The Nature and Sources of the British Constitution Flashcards

1
Q

Features of a codified constitution

A
  • The fundamental rules that govern the operation of a state are set out in a single authoritative document.
  • It is entrenched with special procedures for its amendment, such as the requirement of a supermajority far in excess of 50% or a popular referendum.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Examples of codified constitutions

A
  • The US Constitution written in 1789 after the American War of Independence. Has been amended 27 times since 1791.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

features of uncodified constitutions

A
  • The rules and principles that govern the state have evolved over time and are found in a number of different places
  • Some of the constitutional principles of a state are written in common law; others are found in statute law or ‘conventions’.
  • Constitutional laws have the same authority as regular statute law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The example of an uncodified constitution

A

The British Constitution is based upon a number of important historical documents such as Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights and the Act of Settlement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Magna Carta (1215)

A
  • First formal attempt to try to limit the powers of the monarch (place him under the rule of law).
  • Said that everyone had right to a fair trial.
  • However, this didn’t apply to peasants.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Bill of Rights (1689)

A
  • Frequent Parliaments, free elections and parliamentary privilege
  • No taxation without parliament’s agreement
  • However, still didn’t cover rights of ordinary men and parliament was composed of wealthy male landowners.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Act of Settlement 1701

A
  • Looked to ensure a Protestant succession to the throne.
  • This meant parliament was calling the shots, not the monarch.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a constitution?

A
  • A set of laws which are used to govern a country
  • It also sets out the relationship between the state, the citizens and the judiciary.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Royal Prerogative

A
  • The formal powers of the monarch that are exercised on their behalf by the PM and the govt.
  • Appointing ministers, making international treaties and calling general elections all lie with the executive and not the legislature, without parliament’s approval.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Statute Law

A
  • Law derived from Acts of Parliament and subordinate legislation.
    E.g. Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949, the latter of which means the Lords can only delay bills by a year
    E.g. The EU Act 2020 enforced the exit of the UK from the EU, and so their laws no longer played a role in Uk constitution.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Common Law

A
  • Law derived from general customs or traditions, as well as the decisions of judges
    E.g. In Sept. 2019, the Supreme Court ruled against Boris Johnson’s prorogation of Parliament.
    E.g. the supreme court ruled the recent Rwanda scheme unlawful.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Conventions

A
  • Established norms of political behaviour rooted in past experience rather than the law
    E.g. Royal Assent for bills passed by parliament
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Authoritative Works

A
  • A handful of long-established legal and political texts that have come to be accepted as reference points
    E.g. Erskine May’s ‘Treatise on the law, privileges, proceedings and usage of parliament’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Principles of British constitution (4)

A
  • Parliamentary sovereignty
  • The rule of law
  • A Unitary state
  • Parliamentary govt. under a constitutional monarchy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Parliamentary Sovereignty

A
  • Parliament can legislate on any subject of its choosing
  • Legislation cannot be overturned by any higher authority
  • No parliament can bind its successors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How has parliamentary sovereignty been challenged in recent years?

A
  • Under the European Committee Act 1972, parliament agreed to make itself subservient to EU law.
  • Devolution saw power transfered
  • Increased use of referendums since 1997 could be said to have transferred a degree of legislative power back to the people.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

The Rule of Law (strands)

A
  • No one can be punished without a trial.
  • No one is above the law; all are subject to the same justice.
  • Laws passed by parliament must be interpreted and applied by an independent judiciary.
18
Q

Features of a Unitary State

A
  • A highly centralised state in which political power is concentrated at the centre.
  • Central govt. has ultimate authority over sub-national institutions.
  • All areas of the state are governed in the same way and there is a high degree of administrative standardisation.
19
Q

Ways which the UK is still a unitary state

A
  • Highly centralised - Westminster has parliamentary sovereignty.
  • Representatives of devolved govts. are relatively insignificant.
  • ‘De jure’, UK parliament could reverse devolution.
  • The whole UK left the EU in 2020, even though NI and Scotland voted remain.
20
Q

Ways which the UK is not still a unitary state

A
  • Devolution has dispersed power from Westminster to other UK nations.
  • ‘De facto’, devolution has become a permanent feature of the UK constitution since Sinn Fein wants NI to join ROI, Plaid Cymru wants Welsh independence and the SNP want Scottish independence.
21
Q

Strengths of the UK constitution

A
  • Adaptability: the constitution isn’t necessarily entrenched, and can be changed without need for parliamentary supermajority or referendum.
  • Strong govt.: the cabinet is party-based and generally exercises control over legislation in the Commons through its majority.
  • Accountability: the govt. is accountable to both parliament and the wider electorate, and due to the nature of the two-party system, an unpopular govt. will pay the price at the next general election.
21
Q

Weaknesses of the UK constitution

A
  • Outdated and undemocratic: key elements of common law date back to medieval times e.g. royal prerogative, and the hereditary principle of the Lords is hard to justify in a liberal democratic state.
  • Concentration of power: govt. with strong majority may have elective dictatorship, due to absence of codified constitution and with parliamentary sovereignty.
  • Lack of Clarity: Uncodified constitution, so not always possible to rule when a govt. has acted unconstitutionally. Can lead to govts. passing new acts which overturn unfavourable rulings in courts.
22
Q

