the nature-nurture debate Flashcards
1
Q
the interactionist approach
A
- the NN debate seeks to find whether behaviour is more influenced by nature or nurture
- not really a debate as any characteristic arises from both
- historically, we thought nature and nurture worked in isolation
- for example, Bowlby claimed that attachment type is determined by warmth and continuity of parental love, whereas Kagan proposed that innate personality also affects attachment (environment and heredity interact)
- debate is really about how nature and nurture interact (interactionist)
- constructivist approach (nature creates nurture)
2
Q
diathesis-stress model
A
- suggests behaviour is caused by biological or environmental vulnerability, which is only expressed when coupled with a biological or environmental trigger (stressor)
- diathesis is biological component
- for example, someone who inherits a genetic vulnerability for OCD may not develop the disorder, but when coupled with a psychological trigger, the disorder may appear
- diathesis does not have to be a genetic basis, could be caused by severe trauma in childhood which would affect the developing brain
3
Q
epigenetics
A
- a change in our genetic activity without changing the genes themselves
- happens throughout life and is caused by interactions with the environment
- aspects of our lifestyle or events we encounter (such as smoking or trauma) leave marks on our DNA, which switch genes on or off
- explains why factors such as smoking have a lifelong influence even after you stop, they have changed the ways your genes are expressed
- these epigenetic changes may go on and influence the genetic codes of our children, as well as their children (transgenerational process)
- therefore introduces a third factor into the NN debate - the life experience of previous generations
- interactionist approach, environment influencing how dna works
4
Q
constructivism
A
- we construct our environment based on nurture
- people select, modify and create environments correlated with genetic disposition
- what appears to be an environmental influence (nurture) may actually be a genetic influence (nature)
- for example, a child who is genetically predisposed to be a competent reader is likely to seek out opportunities to practice this and reinforce this because it is rewarding
- innate tendencies drive us to do a certain behaviour
- the MAOA gene is linked with violence, these people might seek out people and environments that reward this (eg. sports such as rugby)
5
Q
key concepts - nature
A
- refers to inherited factors, or heredity
- nativists such as Rene Descartes argued that all aspects of human behaviour are innate
- physical and behavioural characteristics that are displayed (phenotype) are inherited in the human genome (genotype)
- influenced by chemicals such as hormones and neurotransmitters
6
Q
key concepts - nurture
A
- refers to the influence of experience and the environment
- interactions with the environment
- empiricists such as John Locke argued that the mind is a blank slate at birth which is then shaped by the environment (important feature of behaviourist approach)
- Richard Lerner identified different levels of the environment, including prenatal factors such as how physical or psychological influences affect the foetus
7
Q
key concepts - measuring nature and nurture
A
- the degree to which two people are similar on a particular trait can be represented by a correlation coefficient (concordance)
- this provides an estimate to the extent at which the trait is inherited (heritability)
- this is the proportion of differences between individuals in a population that is due to genetic variation
8
Q
evaluation - adoption studies
A
- adoption studies separate the competing influences of nature and nurture
- if adopted children are found to be more similar to their adoptive parents, this suggests the environment has bigger influence
- if adopted children are found to be more similar to their biological parents, this suggests that genetic factors have bigger influence
- a meta-analysis by Rhee and Walkman found that genetic influences account for 41% of the variance in aggression
9
Q
evaluation - epigenetics
A
- an example of how environmental effects can span generations through epigenetic effects comes from the second world war
- the nazis blocked the distribution of food to the dutch, Susser and Lin found that women who became pregnant during this famine went on to have low birth weight babies
- these babies were twice as likely to develop schizophrenia when they grew up
- supports that life experiences of past generations can leave epigenetic markers that influence offspring
- also support from Dias and Ressler who gave electric shocks to male rats when they smelt acetophenone, showed fear response and so did children and subsequent children
10
Q
evaluation - real-world application
A
- research shows that OCD is a highly heritable mental disorder
- this understanding can inform genetic counselling, high heritability doesn’t mean it is inevitable that the individual will develop the disorder
- people who have a high genetic risk of OCD can receive advice about the likelihood of developing the disorder and how they may prevent this
- debate is also important at a practical level
11
Q
evaluation - twin studies
A
- nestadt study on ocd
- concordance rates were 68% for mz and 31% for dz, higher for mz so supports nature
- if it was just nature, rates would be 100% for mz so there must be some influence from environment too, refutes nature
- the 32% of mz who didnt develop ocd perhaps had different life experiences and were not exposed to the trigger (diathesis-stress model)
12
Q
evaluation - epigenetic determinism
A
- hard determinism
- not much free will, choice of environment based off of innate tendencies
- biological determinism, we have no control over genetic makeup
- environmental determinism, we have no control over the influences of our parents and grandparents
13
Q
evaluation - being able to isolate nature / nurture
A
- we can develop treatments / interventions / preventions to help people and society
- for example, nature and understanding the involvement of serotonin in OCD, development of SSRIs
- for example, nurture and understanding conditioning in aquisition of phobias, development of treatments like SD and flooding
- identification of candidate genes, genetic counselling to help people understand their level of risk and to be aware of how to prevent the certain behaviour being triggered