The Organization of International Business Flashcards
What does the term organizational architecture include?
Formal organizational structure Control systems and incentives Processes Organizational culture People
Explain formal organizational structure
a. The formal division of the organization into subunits (product divisions, national operations, and functions. Often this is displayed in an organizational chart.
b. The location of decision-making responsibilities within that structure (i.e., centralized or decentralized)
c. The establishment of integrating mechanisms to coordinate the activities of subunits, including cross-functional teams and pan-regional committees.
Explain control systems and incentives
a. Control systems are the metrics used to measure the performance of subunits and make judgments about how well managers are running those subunits.
b. Incentives are the devices used to reward appropriate managerial behavior.
Explain processes
are the way decisions are made and work is performed within the organization.
Explain organizational culture
refers to the norms and value systems that are shared among the employees of an organization.
Explain people (in the context of organizational architecture)
doesn’t only include the employees of the organization, but also the HR-strategy used to recruit, compensate, and retain those individuals.
Vertical differentiation
refers to the location of decision-making responsibilities within a structure.
- Generally, overall firm strategy, legal issues, etc. is left to top-management, and operating decisions may or may not be decentralized.
Give some arguments for centralization
- Can facilitate coordination and integration of operations.
- Can help ensure that decisions are consistent with organizational objectives- Minimizing the chance of decisions that are at variance with top management’s goals.
- By concentrating power and authority in one individual management team, can give top-level managers the means to bring about needed major organizational change.
- Avoid duplication of activities that occurs when similar activities are carried on by various subunits within the organization.
Give some arguments for decentralization
- Top management can become overburned when decision-making authority is centralized -> poor decisions
- Motivational research favors decentralization -> willing to give more to their jobs when they have a greater degree of individual freedom and control.
- Decentralization permits greater flexibility – more rapid response to environmental changes
- Can result in better decisions -> decisions are made closer to the spot by individuals who have better information than managers.
- Can increase control. Subunit managers can be held responsible for subunit performance - > fewer excuses for poor performance.
Rational decision making
Whenever a manager makes a decision, we assume that he can make the right decision at the right time (rational decision making).
What does Herbert Sion say?
- Challenges the above (rational decision making) by saying that we cannot assume that managers have the rationale (right information) to make right decisions at all times.
- Instead we are bounded, not fully rational
Suboptimal decisions
o We want to satisfy our peers/bosses, and not always do what’s best.
o The way we make decisions is often by deciding, and then looking at problems, rather than making a decision based on analysis of the problem.
o We step away from complexity and try to simplify problems.
Horizontal differentiation
refers to the formal division of the organization into subunits. The decision is normally made based on function, type of business, or geographic area.
The structure of domestic firms
- Often, as firms grow, the organization is split into functions (marketing, sales, etc.).
o These functions are most often coordinated and controlled by top management. - This is difficult, when the firm diversifies its product offering, which takes the firm into different business areas.
o At this stage most firms switch to a product divisional structure (each division is responsible for a distinct product line/business area)
The international division
When firms initially expand abroad, they often group all their international activities into an international division, organized on geography.
- This means replicating the functional structure in every country for firms organized based on functions and for firms organized by product divisions it means replicating the divisional structure in every country.
- However, an international division structure can give rise to problems:
o The dual structure means potential for conflict and coordination problems between domestic and foreign operations.
- As a result of such problems, many firms that continue to expand internationally abandon this structure and adopt one of the worldwide structures:
Worldwide area structure
Divides the world into geographic areas which are largely autonomous, and thus, decisions are decentralized to the areas.
- Favored by firms w. low diversification (of products) and with functional structure.
- Difficult to transfer core competencies between areas.
- More appropriate if the firm is pursuing a localization strategy
Worldwide Product Divisional Structure
Spreads into the geographic areas by divisions that follow the, where each division is a self-contained entity with full responsibility for its own value creation activities.
- However, each product division is coordinated by that division worldwide, meaning that the voice of area managers is limited since they are under product division managers.
- Easy to transfer core competencies between areas.
- More appropriate for firms pursuing global standardization or international strategies
Global Matrix structure
In the classic global matrix structure, horizontal differentiation proceeds along two dimensions: product division and geographic area (dual responsibility)
- Individual managers thus belong to two hierarchies (a divisional hierarchy and an area hierarchy) and have two bosses (a divisional boss and an area boss).
o This makes it ineffective and too bureaucratic to work in practice.
What are integrating mechanisms?
Mechanisms for coordinating subunits
- The need for coordination between subunits varies with the strategy of the firm. It’s most needed in international firms pursuing location and experience curve economies, local responsiveness, and the transfer core competencies and skills between subunits.
Formal integrating mechanisms
Direct contact – managers of subunits contact each other when they have common concerns
Liaison roles – giving a person in each subunit the responsibility for coordinating with another subunit
Teams – composed of individuals from subunits to coordinate product development and introduction -> useful in any aspect of operations or strategy
Matrix structure – all roles are viewed as integrating roles. Facilitate maximum integration among subunits.
Informal integrating mechanism
Knowledge network – transmitting information within an organization based on informal contact between managers within and enterprise.
The figure shows how managers are linked through common acquaintances
Knowledge networks may not be efficient enough in itself to achieve coordination.
The great strength of such a network is that it can be used as a nonbureaucratic conduit for knowledge flows within a multinational enterprise
- Needs many managers in the network to work
- Establishing companywide knowledge networks is difficult
o Two techniques being used to establish networks are information (IT) systems and management development policies.
- To work, firms must have a strong organizational culture that promotes teamwork and cooperation.
Distance
makes integration of companies complicated, read about CAGE framework
What are some control systems?
Personal controls, bureaucratic controls, output controls, and cultural controls.
Personal controls
Personal contact with subunits – mostly used in small firms
Achieved by personal contact between top management and subordinate managers
Bureaucratic controls
A system of rules and procedures that directs the actions of subunits (e.g. capital spending rules)