the nature-nurture debate Flashcards
nature
refers to inherited influences or heredity
all human characteristics are innate
psychological characteristics like intelligence and personality are determined by biological factors such as genes
nurture
influence of experience and the environment
empiricist
argued that the mind is a blank slate at birth which is then shaped by the environment
this view later becomes an important feature in the behaviourist approach
prenatal factors such as how physical influences such as smoking or psychological influences such as music affect the foetus
more generally development is inflicted postnatlly in terms of the social conditions a child grows up in
measuring nature and nurture
the edegree in which two people are similar on a particular trait can be represented by a correlation coefficient is called concordance
such concordance provides an estimate about the extent to which a trait is inherited - heritability
heritability is the proportion of differences between individuals in a population with regards to particular trait that’s is due to genetic variation
a figure of 0.1 or 1% means genes contribute almost nothing to individual diffences
1.0 or 100% means ghent’s are th only reason for individual differences
general figure for heribatiloty in IQ is about .5 across multiple studies carrying populations
means about half of a person intelligence is determined by genetic factors and the other half must be environmental
the nature of- nurture debate - interactions it approach
not really a debate about one or the other because any behaviour/character is it arises from a combination of both
example - Bowlby claimed that a baby’s attachment type is determined by the warmth and continuity of parental love (environmental influence)
Kagan proposed that a baby’s innate personality (temperament) also affects the attachment relationship
thus nature (the child’s temperament) in a real sense creates nurture (the parents reasoned) so environment and hereditary interact
for this reason psuchoogicts are now more likely to ask what the relative contribution of each influence is
the nature-nurture debate is really about discussion how nature and nurture interact - interactions it approach
diathesis - stress model
suggest behaviour is caused by a biological or environmental vulnerability (diathesis) which is only expressed when coupled with a biological or environmental trigger (stressor)
exmaple - biological exaplantions of OCS
a perosn who inherits a genetic vulnerability for OCD may not develop the disorder
but combined with a psychological trigger (traumatic experience) this amy result in the dirosder appearing
epigentics
refers to a change in our genetic activity without changing the genes themselves
it is a process that happens throughout life and is caused by interaction with he environment
aspects of out lifestyle or events we encounter (from smoking and diet to trauma) leave marks on out DNA / genes
which switch genes on or off
this explains why factors such as smiling have a lifelong influence even after you actually stop - they have changed the way your genes will be expressed
epigenetic chnges may go on and influence of the genetic codes of our children as well as their children
epigentics therefore introduces a third element to the nature-nurture debate the life experience of previous generations
strength
adoption studies
strength of research into the nature-nirtree debate is the used of adoption studies
adoption studies are useful because they separate the competing influences of nature and nurture
if adopted children are found to be more similar to their adoptive parents this suggests the environment is the bigger influence
whereas if adopted are more similar to whir biological parents then genetic factors are presumed to dominate
A meta-analysis of adoptions studies by Rhee and Walkman found that genetic influences accounted for 41% of the variance in aggression
shows how research can separate the influences of nature and nurture
strenght
epigentics
of the debate is support for epigentics
example of how the environmental effects can span generatopns presumably through epigentics effects comes from events of the second world war
in 1944 the nazis blocked the distribution og food to the dutch people and 22000 died of starvation
Susser and Lin reported that women who became pro gang during the famine went on to have low birth weigh babies
these babies were twice as likely to develop schizophrenia when they grew up compared to more typical population rates
suuports the view that the life experiences of previous gernations can leave epigentics markers that influence the health of their offspring
strength
real world application
research suggest that OCD is highly heritable mental disorder
such understanding can inform genetic counselling because it is importnat to understand that height heritability doe snot mean it is inevitable that the indivusal will go on to develop the disorder
means that elle who have a hugh genetic risk of OCD because of their family background can receive advice about the likelihood of developing the disorder and how they might prevent this
shows that debate is not just a theorietical one but that it is importnat as ta practical level to understand the interaction between nature and nurture