates the ruling class’
Religion often legitimates the position of the ruling class. For example, monarchs in Medieval Europe ruled by divine right. How can human beings change what is ordained by God?
‘Religion is the Opium of the People’
According to Marx, religion is the ‘opium of the people’. It provides consolation for the misery of oppression by offering the false promise of eternal happiness in the next life. The illusion of happiness makes life appear bearable and therefore discourages attempts by the subject class to change their situation. Again, religion acts as a conservative force which maintains things the way they are.
Friedrich Engels
Marx’s friend and cowriter Friedrich Engels saw glimmers of a demand for change in some religious movements which looked forward to change in the here and now rather than in the after life. For example, he saw aspects of communism in Early Christianity. However, because of religion’s emphasis on the supernatural, Engels felt that these movements were doomed to failure- they would not lead to political revolution.
Neo Marxists see religion as…
part of the superstructure of society, shaped by the infrastructure: the economic base. Like traditional Marxism, Neo Marxism suggests that religion can have a conservative force which maintains patriarchy. However, religion can also have a force for change, by encouraging proletariat action.
Gramsci
is interested in how the ruling class maintain their control over society through the use of ideas rather than simply through coercion. Gramsci rejects the traditional Marxist view that the cultural superstructure merely reflected society’s economic base. Gramsci argues that hegemonic control isn’t inevitable- and the Catholic church could be used instead for theoretical guidance to inspire a revolt
Maduro
believes that religion can be a revolutionary force that brings about change. Social liberation can be achieved if significant change occurs in the church. This change can occur if the oppressed, finding that all forms of protest are blocked by the central power, take their discontent to the churches, where their anguish may be voiced by the clergy.
Liberation theology definition
a movement that emerged within the Catholic Church in Latin America at the end of the 1960s, with a strong commitment to the poor and opposition to military dictatorships. Liberation theology was a major change of direction for the Catholic church since for centuries, it had been an extremely conservative institution.
Factors that led to the emergence of the liberation thesis
- Deepening rural poverty and the growth of urban slums throughout Latin America
- Human rights abuses following military take-overs, such as false imprisonment, torture and death squads murdering political opponents
- The growing commitment among Catholic priests to an ideology that supported the poor and opposed human rights violations
‘praxis’
(means practical action guided by theory) Unlike traditional Catholicism, which supported the status quo, liberation theology set out to change society by praxis. e.g. priests helped the poor establish support groups and took the lead in developing literacy programmes