New Labour and constitutional reform 1997-2010: Modernisation

A
  • New electoral systems for devolved assemblies, European parliament and elected mayors.
  • Constitutional Reform Act 2005.
  • Supreme Court started work in 2009.
  • All but 92 hereditary peers abolished from the Lords.
23
Q

New Labour and constitutional reform 1997-2010: Decentralisation

A
  • Scottish parliament with tax-raising and primary legislative powers.
  • NI Assembly with primary legislative powers.
  • Welsh Assembly with secondary legislative powers
  • Directly elected mayor of London and a London Assembly.
24
Q

New Labour and constitutional reform 1997-2010: Citizens’ Rights

A
  • The HRA 1998 enshrined most of the provisions of the ECHR in UK law.
  • The Freedom of Information Act 2000 gives greater access to info held by public bodies
25
Q

House of Lords Reform Act 2014

A

Aimed at halting the unstoppable increase of those eligible to sit and vote in the Lords, by giving existing peers the option to resign or retire

26
Q

How the HRA DOES effectively protect rights and liberties in the UK

A
  • All the bills introduced at Westminster (or in the devolved assemblies) are reviewed by lawyers to ensure they are ‘HRA-compliant).
  • Incorporates many of the provisions of the ECHR.
  • Many HRA provisions were codified into statute law.
27
Q

How the HRA does NOT effectively protect rights and liberties in the UK

A
  • Signatories to the ECHR have the right to request a derogation (temporary exemption) from its provisions where they are facing a crisis that threatens the nation’s security.
  • The HRA doesn’t have the same legal status as a codified constitution such as the US Bill of Rights
  • Only people with the resources and means could challenge a govt. action as they would have to bring their case to a foreign court.
28
Q

Individual Rights

A

Rights that are protected by the ECHR and HRA 1998 e.g. freedom from torture and inhumane treatment

29
Q

Collective Rights

A

Rights belonging to groups of people to be free from prejudice, discrimination or persecution.

29
Q

Strengths of the judiciary to best defend the rights of citizens

A
  • Judges exercise the rule of law and can use the HRA and their power of judicial review to ensure protected rights.
  • Enhanced measures for judicial independence has meant the judiciary is independent of the other two branches of the political system, so can defend rights based on law, without political pressure.
  • Judges are neutral and therefore can protect a person’s rights without discrimination or considerations of their beliefs.
30
Q

Weaknesses of the judiciary to best defend the rights of citizens

A
  • Judges are undemocratic and unaccountable so could abuse their position.
  • Senior judges work with parliament to advise on the legality of legislation, which may mean that they have less true neutrality if they had involvement in its creation.
  • Lack of a codified constitution means the judiciary cannot strike down primary legislation, even if there is an abuse of human rights.
31
Q

Strengths of parliament to best defend the rights of citizens

A
  • Has sovereignty so can determine what rights are in the UK and how they should be enforced.
  • Parliament is more representative of the people, so is better able to reflect the values of society.
  • Parliament introduced and passed all of the Acts relating to human rights.
  • MP’s represent their constituents and can raise the issue of citizens’ rights with govt. ministers.
  • Parliament is democratically elected so is more accountable for the people.
32
Q

Weaknesses of parliament to best defend the rights of citizens

A
  • Short-term political considerations may be more important to MPs than defending human rights.
  • Parliament can suspend the HRA in order to achieve its goals.
  • Parliament is often dominated by the governing party, leading to a ‘tyranny of the majority’ and leaving very few checks on govt. actions that contradict human rights.
33
Q

Issues of Individual & Collective rights: Belmarsh Case 2004

A

Individual - argued their right to liberty and fair trial had been infringed
Collective - govt. argued collective public safety overrode individual rights in cases of terrorism and national security.
The HoL ruled in favour of the individuals

34
Q

Gay couple vs Fundamentalist Christian Couple (incident occurred in 2008 but court ruling in 2011)

A

Gay couple - argued their right to be free of discrimination has been infringed when they were refused a room at the B&B.
Christian couple - argued their right to freedom of belief and religion should allow them to refuse the room.
- Supreme Court ruled in favour of the gay couple.

35
Q

Overseas Operations Act 2021

A

Many cases have been taken forward by lawyers on behalf of Iraqi & Afghan citizens who claim British soldiers have infringed their human rights.
The govt. argues that British soldiers need certain exemptions for human rights laws when acting in the national interest in war zones.

36
Q

Should prisoners be able to vote?

A

European Court of Human Rights has repeatedly criticised UK govt.’s stance on preventing most prisoners from voting.
Govt. argues that depriving prisoners from the right to vote is a proportionate response to criminals infringing the rights of others.

37
Q

Policing Act 2022 and Public Order Act 2023

A

Individual protestors argue that they have a right to peaceful protest, freedom of assembly and expression.
The govt. argues it has a duty to protect collective rights of citizens to go about their daily business without undue disruption of their freedoms.

38
Q

Investigatory Powers Act 2016

A
  • Some are concerned that the right to privacy is infringed by the new powers in this Act e.g. Google on behalf of their users.
    The govt. argues the collective right to security, including protection from child abuse and terrorism, outweighs individual rights.