The Learning Theory Flashcards
1
Q
describe classical conditioning
A
- creates the attachment
- babies form an attachment through association (they associate their caregiver with the pleasure of milk)
- milk is an unconditioned stimulus which leads to the unconditioned response of pleasure
- over time the baby come to associate the caregiver (initially a neutral stimulus) with milk, so the person becomes associated with that feeling of pleasure, this continuous association eventually leads to the formation of an attachment
2
Q
describe operant conditioning
A
- strengthens the attachment
- the baby is attached to the caregiver because she provides positive and negative reinforcement
food is a primary reinforcer as it provides pleasure (pos reinforcement) and takes away hunger (neg reinforcement) - because the caregiver provides food she is a secondary reinforcer
- therefore the baby becomes attached to the caregiver and learns to cry for her attention in order to receive the reward of milk/remove discomfort
- the reinforcement is two-way
3
Q
basic description of the learning theory
A
argues that infants learn to become attached to their caregiver, primarily because they provide food, through the processes of operant and classical conditioning
4
Q
explain one strength of the learning theory
A
- supported by controlled lab research
- e.g. Pavlov found dogs would salivate when an assistant entered the room
suggests they learnt to associate them with food - supports the view that associations can be made between people and food the provide through classical conditioning
- therefore can say there is controlled lab research supporting classical conditioning
5
Q
explain two weaknesses of the learning theory
A
- contradicted by animal research
- e.g. Harlow
- learning theory would’ve predicted baby monkeys would attach to wire mother as she provides food
- but they formed attachments based on contact comfort, clinging to the cloth mother when frightened
- weakens learning theory because it suggests food isn’t the most important factor in forming an attachment (comfort and security is more important)
- contradicted by Schaffer and Emerson
found sensitivity to needs is most important factor in forming an attachment - found that 40% of babies didn’t form primary attachment with the person who fed and changed them
- formed primary attachment with the person who was most sensitive to their needs
- contradicts learning theory as it suggests attachments are formed on sensitivity to needs and not food
- contradicted by Schaffer and Emerson