The Massiah Doctrine Flashcards

1
Q

What is the Massiah Doctrine found in Massiah v. United States (1964)?

A

Once an individual is indicted on a crime, they have the right to an attorney (if they haven’t waived it) under the 6th amendment. For this specific crime, there is a “shield” around the defendant. Once this shield has been placed on the defendant for a crime, the state cannot deliberately elicit phrases regarding that crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the Massiah Doctrine limited to?

A

The rule is offense specific. So the defendant only has the protection for the specific crime which they were indicted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the remedy for a Massiah violation?

A

All evidence obtained through the violation must be suppressed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Under the Massiah Doctrine, if the police are after information about Crime B and gain information about Crime A in violation, can they use this information?

A

No. There is no good-faith exception to the Massiah Doctrine. This is because there would be way to much pressure on judges and allows for a bright line rule.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does “deliberate elicitation” mean for the Massiah Doctrine?

A

Can mean almost anything. But it almost always requires a “secret agent” situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Can there be a “passive agent” that wouldn’t violate Massiah because they wouldn’t elicit the information at all?

A

SCOTUS says that hypothetically it would be possible to have a passive agent who did not elicit the information in any manner but it would be almost impossible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What standard is the Massiah Doctrine held to when deciding if Crime A and Crime B are different crimes?

A

The same standard as Double Jeopardy. To prove there is no problem requires the state to show that the crimes require different elements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly